This paper compares two landmark works on European-Indian contact in colonial North America: James Axtell's The Invasion Within and William Cronon's Changes in the Land. While Axtell employs ethnohistory to examine how English, French, and Native cultures contested one another's spiritual and cultural identities, Cronon investigates how differing ecological practices revealed deeper cultural values. The paper argues that despite their contrasting methodologies — one focused on inner spiritual conflict, the other on environmental change — both authors share a common conclusion: the contours of modern American civilization were fundamentally shaped by the complex, often destructive, interchange between Native Americans and European colonizers.
The paper demonstrates comparative textual analysis across historiographical works. Rather than treating each book separately, it organizes its discussion thematically — thesis, method, argumentation, evidence — to highlight how two different scholarly frameworks (ethnohistory vs. ecological history) can illuminate the same historical event from complementary angles.
The paper opens with an overview of both books and their shared purpose, then distinguishes their individual theses and methodologies. It proceeds to evaluate how each author builds their argument, presenting key quotations as evidence. The final section renders a comparative judgment, favoring Cronon's ecological approach for its originality, and closes with a brief synthesis connecting both works to the formation of modern American civilization.
James Axtell and William Cronon analyze, in their respective works, essential aspects of the first interaction and exchange between the Native American peoples who inhabited North America and the Europeans who colonized them following Columbus's arrival. Axtell's The Invasion Within: The Contest of Cultures in Colonial North America focuses on the way in which three main groups — the Native Indians, the English, and the French — attempted mutual conversion, each struggling to impose its cultural identity upon the others. Axtell advocates that ethnohistory is the best instrument for examining the confluence of these three cultures. He focuses on the way each nation perceived the others and how they each struggled to impose their own worldview. As the title of the work indicates, its main contention is that the "invasion" of North America was far more than a political or economic conquest; it was, in fact, a contest between the cultural identities of the three nations that encountered one another. According to Axtell, the invasion touched the very essence of each culture — its inner, spiritual nature.
William Cronon's Changes in the Land: Indians, Colonists and the Ecology of New England, on the other hand, reveals a very different historical perspective: the author investigates the first contact between Native Americans and Europeans through an analysis of their differing management of the ecological system. Cronon's main assumption is that the relationship between the environment and the inhabitants of a given territory is crucial to understanding that culture's particular views and lifestyle. Although the two books propose essentially different approaches to their shared subject, they ultimately arrive at a common conclusion: both texts argue that American civilization today is largely a result of the way in which the two nations first interacted and of the web of mutual influences that followed.
The theses of the two books have different scopes but aim at the same purpose — to analyze how the first contact between Natives and colonizers influenced the future development of America as a nation. Axtell's main thesis is that the initial contact between the three nations was marked by cultural contest. Each group — the Natives, the English, and the French — set out to convert the others to their own creeds and customs. Axtell emphasizes that what was fundamentally at stake in this contest was nothing less than cultural identity.
Axtell focuses his argument on the reconstruction of the first contact between cultures and on the impact each had on the other: "The impact the major competing cultures of Eastern North America — English, French, and Indian — had had on each other, especially when they set out consciously to educate or convert their rivals."3 According to Axtell, the conflict between Natives and Europeans resided primarily in the contest between two opposing concepts of spiritual power: "For many natives and Europeans the frontier conflict remained primarily a contest between two concepts of spiritual power."4 He also argues that, as spiritual missionaries, the Indians were the most effective educators, followed by the French and only lastly by the English. Indians proved themselves "psychologically if not numerically… the best cultural missionaries and educators on the continent."5 The English had the least cultural impact, while the Indians had the greatest. Axtell's analysis is therefore a direct investigation of cultural identities in contact, focused on the inner, spiritual core of each nation.
Cronon's approach stands in apparent contrast to Axtell's. Rather than focusing on the spiritual history of the two nations, Cronon concentrates on the external, material dimensions of the encounter — specifically, how each culture manipulated its natural environment. His main target is to challenge the common assumption that Europeans first landed in a pristine, untouched wilderness. Cronon alludes to the tendency of historians to regard America as a virgin land uninfluenced by human hands before European arrival: "It is tempting to believe that when Europeans arrived in the New World they confronted Virgin Land, the Forest Primeval, a wilderness which had existed for eons uninfluenced by human hands."2
Cronon then proceeds to demonstrate that the Indians had, in fact, modified their natural environment substantially — the key difference being in the methods used. The Indians manipulated the land with an instinct for nature and its needs, thereby managing to preserve and enrich it. The Europeans, by contrast, abused nature by subjecting it to economic purposes. Cronon thus analyzes the differences between the two cultures through an examination of their distinct methods of land management. His main thesis holds that the Western colonizers introduced the concept of "property," which is the primary driver of the subsequent radical changes in the country's ecosystems: "English property systems encouraged colonists to regard the products of the land — not to mention the land itself — as commodities."6 Treating nature as property was, in Cronon's view, the principal cause of the disappearance of the initial ecological abundance under the destructive force of colonization.
The two books make strong arguments for their respective views of how present-day American civilization was initially formed. Both texts attempt historical reconstruction, from two different perspectives, of the first contact between the two cultures. Although both authors make compelling and interesting points about the history of colonization, Cronon's book appears more remarkable in terms of argumentation and originality. Axtell, while thorough, does not always bring fully cogent arguments in support of his ethnohistorical approach. Cronon, on the other hand, makes a more striking argument about how the two cultures first interacted. By focusing on an external, indirect aspect — the changes in the ecosystem that followed colonization — he manages to illuminate a defining characteristic of present-day American society: the way in which initial ecological abundance was converted into waste: "Ecological abundance and economic prodigality went hand in hand: the people of plenty were a people of waste."7
You’re 61% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.