Defining Ethical Leadership: Jeff Immelt and General Electric
This paper defines ethical leadership by integrating emotional intelligence (EI) and transformational leadership theory, drawing on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics as a philosophical foundation. It identifies four key attributes of exceptional ethical leaders: individualized consideration, intellectual stimulation, inspirational motivation, and idealized influence. The paper then applies these criteria to Jeff Immelt, former CEO of General Electric, examining how his implementation of CSR programs, ethics scorecards, Six Sigma quality management, and leadership development pipelines exemplify each attribute in practice. The analysis argues that ethical leadership is not merely a compliance function but a strategic driver of long-term organizational trust, credibility, and transformation.
- Introduction: The Nature of Ethical Leadership: Overview of ethical leadership's multifaceted, values-driven nature
- Defining Ethical Leadership: EI and transformational leadership as ethical leadership foundations
- Four Attributes of an Ethical Leader: Individualized consideration, stimulation, motivation, and influence explained
- Ethical Leadership and Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics: Idealized influence and Aristotelian ethics in leadership practice
- Jeff Immelt's Ethical Leadership at General Electric: Immelt's CSR programs and ethics scorecards at GE analyzed
- Conclusion: Ethics as the defining corporate asset of the future
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper anchors abstract leadership concepts to a concrete, real-world case study (Jeff Immelt at GE), making theoretical claims tangible and verifiable.
- It integrates multiple frameworks — transformational leadership, emotional intelligence, and Aristotelian ethics — into a unified model rather than treating them in isolation.
- The use of a relatable counter-example (the unethical sales manager) effectively illustrates why short-term, ends-justify-the-means thinking undermines idealized influence.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates framework synthesis: it builds a composite definition of ethical leadership by drawing on transformational leadership theory, emotional intelligence research, and classical philosophy, then applies the resulting four-attribute model to evaluate a specific leader. This technique — construct-then-apply — is a strong structure for analytical essays in management and leadership studies.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a conceptual introduction establishing why ethical leadership matters, then defines the construct by identifying its foundational components (EI and transformational leadership). The body systematically unpacks four attributes — individualized consideration, intellectual stimulation, inspirational motivation, and idealized influence — with supporting examples. A dedicated section then evaluates Jeff Immelt against these criteria. The conclusion returns to the broader strategic argument that ethics will become the defining competitive asset for organizations.
Introduction: The Nature of Ethical Leadership
The nature of leadership is multifaceted and often requires the continual mastery of new skills, insights, intelligence, and perspectives to remain effective over the long term. Such is the nature of ethical leadership, which requires a steadfast focus on a core set of ethical principles and values that guide a leader's judgment, ensuring consistency over time. These are also the fundamental aspects of any leader's long-term credibility, as well as their ability to transform their enterprises (John, 2005). Ethical leaders resonate with credibility and the willingness to change quickly in response to the needs of their organizations, employees, stakeholders, and customers.
The purpose of this analysis is to define what an ethical leader is, how managers can progress toward a more ethical leadership style, and how Jeff Immelt, CEO of General Electric, exemplifies what ethical leadership can accomplish within a very large multinational corporation. It has often been said that a leader is who one is and a manager is what one does (John, 2005). This is especially true when defining ethical leadership and its supporting concepts, including emotional intelligence (EI) and transformational leadership. Both of these ancillary components of ethical leadership ensure that the strategies designed and steps taken by leaders remain consistent over time and bring lasting change to organizations. Only by defining ethical leadership along these dimensions can its long-term value be fully realized within an enterprise. The integration of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics is also supported by the incorporation of EI and transformational leadership.
Defining Ethical Leadership
The foundational aspects of ethical leadership include a continual willingness to be accountable and transparent about every decision undertaken, in addition to providing clear evidence of values-driven decision-making. All of these attributes are critically important in transformational leadership skill sets as well. The definition of ethical leadership must therefore include the foundational elements of transformational leadership, as these latter concepts are what galvanize the many aspects of ethical leadership into place (John, 2005). Ethical leadership must combine EI and transformational leadership skills so that a leader can evoke change in an organization and make that change permanent (Mendonca, 2001). EI is important for ethical awareness; this core set of leadership skills enables a leader to correctly interpret complex, often abstract ethical dilemmas throughout an organization and arrive at acceptable solutions.
References
Crainer, S. (2009). From Edison to Immelt: The GE way. Business Strategy Review, 20(3), 18–22.
Gonzalez, T. F., & Guillen, M. (2002). Leadership ethical dimension: A requirement in TQM implementation. The TQM Magazine, 14(3), 150–164.
Heinze, E. (2010). The meta-ethics of law: Book one of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics. International Journal of Law in Context, 6(1), 23–44.
Immelt, J. (2010). Renewing American leadership. Vital Speeches of the Day, 76(2), 53.
John, H. H. (2005). Contextual implications for transformational and servant leadership: A historical investigation. Management Decision, 43(10), 1410–1431.
Mendonca, M. (2001). Preparing for ethical leadership in organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 18(4), 266–276.
Sonnenfeld, J. A. (2004). A return to the power of ideas. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(2), 30–33.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.