Skip to main content
Research Paper Graduate 2,310 words

Diversity and Inclusion Policy: Key Factors for Success

~12 min read 4 sections Business · Human Resources
Abstract

This research proposal investigates the factors that organizations should consider when developing and implementing diversity and inclusion (D&I) policies. Despite a growing body of literature affirming the importance of workplace diversity, a significant gap remains regarding the specific factors that determine whether a D&I policy succeeds or fails. Drawing on a positivist epistemological framework, the study proposes analyzing five organizations that have successfully implemented D&I policies and five that have not. Data will be gathered through in-person and telephone interviews as well as emailed questionnaires, then analyzed using SPSS software. The study aims to identify patterns that explain successful policy development, with the goal of providing organizations a practical, evidence-based guide for building inclusive, effective diversity policies aligned with their strategic goals.

Key Takeaways
  • Introduction: Rationale, research questions, and study goals
  • Theoretical Background: Literature review on D&I policy challenges and gaps
  • Research Method: Positivist paradigm, data collection, and SPSS analysis
  • Summary and Ethical Considerations: Recap of methodology, limitations, and ethical concerns
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾

What makes this paper effective

  • Clearly identifies a research gap — the lack of literature on factors that determine D&I policy success — and builds the entire study rationale around closing that gap.
  • Uses a comparative design (five successful vs. five unsuccessful organizations) that is well-suited to uncovering the variables that differentiate policy outcomes.
  • Honestly acknowledges the limitations of the chosen positivist paradigm, including potential participant bias and researcher detachment challenges, which strengthens the proposal's credibility.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The proposal demonstrates effective use of a gap-identification strategy: the author surveys existing diversity literature, concedes that importance and benefits of D&I are well documented, and then pivots to argue that the how — the specific policy factors — remains underexplored. This technique justifies the study's existence without dismissing prior scholarship, a standard move in graduate-level research proposals.

Structure breakdown

The paper follows a conventional research proposal structure: an abstract summarizing the entire study, an introduction establishing context and research questions, a theoretical background reviewing relevant literature and critiquing current practice, a method section detailing paradigm, sample, data collection, and analysis, and a brief summary recapping contributions and limitations. Each section builds logically on the last, moving from "why this matters" to "how we will study it."

Essay 2,310 words

Introduction

Diversity management programs have been introduced across numerous public and private organizations both nationally and globally. There have been different aims for introducing diversity initiatives — among them increasing women's and ethnic minorities' participation within the workplace, helping organizations reach new and untapped markets, and incorporating wider decision-making perspectives (Lorbiecki & Jack, 2000). However, the success of these initiatives has not always met expectations. With such notable aims, it is worth examining why some programs work so well and others fail considerably.

Cao, Clarke, and Lehaney (2003) posit that organizations do recognize ever-increasing global competition and rising customer expectations. It is for this reason that some organizations opt to develop a diversity and inclusion policy. Such a policy is meant to offer the organization an opportunity to change and transform how it conducts operations. Unfortunately, the implementation of these policies is often rushed, and many managers do not fully understand the true meaning of diversity. Failure to consider the vital factors for diversity and inclusion results in a policy that looks good on paper but cannot be meaningfully implemented.

Global organizations need to understand the differences in diversity across the countries in which they operate (Derven, 2014). This requires organizations to perform due diligence in order to build an inclusive and diverse workforce. Diversity is vital for the success of organizations. With an effective policy, an organization can protect itself against costly litigation and compensation claims, and it will also experience reduced staff turnover. Reducing staff turnover ensures that the organization lowers its hiring costs and attracts the right talent (Pless & Maak, 2004; Williams & O'Reilly III, 1998). An organization will also enhance its image and attract both customers and potential talent. The current business environment is global, and for an organization to embrace global commerce it must also embrace diversity and inclusion. This allows the business to compete globally by better understanding different market segments, while also improving customer interactions through a diverse workforce that can engage with customers from varied backgrounds (Cao et al., 2003; R. R. Thomas, Russell, & Schumacher, 2001).

There have been numerous studies conducted regarding the importance of diversity and inclusion. However, there are gaps in the research, particularly when it comes to the factors organizations should consider when developing their diversity and inclusion policies (Gilbert & Ivancevich, 2000; Kreitz, 2008). The relative lack of this information makes it difficult for organizations to develop policies that will guarantee the success of diversity and inclusion efforts. The aim of this research is to uncover the different factors that should be considered when an organization is developing a diversity and inclusion policy. These factors are vital and may differ depending on the objectives of the organization. With this information, it will be easier for organizations to identify how they can develop effective policies that result in positive growth (Pless & Maak, 2004).

The research questions guiding this study are: What are the factors to consider when developing a D&I policy? What factors contribute to the development of a successful D&I policy? The objective is to fill the gap currently present in the literature. Information is lacking regarding the factors that organizations should consider when developing diversity and inclusion policies (Kreitz, 2008; Shore et al., 2011). This research aims to fill that gap by identifying the vital factors organizations should consider. There are both success stories and failures in D&I implementation globally, all of which can be attributed to the policies that have been developed.

3 Sections Hidden · 960 words
Theoretical Background480 words
According to Farndale, Biron, Briscoe, and Raghuram (2015), with the continued increase in the number of women and people of color joining the workforce, diversity has been a keen focus of research in the United States. In many instances, when organizations address workforce diversity they do so…
Research Method370 words
The research paradigm for this study is positivism epistemology. The aim is to uncover the policies that have been shown…
Summary and Ethical Considerations110 words
This paper has reviewed the methodologies to be used in carrying out the research. The research paradigm selected is positivism, and data collection will be…

References

Cao, G., Clarke, S., & Lehaney, B. (2003). Diversity management in organizational change: Towards a systemic framework. Systems Research and Behavioral Science: The Official Journal of the International Federation for Systems Research, 20(3), 231–242.

Derven, M. (2014). Diversity and inclusion by design: Best practices from six global companies. Industrial and Commercial Training, 46(2), 84–91.

Farndale, E., Biron, M., Briscoe, D. R., & Raghuram, S. (2015). A global perspective on diversity and inclusion in work organisations. Taylor & Francis.

Gilbert, J. A., & Ivancevich, J. M. (2000). Valuing diversity: A tale of two organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(1), 93–105.

Knights, D., & Omanovic, V. (2015). Rethinking diversity in organizations and society. In The Oxford Handbook of Diversity in Organizations (pp. 83–108).

Kochan, T., Bezrukova, K., Ely, R., Jackson, S., Joshi, A., Jehn, K., … Thomas, D. (2003). The effects of diversity on business performance: Report of the diversity research network. Human Resource Management, 42(1), 3–21.

Kreitz, P. A. (2008). Best practices for managing organizational diversity. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(2), 101–120.

Lorbiecki, A., & Jack, G. (2000). Critical turns in the evolution of diversity management. British Journal of Management, 11, S17–S31.

Miller, G. E., Mills, A. J., & Mills, J. H. (2009). Introduction: Gender and diversity at work — changing theories, changing organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 26(3), 173.

Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 402–433.

Muzio, D., & Tomlinson, J. (2012). Researching gender, inclusion and diversity in contemporary professions and professional organizations. Gender, Work & Organization, 19(5), 455–466.

Pless, N., & Maak, T. (2004). Building an inclusive diversity culture: Principles, processes and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(2), 129–147.

Sabharwal, M. (2014). Is diversity management sufficient? Organizational inclusion to further performance. Public Personnel Management, 43(2), 197–217.

Shore, L. M., Randel, A. E., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., Holcombe Ehrhart, K., & Singh, G. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1262–1289.

Tatlı, A., & Özbilgin, M. F. (2009). Understanding diversity managers' role in organizational change: Towards a conceptual framework. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 26(3), 244–258.

Theodorakopoulos, N., & Budhwar, P. (2015). Guest editors' introduction: Diversity and inclusion in different work settings — emerging patterns, challenges, and research agenda. Human Resource Management, 54(2), 177–197.

Thomas, D. A., & Ely, R. J. (2001). A new paradigm for managing diversity. Harvard Business Review, 74(5), 79–94.

Thomas, R. R., Russell, J. S., & Schumacher, K. T. (2001). Beyond race and gender: Unleashing the power of your total work force by managing diversity. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 1(3), 16.

Wheeler, M. L. (2001). The diversity executive: Tasks, competencies, and strategies for effective leadership.

Williams, K., & O'Reilly III, C. (1998). Demography and diversity in organisations: A review of 40 years of research. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organisational Behaviour (Vol. 20). JAI Press.

Key Concepts in This Paper
D&I Policy Workforce Diversity Policy Implementation Positivism Organizational Inclusion Diversity Management Research Gap Stakeholder Commitment SPSS Analysis Comparative Design
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Diversity and Inclusion Policy: Key Factors for Success. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/diversity-inclusion-policy-factors-organizations-2173508

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.