Eli Whitney: The Cotton Gin, Weapons, and Industrial Legacy

Introduction

Eli Whitney is widely remembered in American history, primarily for his late-18th-century invention of the cotton engine — or "gin," as it came to be known. In retrospect, the cotton gin transformed the economic portrait of the nascent United States and may have unintentionally established the demand for enslaved labor in America, leading the country into its most shameful period of history. Even more significant is Whitney's nearly simultaneous contribution to firearms design, manufacture, and production. Barely fifty years after his first major technological success, the product of that success would help trigger a war that shaped American society and culture, fought with battlefield weapons produced en masse in quantities that contributed greatly to the tragic casualty figures of the American Civil War (Nevins & Commager 1992).

Whitney is less widely appreciated for his other innovations, such as the many ways he reshaped business operations management and even the accounting methods (EWM 2008) that would later evolve into the modern business management principles ubiquitous in industrial manufacturing and throughout business economics today. According to some renowned American historical commentators (Mills 1953), the specific elements of business operations management introduced in this country by Whitney may have helped inspire the later contributions of even more influential figures in manufacturing — contributions largely credited to Henry Ford in the case of assembly-line production, and to personnel task management traditionally associated with Frederick Taylor (Hounshell 1984).

Early Life and Development

Eli Whitney was born into a Massachusetts farming family in 1765 and lost his mother at the age of 12. While unremarkable in apparent academic talents, Whitney demonstrated superior technical skills and a natural talent for understanding mechanical principles from the time he was barely in his teens. He produced a violin from drawing board to complete assembly and could disassemble and reassemble timepieces before the age of 14 (EWM 2008).

The American Revolution had resulted in a complete embargo on goods produced in England, precipitating a scarcity of iron nails necessary for virtually every type of manufacturing and building process. Whitney immediately saw the opportunity to capitalize on this shortage and set about manufacturing nails for sale, working directly out of a shed on his family's property. The cottage nail-forging industry he created to supply the great demand for nails was so successful that Whitney set out to find help, returning home after a three-day trip with a hired assistant.

It was in the context of manufacturing nails as a teenager that Whitney began implementing accounting principles such as factoring every conceivable element of cost into the "overhead" of his business (Evans 2004). Later in his career, he would expand this concept to incorporate more sophisticated elements of business manufacturing, including fixed costs such as the expense of acquiring and maintaining equipment and that of necessary insurance (Gray 1987).

When England subsequently lifted the trade embargo with the newly emancipated American nation, the niche nail-manufacturing market that Whitney had filled in the interim dried up. Anticipating this in advance, he took note of a change in social fashion trends of the period, adapting his manufacturing processes and shifting his output to produce hatpins instead of nails. Whitney had perceived the increased demand for pins by American women, necessitated by the shift from securing bonnets to the head by means of a scarf tied below the chin to the use of three pins applied directly to the bonnet (Evans 2004).

With the proceeds of his nail-manufacturing business combined with money earned teaching at local schools, Whitney enrolled at the Leicester Academy and eventually matriculated at Yale University at the unusually old age of 23, supplementing his finances by repairing machinery and equipment owned and operated by the university. He graduated in 1792 (Evans 2004). Rather than continuing the study of law, Whitney settled into a tutoring position in South Carolina, until a fellow Yale graduate, Phineas Miller, introduced him to Catherine Green — the widow of Revolutionary War hero General Nathaniel Green — for whom Miller worked as manager of her Georgia estate (EWM 2008).

It was General Green who, together with his wife Catherine, endured the miserable winter of 1777–1778 with Washington's troops dug in at Valley Forge. General Green was credited with maintaining the troops' fighting capabilities and spirits, going so far as to finance their supplies and winter provisions by pledging much of his personal property. In return, the Greens eventually received a Georgia plantation named Mulberry Grove as partial repayment of General Green's wartime expenses. In fact, much of the debt incurred by the Green family far exceeded the plantation's value, and most of it was never reimbursed by the government after the war.

General Green died penniless at the age of 44, after which Catherine battled Congress for six years, eventually receiving a grant of $47,000. By that time, she and Miller had married secretly, worried that their marriage could potentially undermine the award of compensation due Catherine by virtue of her former husband's wartime heroism — not to mention her own (Evans 2004).

The Cotton Gin

Like other southern plantations, the Green plantation in Georgia produced cotton using a painstaking method of hand-separating cotton fibers from cotton seeds. Crude mechanical devices had been implemented in the separation process in coastal regions, but the consistency and greater stickiness of inland cotton crops clogged the machines, rendering them useless throughout much of the American South. Unlike the black-seed strain of cotton plants that grew in abundance in coastal regions, the green-seed strain relied upon by inland plantations was exceptionally difficult to process — its short fibers adhered stubbornly to the seeds. The more productive, long-fiber coastal black-seed variety, by contrast, simply would not grow elsewhere despite the greatest efforts at cultivation (Nevins & Commager 1992).

In the American South, the slave trade had begun to be seen as an economic opportunity, but the difficulties presented by the green-seed cotton plant threatened the future economic viability of the entire inland industry, even with the benefit of enslaved labor (Lakwete 2004). On the other hand, cotton was the principal component in the growing textile industry and therefore represented tremendous potential revenue for southern cotton-producing states if this particular difficulty could be overcome. Well aware of Whitney's inventive talents and previous accomplishments, Catherine Green suggested that he consider devising a solution to the problem. Whitney did so, taking only 9 or 10 days to develop the first machine capable of separating green-seed cotton fibers from seeds more efficiently.

Essentially, the famous cotton gin was a fairly simple device consisting of a hand-cranked rotor system that fed raw cotton into a roller lined with teeth sized appropriately for separating cotton fiber from cotton seed (Evans 2004). Whitney is reputed to have remarked, during his lifetime, that one of the inspirations for the concept occurred to him after watching a cat reach through a fence for a chicken, only to withdraw a claw full of feathers (EWM 2008).

The impact of the cotton gin on the cotton-producing industry was immediate and dramatic, since it enabled one person to separate as much cotton as fifty individuals doing so by hand. Instead of taking a skilled laborer an entire day to produce a single pound of cotton fibers, even comparatively unskilled workers could produce fifty pounds of cotton fibers daily using one of Whitney's improved gins. On the advice of Green, Whitney envisioned a service-based industry akin to the sawmill industry (Lakwete 2004), wherein cotton farmers would pay as much as one-third to two-fifths of their cotton profits for the processing of their crops into marketable cotton fibers.

Initially, Whitney did market his invention for direct sale, but demand far outpaced his ability to supply sufficient quantities, leading to the introduction of numerous counterfeit versions throughout the American South and even in the northern states very shortly thereafter (Evans 2004).

In this respect, the innovative simplicity of Whitney's cotton gin was its greatest liability, at least in terms of providing revenue commensurate with its true value for its inventor. Whitney and Green had wrongly anticipated the willingness of cotton plantation owners to part with their profits. Unlike the situation with the sawmill industry — where the service was provided through equipment and infrastructure not easily reproduced by loggers — cotton farmers realized almost immediately that Whitney's gin could simply be reproduced independently. This completely eliminated any need to purchase equipment directly from its inventor, much less to part with a very substantial portion of crop revenues for the offsite service planned by Whitney (Hounshell 1984).

Whitney had secured a patent for his device in 1794, but southern plantation owners essentially ignored it, just as they often regarded "Northern" laws as inapplicable to them — partly on the principle of their reluctance to allow laws and restrictions promulgated in the North to dictate southern life, and partly because they counted on the difficulty encountered by northerners attempting to enforce laws in southern courts. As a result, Whitney spent many years and significant sums in dozens of lawsuits over infringement of his patented device, without ever realizing any significant recovery of lost profits (Lakwete 2004).

Bibliography

Evans, H. (2004). They Made America: From the Steam Engine to the Search Engine — Two Centuries of Innovators. New York: Little Brown & Co.

Friedman, L.M. (2005). A History of American Law. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Gray, I. (1987). General and Industrial Management. (Revised from Fayol's Original.) Belmont: David S. Lake Publishers.

Hounshell, D. (1984). From the American System to Mass Production, 1800–1932: The Development of Manufacturing Technology in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Lakwete, A. (2004). Inventing the Cotton Gin: Machine and Myth in Antebellum America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Mills, C.W. (1953). White Collar: The American Middle Class. New York: Oxford University Press.

Nevins, J., & Commager, H.S. (1992). A Pocket History of the United States. New York: Pocket Books.

Woodbury, R.S. (1960). The Legend of Eli Whitney and Interchangeable Parts. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Eli Whitney Museum Website (EWM). (2008). Eli Whitney: Inventing Change. Retrieved April 23, 2008, from