Due Process vs. Crime Control: Ireland's Criminal Justice
This paper examines Herbert Packer's two competing models of criminal justice — the Due Process Model and the Crime Control Model — and analyzes their practical implications for defendants' rights, capital punishment, and law enforcement behavior. Drawing on scholarly sources, the paper explores how limited law enforcement resources can push authorities toward illegal evidence-gathering, and why the due process framework remains essential in preventing unjust outcomes. The paper then applies these models to the Irish criminal justice system, tracing Ireland's gradual shift from a flexible, defendant-centered approach toward stricter crime control measures, including mandatory sentencing and bail restrictions introduced through legislation such as the Criminal Justice Act 1999 and the Bail Act 1997.
- Introduction to the Due Process Model: Defines due process and defendants' rights in criminal justice
- Packer's Two Models of Criminal Justice: Contrasts Crime Control and Due Process theoretical models
- Crime Control, Limited Resources, and Legal Compromise: Explains how resource limits push authorities toward illegality
- Capital Punishment and Due Process: Applies due process framework to capital punishment debates
- The Irish Criminal Justice System and Due Process: Examines Ireland's flexible, defendant-centered justice tradition
- Ireland's Shift Toward the Crime Control Model: Traces Irish legislative moves toward stricter crime control
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its analysis in a well-established theoretical framework — Packer's two models — before applying it to a specific national context, giving the argument a clear logical progression.
- Direct quotations from multiple academic and legal sources are integrated to support each claim, providing evidentiary weight to what could otherwise be purely abstract discussion.
- The Irish case study grounds the abstract models in concrete legislation (the Criminal Justice Act 1999 and the Bail Act 1997), making the theoretical argument practically relevant.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective comparative application of theoretical frameworks: it first explains two opposing conceptual models, then uses them as analytical lenses to evaluate real-world criminal justice policy. This method — introducing a framework and then testing it against empirical or legal evidence — is a core technique in criminology and legal studies essays.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by defining the Due Process Model and contextualizing its importance, then introduces Packer's dual-model framework. It follows with sections on the Crime Control Model's practical appeal, the sensitive issue of capital punishment, and finally transitions to a focused case study of Ireland. The Irish section is divided between the country's historically flexible approach and its more recent legislative moves toward crime control, ending with bail reform as the clearest evidence of this shift.
Introduction to the Due Process Model
The Due Process Model concentrates on providing suspects with a fair investigation and on removing all possible influences that might have an unreasonable effect on defendants. The defendant's rights are one of the most important concepts throughout the criminal justice process. While in some justice systems a legal technicality does not necessarily represent a significant factor in a person's case, it can be especially important in situations where the due process model is being upheld. This means that a person is very likely to be released from charges if the authorities determine that the defendant's rights were violated at any point during the process.
Being concerned with due process is believed by many to be an essential part of the justice system, especially in corrupt jurisdictions where particular individuals feel that they must do anything in their power to apprehend criminals — even when this means obtaining evidence through illegal means. The due process model is largely the result of Herbert Packer's attempt to introduce a conceptual framework of the criminal process. He considered that this framework would allow people to gain a more complex understanding of the justice system and of the position they need to take with regard to it.
Works Cited
Campbell, L. "From Due Process to Crime Control — The Decline of Liberalism in the Irish Criminal Justice System." Retrieved July 5, 2015, from http://www.academia.edu/269582/From_Due_Process_to_Crime_Control_The_Decline_of_Liberalism_In_the_Irish_Criminal_Justice_System
Coulter, C. "Ahern Aims to Curb Crime in New Bail Bill." Retrieved July 5, 2015, from http://www.irishtimes.com/news/ahern-aims-to-curb-crime-in-new-bail-bill-1.772955
Hsieh, A. The Exclusionary Rule of Evidence: Comparative Analysis and Proposals for Reform. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2014.
Roach, K. Due Process and Victims' Rights: The New Law and Politics of Criminal Justice. University of Toronto Press, 1999.
Zimring, F.E. & Simon, W.G. The Contradictions of American Capital Punishment. Oxford University Press, 2003.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.