This paper examines the ethical implications of market segmentation and targeted marketing from both business and societal perspectives. While targeted marketing is often framed as an efficient use of advertising resources, the paper argues that it raises serious ethical concerns when directed at vulnerable populations. Key issues include marketing to children who cannot distinguish advertising from content, pharmaceutical advertising to the medically desperate, and fast food campaigns disproportionately targeting African-American and Latino communities. The paper contends that companies bear a legal and ethical responsibility not to misrepresent their products, and must exercise heightened sensitivity when marketing to groups that may lack the capacity to critically evaluate advertising claims.
Targeted marketing, from a retailer's standpoint, is usually viewed as a positive development. Scarce financial resources should be channeled toward advertising to the population groups most likely to be interested in a product. It is even possible to argue that targeting is beneficial from the consumer's standpoint as well, since people are made aware of products that are likely to interest them. Surely it is better to focus one's marketing than to bombard a wide range of people with products irrelevant to their needs.
From a societal standpoint, however, targeted marketing can be extremely problematic. The ethical concerns become especially acute when advertising is directed at populations that are least equipped to critically evaluate the messages they receive.
First and foremost is the problem of marketing to children — a target group that possesses few defenses against sophisticated advertising techniques and does not always understand the difference between sponsored and non-sponsored content. Cartoons that feature advertisements for toys promoting the characters in those cartoons may be indistinguishable from the ads that run beside them. Research has shown that "children most frequently request to go to the restaurants that engage in the most child-targeted advertising," primarily fast food restaurants like McDonald's and Burger King (Fast food facts, 2011).
But children are not the only vulnerable population. Individuals suffering from a particular medical condition may be more desperate and more apt to take advantage of a questionable product offering because of slick, targeted pharmaceutical advertising. The elderly may struggle to distinguish between advertising and scientific literature, given how much more aggressive advertising has become in recent years.
"Fast food campaigns targeting minority communities and health disparities"
"Legal and ethical duties when marketing to vulnerable demographics"
You’re 41% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.