This paper examines public finance challenges facing African nations and evaluates property taxation as a revenue source alongside alternative policy approaches. While property taxes avoid taxing the poorest citizens' income and consumption, they risk creating rural-urban class conflict and perpetuating educational inequality when tied to local funding. The paper argues that fighting corruption and investing in education represent more sustainable long-term strategies for attracting foreign investment and building human capital than property tax expansion alone.
Financially-strapped African nations must make difficult choices when calculating the opportunity costs of different decisions regarding how to finance their development. The goals of this hypothetical African nation are to encourage personal savings among citizens while also promoting foreign investment. One proposed reform has been to institute a property tax. While property taxes have been frequently used in the United States to fund education, this paper will suggest alternative prioritization to accomplish national goals more effectively.
Property taxes are often controversial as a source of economic revenue. On one hand, they have the advantage of not taxing the income or consumption of the poorest members of society. There is the presumption that those who are able to own property have at least some subsistence income. However, merely because someone owns a modest amount of property does not necessarily mean they are wealthy. Such a proposal could result in undue taxation upon poorer, small-scale subsistence farmers.
Those with property (usually residents in agrarian locations) might begin to resent those living in urban areas, creating class conflict. Using property taxes to fund local initiatives such as education is particularly problematic, given that this inevitably means more funds will be allocated to wealthier districts which need them the least. The result is a system that entrenches inequality rather than addressing it.
In China (another developing world nation which has experienced rapid prosperity growth), there has been considerable criticism of the government for being overly reliant upon selling land as a source of revenue. It has been suggested that property taxes should be used as an alternative source of financing investment in infrastructure. As researchers note:
"There is no doubt that revenue from land sales has been the backbone of local government coffers. The problems with this are obvious. There is a limit to the quantity of sellable land. Local governments' fiscal decisions are often made on the assumption that land prices will continue to appreciate. When property prices do not go up anymore, the trading volume of land will drop and severely affect the spending ability of local governments" (Young & Xia, 2013).
However, the fact that land value determines revenue is a problem with property taxes as well. If land values decline, so will revenue, undermining budget stability at the critical moment when public services are most needed.
Corruption exercises a considerable drain upon most African economies. One reason there is strong reluctance among Western investors is the tremendous costs of dealing with corruption in the region. Corruption tends to produce a variety of negative socio-economic and political outcomes:
"Corruption tends to produce a variety of negative socio-economic and political outcomes, such as socio-economic underdevelopment (e.g., an increase in income inequality and a reduction in productivity, GDP per capita, economic growth), political instability and poor public sector infrastructure" (Dimant, Krieger, & Meierrieks, 2013).
Corruption—such as needing to bribe officials to start local businesses, skimming off various taxes and regulatory fees, and nepotism in civil service appointments—creates cynicism among the local population about the political process and the potential for reform through participation. People are less likely to save money if they feel the economy is unstable and unlikely to honor their commitment. They may instead move their capital abroad.
Foreign businesses are reluctant to invest in highly corrupt nations because of the costs of doing business there. Talented citizens are also less likely to remain in corrupt countries because they believe their abilities are less likely to be rewarded based on merit. As researchers document, "Corruption negatively impacts the quality of and the return to education. For instance, by impairing economic growth and increasing the probability of becoming unemployed, corruption reduces the workers' expected return to human capital" (Dimant, Krieger, & Meierrieks, 2013).
Fighting corruption requires strict enforcement of existing laws against such activities. People will continue to engage in corrupt practices if they know they will not be prosecuted. The government should appoint an anti-corruption taskforce to highlight and investigate the worst potential abuses. This effort can also facilitate collection of existing taxes by reducing corrupt officials' skimming of revenues, effectively increasing public resources without raising tax rates.
A serious problem for developing African nations is that taxing wealthier outside businesses can curtail growth, but shifting the economic burden to impoverished residents is likewise financially unsustainable and ethically questionable. All state dollars must be carefully spent and designed to yield dividends on investment. One investment, however, that does "keep on giving" is education: it is less costly than infrastructure investment and pays greater dividends in the long term.
Education has yielded impressive dividends for both China and India. A highly-educated, high-tech sector in both nations has meant a spike in foreign investment, driven partly by lower labor costs relative to developed nations. "In 2014, many countries in Africa are still in need of development in many sectors: education is poor, healthcare has to be built from scratch, and administration is slow" (Andre, 2014).
Educated citizens are needed to attract businesses from abroad, to improve public infrastructure and health, and to competently staff government offices—all vital components of economic revitalization. An educated workforce increases both the quantity and quality of investment a nation can attract, creating a virtuous cycle of development. By contrast, property tax revenue without addressing underlying human capital deficits offers only short-term fiscal relief.
Ultimately, attracting investment to Africa requires an investment in its human capital in the form of fighting corruption and investing in education. Simply raising property taxes, even if channeled to a worthy goal such as infrastructure investment, will not address the complex needs of developing nations regarding their need for human capital. The most effective public finance strategy combines strict anti-corruption enforcement with sustained educational investment, creating the institutional trust and skilled workforce that sustainable economic growth demands.
You’re 90% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.