This paper examines the ethical dimensions of alcoholic beverage advertising in the United States. Drawing on empirical research, it argues that alcohol advertising significantly increases overall consumption, promotes underage drinking by exploiting adolescent susceptibility to social-appeal messaging, and disproportionately targets economically depressed and minority communities through tailored marketing strategies. The paper concludes that these documented harms justify stricter regulation of alcohol advertising — comparable to restrictions already placed on tobacco advertising — while stopping short of outright prohibition. The analysis balances respect for adult autonomy with the ethical imperative to protect vulnerable populations from the well-documented social and physical harms associated with alcohol abuse.
Alcohol abuse is a known cause of domestic violence and violent assaults, and it is directly responsible for thousands of deaths on American highways and countless non-fatal accidents that account for billions of dollars in property damage and insurance claims (Moore, Jones-Webb, Toomey, et al., 2008). Alcohol abuse is also a significant factor in truancy and juvenile delinquency, despite the fact that alcohol consumption by minors is prohibited by law. Partly for those reasons, the actual consumption of alcoholic beverages is no longer permitted in television advertisements, although beer and other alcoholic beverages are still heavily advertised in television commercials and elsewhere — in print media and on billboards, for example (Moore, Jones-Webb, Toomey, et al., 2008).
There are significant ethical issues connected to empirical studies that link all forms of alcoholic beverage advertising to increased consumption in general, and to both underage drinking and increased alcohol consumption in poor and minority neighborhoods in particular (Snyder, Milici, Slater, et al., 2006). Those three issues suggest that ethical concerns should either prohibit alcohol advertising outright, or at least impose regulations on such advertising that are no less strict than those governing the advertisement and depiction of smoking.
Modern advertising media are tremendously effective, which is precisely why product manufacturers and service providers pay billions of dollars annually to advertising companies to promote their products through various communications media.
Alcohol consumption is even more dangerous for underage drinkers than it is for adults over the age of 21 (Snyder, Milici, Slater, et al., 2006). Teenagers are especially prone to irresponsible behavior and to failing to comprehend the consequences of their behavioral choices, for various reasons — including physiological and developmental differences in brain structure and neurochemistry that predispose them to impulsivity in comparison to adults (Snyder, Milici, Slater, et al., 2006). To make matters worse, teenagers are also the least experienced drivers on the road, making them statistically more likely to be involved in vehicular accidents. Any increase in teenage alcohol consumption therefore presents an obvious and serious public safety concern.
Unfortunately, empirical evidence demonstrates conclusively that the advertisement of alcoholic beverages in media consumed by teenagers dramatically increases their likelihood of participating in underage drinking (Snyder, Milici, Slater, et al., 2006). This is especially troubling because teenagers are even more susceptible than adult consumers to advertising messages that connect alcoholic beverage consumption to social popularity, athleticism, and attractiveness — all mainstays of the advertising industry in general and the promotion of alcoholic products in particular (Snyder, Milici, Slater, et al., 2006).
"Targeted marketing in minority and poor communities"
Alcoholic beverages are sufficiently linked to harm and tragedy in the human community to justify regulating their sale and advertisement more strictly than other, more innocuous products that are legal for sale and distribution. Certainly, the Prohibition era demonstrated that it is unrealistic and unwise to address the problems caused by alcohol consumption by restricting the autonomous rights of adults to consume alcohol responsibly. However, because of the direct link between alcohol consumption and harm in the human community, the industry warrants tighter regulation in several respects.
You’re 60% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.