EU Bankruptcy Reform, Germany's Hegemony, and the Euro
This paper examines four interconnected questions in European economic policy. It evaluates the pros and cons of bankruptcy legislation in Europe versus the American system, advocating for a Chapter 11-style restructuring approach as a humane middle ground for entrepreneurs and creditors. It then explains why Germany is considered a "reluctant hegemon" in the EU, forced by economic interdependence to repeatedly bail out weaker member states. The paper also considers why Germany must remain assertive in EU governance, and concludes by weighing the benefits and costs of the euro as a common currency for Germany, Greece, and the broader European Union.
- Bankruptcy Legislation: Pros and Cons in Europe and America: Compares European and American bankruptcy systems and consequences
- The Case for Chapter 11-Style Reform in Europe: Advocates Chapter 11 restructuring as humane middle ground
- Germany as the EU's Reluctant Hegemon: Explains Germany's role bailing out weaker EU economies
- Why Germany Must Be Assertive in the EU: Three reasons Germany must press for EU economic reform
- Benefits and Costs of the Euro as a Common Currency: Weighs euro's benefits against tensions and economic disparity
- Conclusion: Euro described as double-edged sword for EU members
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Organizes a multi-part question response clearly, with each question given its own focused section and a direct, declarative answer at the outset.
- Uses specific, concrete examples — such as Donald Trump's four bankruptcies and Greece's fiscal crisis — to ground abstract policy arguments in recognizable real-world cases.
- Balances competing perspectives fairly, acknowledging both the pros and cons of each policy position before reaching a reasoned conclusion.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective comparative analysis: it systematically contrasts European and American bankruptcy frameworks, and weighs Germany's economic strength against the fiscal vulnerabilities of Greece and other EU members. This technique — presenting two or more systems side by side and evaluating trade-offs — allows the author to arrive at nuanced, evidence-supported recommendations rather than one-sided conclusions.
Structure breakdown
The paper is structured as a short-answer response to four discrete policy questions drawn from a global strategic management course. Each section opens with a direct answer, develops supporting evidence drawn from course readings (Peng, 2014; Crum, 2013), and closes with a brief evaluative statement. The final section on the euro is the most developed, featuring both a benefits analysis and a costs analysis before a synthesizing conclusion.
Bankruptcy Legislation: Pros and Cons in Europe and America
There are several pros and cons in bankruptcy legislation issues. In the current European systems, entrepreneurs forced to file for bankruptcy protection carry business failures and associated debts for years, may be liable to criminal charges, and may even be driven to suicide by crushing failure and ongoing debt (Peng, 2014, p. 145). Those consequences and the "fear of failure" rampant in Europe cause some entrepreneurs to abandon their ideas without ever trying to develop them. The "advantage" of the current system, however, favors creditors, because creditors are still supposed to get paid; the money owed to them does not simply have to be written off as losses (Peng, 2014, p. 145).
The American bankruptcy system, which gives bankrupt entrepreneurs two options — either complete liquidation and walking away from debt, or restructuring to renegotiate with and pay creditors according to court-approved schedules — also has pros and cons. The obvious "pro" is that entrepreneurs are more likely to try new ideas when the penalties for failure are not so devastating (Peng, 2014, p. 145), creating more opportunities for business. Meanwhile, Donald Trump signifies the most obvious "con." Trump is an entrepreneur who filed four bankruptcies over 25 years in a series of failed businesses, which forced creditors to accept less than they were owed over a longer period of time (Carroll & Youngman, 2015). While Trump might deem that "business as usual," it came at significant cost to his businesses' creditors.
The Case for Chapter 11-Style Reform in Europe
It appears that there is room for bankruptcy reform in Europe, particularly toward something resembling America's Chapter 11 Bankruptcy, which restructures debt and renegotiates payment to creditors over time (Peng, 2014, p. 145). It is designed primarily to save a business while still paying creditors, with a court presiding over the process. That method represents a humane approach to entrepreneurial failure and respects the rights of creditors who should be paid. This hybrid solution neither lets creditors walk away empty-handed nor punishes debtors simply for the sake of punishment. This restructuring approach appears the most logical and the most likely to succeed as a model for European reform.
Germany as the EU's Reluctant Hegemon
Germany is the reluctant hegemon because it is a financially powerful European country that is repeatedly called upon to rescue several weaker countries within the EU. A "hegemon" is a powerful, dominant entity, and Germany certainly qualifies given its prudent economic policies, its relatively healthy financial situation, and its historically consistent budget surplus (Peng, 2014, p. 131). However, while Germany was practicing sound financial management, other countries such as Greece were failing badly due to increases in consumer demand, government spending binges, excessive borrowing, large budget deficits, unsustainable national debt, unrealistic debt repayment schedules, government corruption, a shadow economy, and widespread tax evasion (Peng, 2014, p. 131).
While Germany played the role of the responsible adult, Greece played the role of the reckless teenager. Unfortunately for Germany, it could not simply allow Greece and other economically failing EU members to collapse, because of the deep interconnections among their economies — including, but not limited to, the shared euro currency. As a result, Germany was compelled to provide the lion's share of bailout funding for Greece, Hungary, Latvia, Romania, Ireland, Portugal, Cyprus, and Spain (Peng, 2014, p. 131).
Benefits and Costs of the Euro as a Common Currency
The euro offers quite a few benefits. First, the shared currency among numerous European countries allows for unity, cooperation, and price transparency: for example, the president of the euro summit reports to the European Parliament after every summit, and member parliaments regularly confer with one another (Crum, 2013, p. 622). Second, a shared currency makes travel among member countries far easier by eliminating repeated, sometimes confusing and sometimes unfair currency conversions (Crum, 2013, p. 616). Third, the common currency provides a relatively stable monetary environment across international boundaries, with comparatively low inflation, low interest rates, and easier international trade (Crum, 2013, p. 617). Finally, the common currency gives member nations better protection against external economic shocks that might otherwise cause a country with an isolated national currency to collapse (Crum, 2013, p. 624). Taken together, the idea of a common currency among the EU's member countries has delivered significant benefits to hundreds of millions of Europeans.
Even as the euro has benefited the EU, it has also proved to have serious drawbacks. Despite the common currency, there are obvious differences in economic performance among EU members that have highlighted political differences, erected new barriers, and undermined national autonomy (Crum, 2013, p. 626). Germany has been financially stellar while Greece has been abysmal (Peng, 2014, pp. 130–131); consequently, their financial interconnectedness has forced more prosperous countries — Germany chief among them — to repeatedly bail out underperforming members. This dynamic has understandably led stronger countries to demand internal changes within weaker nations in order to prevent future economic disaster (Crum, 2013, p. 622).
Viewed through the lens of the common currency, the bailouts make sense, the demands for greater austerity make sense, and yet the weaker nations' insistence on preserving national autonomy also makes sense. The eurozone crisis has thus increased international cooperation while simultaneously intensifying international tension. In sum, the euro has been a double-edged sword for EU members, with significant benefits but significant drawbacks.
Conclusion
Across all four questions, a common theme emerges: economic interdependence creates both opportunity and obligation. Europe's bankruptcy frameworks would benefit from reform modeled on the American Chapter 11 approach. Germany's role as reluctant hegemon reflects the burden that interdependence places on the EU's strongest economy. And the euro, while unifying in many respects, has deepened the tensions arising from unequal economic performance among member states. In sum, the euro has been a double-edged sword for EU members, with significant benefits but significant drawbacks.
Works Cited
Carroll, L., & Youngman, C. (2015, September 21). Fact-checking claims about Donald Trump's four bankruptcies. Retrieved March 20, 2016, from PolitiFact: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/sep/21/carly-fiorina/trumps-four-bankruptcies/
Crum, B. (2013). Saving the euro at the cost of democracy? Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(4), 614–630.
Peng, M. W. (2014). Global strategic management (3rd ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.