Edward Snowden and the NSA: Surveillance, Leaks, and Rights
This essay reviews the literature surrounding Edward Snowden's 2013 disclosure of thousands of classified National Security Agency documents and the far-reaching consequences that followed. It surveys the most damaging revelations — including PRISM, XKeyscore, and MonsterMind — and outlines the NSA's stated intelligence-gathering mission before and after the leaks. The essay then analyzes competing perspectives on Snowden's actions, weighing arguments that he performed a patriotic service against claims that he committed treason and caused irreparable harm to national security. Finally, the essay considers whether U.S. government surveillance programs violated Snowden's constitutional rights, concluding that while legitimate privacy concerns exist, Snowden's unauthorized disclosures remain legally indefensible.
- Background of the Issue: Snowden's leaks and the programs revealed
- NSA Intelligence-Gathering Mission and Authority: NSA legal mandate and post-leak mission
- Analysis of Snowden's Actions and Their Consequences: Patriot vs. traitor debate over Snowden
- Constitutional Rights and Legal Dimensions: Whether NSA surveillance violated the Fourth Amendment
- Conclusion: Snowden judged a fugitive, consequences assessed
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper balances multiple perspectives — patriot versus traitor, security versus privacy — by marshaling direct quotations from officials, nominees, and critics on both sides, giving the argument a fair, documented quality.
- The numbered enumeration of Snowden's disclosures is well-organized and provides a concrete evidentiary foundation before moving into analysis, anchoring abstract debates in specific program names and capabilities.
- The use of primary-source language from the NSA's own mission statements and Executive Order 12333 gives the discussion of the agency's legal mandate authoritative grounding.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of comparative sourcing: it layers governmental documents (Executive Order 12333, NSA mission statements) against journalistic reporting and political commentary to show that the same set of facts can support sharply divergent conclusions. This technique is useful when writing about contested public-policy issues where framing and source selection are themselves part of the argument.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens with a brief framing introduction, then moves through four functional sections. The first establishes factual background — who Snowden is and what he disclosed. The second outlines the NSA's legal mandate and post-leak mission. The third presents the central debate, weighing patriotic and treasonous interpretations. A concluding section renders a judgment while acknowledging the historical record remains open. The structure is linear and chronological within sections, making it easy to follow.
Background of the Issue
This essay reviews the relevant literature to provide background on Edward Snowden and how his high-profile actions adversely affected the work of the National Security Agency (NSA). An analysis of what the NSA was doing prior to the leaks and how it collects intelligence information now is followed by an examination of what Snowden leaked and why. Finally, a discussion of whether the U.S. government violated Snowden's constitutional rights is followed by a summary of the research and important findings in the conclusion.
Beginning in June 2013, Edward Snowden, a computer analyst working for the National Security Agency, began leaking thousands of classified documents. These documents were disclosed to The Guardian and alleged that the NSA routinely gathered telephonic metadata from telecommunications companies, allowing it to scrutinize American citizens' Internet activities (Morrison, 2014). According to Francheschi-Bicchierai (2014), among the thousands of documents Snowden leaked, the secrets most harmful to the NSA included the following:
Secret court orders authorized the NSA to review American citizens' telephone records (Francheschi-Bicchierai, 2014), operating essentially as a domestic intelligence agency (Stein, 2013). Snowden also revealed how the NSA's telephone surveillance program could gather data on Americans' calls, including the numbers dialed, the length of conversations, and the dates on which they occurred (McCarthy, 2013).
The disclosure of PRISM, an NSA initiative to gain direct access to servers at major online providers such as Google, Yahoo, Facebook, Microsoft, and Apple (Francheschi-Bicchierai, 2014). This disclosure generated a flood of criticism from the international community and from citizens of both the U.S. and the U.K. regarding security, privacy, and government spying (Be very afraid, 2013). The PRISM initiative, which enables NSA officials to collect data from these major Internet companies, had been in effect since 2007 as part of the global war on terrorism (Taking liberties in the name of freedom, 2013).
The NSA routinely conducts espionage on foreign countries and world leaders, even those friendly to the United States (Francheschi-Bicchierai, 2014).
The disclosure of XKeyscore, which allows the NSA to determine everything a computer user does online (Francheschi-Bicchierai, 2014).
The NSA's attempts to decode encrypted data and sabotage Internet security (Francheschi-Bicchierai, 2014).
The disclosure that an NSA team of hackers exists and a description of the techniques they use (Francheschi-Bicchierai, 2014).
The NSA had access to Google and Yahoo data centers (Francheschi-Bicchierai, 2014).
The NSA routinely gathers private citizens' text messages (Francheschi-Bicchierai, 2014) and likely has access to audio recordings of telephone calls (Be very afraid, 2013).
The NSA intercepts all telephone calls in Afghanistan and the Bahamas (Francheschi-Bicchierai, 2014).
An NSA program routinely intercepts the emails of non-U.S. persons located outside the United States (Yoo, 2014).
The disclosure of MonsterMind, an NSA cyberattack tool that automatically unleashes a hostile response when network intrusions are detected — a tool that Snowden alleges brought down Syria's Internet service in 2003 (Ackerman, 2014).
Taken together, it is not surprising that the U.S. government wants to apprehend Snowden, who — following an international odyssey in search of asylum (Stein, 2013) — was living in an undisclosed location in Russia temporarily while seeking long-term sanctuary elsewhere (Be very afraid, 2013). U.S. federal prosecutors have charged Snowden with theft of government property and espionage (Be very afraid, 2013), and he has been characterized alternatively as a traitor and even an anarchist (McCarthy, 2013).
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.