Ethical Dilemma in Procurement: Ed, John, and Workplace Integrity
This paper examines an ethical dilemma involving two employees — Ed and John — working in a procurement-related business environment. Ed operates under outdated practices that blur the line between legal and illegal business conduct, while John, a trainee, faces pressure to sign a falsified expense report. The paper explores the competing ethical obligations each character faces, the implications of John's earlier failure to confront the situation, and the long-term career consequences of both compliance and resistance. Ultimately, the paper argues that John should prioritize ethical conduct over short-term job security, as integrity positions him more favorably in the long run.
- Introduction to the Ethical Dilemma: Overview of the shared ethical dilemma facing both characters
- Ed's Ethical Position: Ed knowingly operates between legal and illegal practices
- John's Ethical Considerations: John faces pressure to sign a falsified expense report
- The Conflict Between Ed and John: Ed's career ambitions create direct pressure on John
- John's Prior Misstep and Its Consequences: John's earlier failure to confront Ed deepens his dilemma
- The Right Path Forward for John: Ethical action is recommended despite career risks
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper clearly distinguishes between the ethical situations of two different characters, avoiding conflation and giving each a focused analysis.
- It connects immediate situational ethics to long-term career consequences, grounding abstract ethical principles in practical outcomes.
- The paper identifies John's earlier failure as a contributing factor to his current dilemma, demonstrating nuanced cause-and-effect reasoning rather than assigning blame only to Ed.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates applied ethical analysis — the process of taking a specific real-world scenario and systematically evaluating the moral responsibilities and potential consequences for each party involved. Rather than simply stating that one character is wrong, the writer works through competing obligations, contextual pressures, and downstream implications, which is characteristic of professional or case-study ethical reasoning.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by introducing the shared ethical dilemma before separating the analysis into Ed's position and John's position. It then examines the interpersonal conflict between the two, revisits John's earlier decision-making failure, and closes with a prescriptive recommendation. This funnel structure — from shared context to individual analysis to resolution — is well-suited to applied ethics case studies at the undergraduate level.
Introduction to the Ethical Dilemma
In this situation, both Ed and John find themselves facing an ethical dilemma. Their dilemmas differ in nature but are closely connected, arising from the same problematic workplace environment at D&S and the questionable business practices it has normalized over time.
Ed's Ethical Position
Ed's ethical dilemma stems from the fact that he is operating based upon an outdated set of rules. The rules regarding business operations with procurement agents have changed, but Ed continues to operate as though the old rules are still in place. In addition, Ed recognizes that things around the office are not quite right, yet he is not working toward resolving the issues.
As Ed said to John, "…this is the way we do things around here, and they don't like changes to the system. We have a saying in the company that a blind eye goes a long way to getting business done." Ed seems to have made a conscious decision to walk the line between legal and illegal business operations, rather than encouraging the company to make the adjustments necessary to ensure its dealings are lawful. The Certificate of Procurement Integrity explicitly forbids procurement agents from giving procurement officials anything resembling a tip — a rule Ed is actively circumventing.
John's Ethical Considerations
For John, the ethical considerations are somewhat different from Ed's. While Ed has already made his decision about how he will operate, John is new to the company and is still in training. At this stage, John's ethical dilemma centers on whether to sign an expense report he knows has been falsified. Ed went behind John and adjusted John's numbers, and now he wants John to sign off on them.
This is an ethical dilemma for John because he did not generate those numbers himself and knows they are inaccurate. Ed admits that the adjustments he made to John's figures represent tips to procurement officials — a direct violation of procurement integrity rules. John therefore knows the numbers are wrong and understands exactly why.
John also has to contend with a problem that Ed chose never to address: the long-term question of how D&S conducts its business. If John is to have any meaningful career at D&S, he must decide how he will operate within — or against — a culture that has normalized unethical conduct. Understanding business ethics and the personal stakes involved is central to the decision he faces.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.