Ethics and Moral Ambiguity in Susan Glaspell's Trifles
This essay examines the ethical dimensions of Susan Glaspell's one-act play Trifles, focusing on two central concepts: ethical relativism and ethical ambiguity. The paper analyzes how the male characters — the Sheriff and the Attorney — operate within rigid, binary moral frameworks, while the female characters navigate far more nuanced ethical terrain. Drawing on Simone de Beauvoir's ethics of ambiguity and the Markula Center's discussion of ethical relativism, the essay argues that Glaspell uses the unresolved mystery of John Wright's death to interrogate the ethics of patriarchy, neighborly duty, and the moral complexity of gendered violence and resistance.
- Introduction: Moral Questions at the Heart of Trifles: Overview of ethical stakes and character moral frameworks
- Ethical Relativism and Gendered Moral Judgment: Applying ethical relativism to gender and Minnie's situation
- The Ethics of Doubt: Questions Surrounding John Wright's Death: Scrutinizing assumptions about Minnie's guilt
- The Ethic of Patriarchy and Social Justice: Patriarchy as the play's central ethical problem
- Conclusion: Tragic Ambiguity and the Play's Moral Legacy: De Beauvoir's ambiguity applied to the play's moral resolution
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The essay grounds its literary analysis in named ethical frameworks — ethical relativism and de Beauvoir's ethics of ambiguity — giving the argument academic credibility and precision.
- Close reading of dialogue, particularly Mrs. Hale's "I ought to have come," is used effectively to support claims about character ethics rather than relying on plot summary alone.
- The paper maintains productive ambiguity, mirroring the play's own refusal to deliver a verdict, which strengthens its central argument about moral complexity.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the technique of thematic synthesis: it reads a literary text through an explicitly named ethical lens and then draws secondary philosophical sources (de Beauvoir, ethical relativism theory) into dialogue with the primary text. This approach elevates the analysis beyond plot description into sustained argument about meaning and moral structure.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens by establishing the moral stakes of the play and its central characters. It then introduces the two governing ethical concepts — relativism and ambiguity — and applies them to the women's perspective. The third section interrogates the plausibility of Minnie's guilt, critiquing the investigators' moral failures. The essay closes by framing patriarchy as the overarching ethical problem and drawing on de Beauvoir to articulate the tragic ambiguity that defines the play's moral world. The structure follows a logical escalation from character-level ethics to systemic critique.
Introduction: Moral Questions at the Heart of Trifles
Susan Glaspell's play Trifles is filled with moral questions and ethical ambiguity. Throughout the one-act play, each character makes moral and ethical choices that affect the outcome of the investigation. Their moral choices also reveal key things about their characters, their worldview, and their ethical codes. At the center of the play is Minnie Wright and her dead husband John. Death is often a moral matter. If John had committed suicide, the act would have raised questions about the ethics of suicide. If indeed Minnie killed John, several other ethical questions come to the fore. Glaspell opts to leave the ethics of the play purposefully ambiguous. Whereas the men on the side of the law — like the Sheriff and Attorney — have simplistic ethical systems in which there are clear-cut delineations between right and wrong, the women in Trifles explore far more complex dimensions of moral choice.
Ethical Relativism and Gendered Moral Judgment
Trifles explores two major concepts in ethics: ethical relativism and ethical ambiguity. Ethical relativism suggests that there are situational variables — including the context of culture — that determine whether an act is ethical or not. Gender can be one of those variables. If there is "a range of practices considered morally acceptable in some societies but condemned in others, including infanticide, genocide, polygamy, racism, sexism, and torture," then it becomes clear that if Minnie did indeed kill her husband, the act might not be as categorically wrong as the Attorney and Sheriff believe (Velasquez & Meyer 1). The women certainly seem to be sympathetic to Minnie, especially as they begin to suspect she may have been abused.
They note that when she was young, Minnie was beautiful. "She used to wear pretty clothes and be lively, when she was Minnie Foster, one of the town girls singing in the choir," states Mrs. Hale. After years of marriage to John, the light went out of her spirit. Especially when they discover what her husband was capable of — potentially killing a sweet bird — it is easy to understand how Minnie might have reached a breaking point.
Conclusion: Tragic Ambiguity and the Play's Moral Legacy
The tragedy of ambiguity is more than evident in Trifles. It was certainly not ethical to strangle a poor innocent bird, and likewise unethical to do so if that bird belonged to someone. It is unethical to presume Mrs. Wright's guilt while ignoring the basic facts of the case. Yet it may be paradoxically ethical to withhold evidence from the law — especially when that law is grounded on unethical principles such as patriarchy. Glaspell's play ultimately refuses to deliver a simple moral verdict, inviting readers to sit with the discomfort of de Beauvoir's ethical ambiguity and consider the ways in which systemic injustice complicates individual moral responsibility.
Works Cited
De Beauvoir, Simone. "The Ethics of Ambiguity." Retrieved online: https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/ethics/de-beauvoir/ambiguity/ch01.htm
Glaspell, Susan. Trifles.
Velasquez, S.J. & Meyer, M.J. "Ethical Relativism." Markula Center. Retrieved online: http://www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/decision/ethicalrelativism.html
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.