Evidence-Based Practice for Reducing Medication Errors
This paper reviews a quality improvement initiative undertaken by a 35-bed pulmonary-medical unit that was experiencing a high rate of preventable medication errors. Drawing on Federwisch et al. (2014), the paper examines how nursing leadership used incident report analysis to identify interruptions during medication administration as the primary cause of errors. It describes the evidence-based strategies adopted — including "Do Not Disturb" signage, unit secretary call screening, and bedside rounding — modeled on the aviation industry's sterile cockpit rule. The paper maps the initiative onto the FADE quality improvement framework (Focus, Analyze, Develop, Execute, Evaluate) and reports outcomes, including a 45% reduction in medication errors despite a near-doubling of medications administered.
- Introduction: The Scope of Medication Errors: National scope, cost, and definition of medication errors
- Identifying the Root Cause: Interruptions During Administration: Unit incident review reveals interruptions as primary cause
- The Sterile Cockpit Rule and Evidence-Based Strategies: Aviation-inspired rule and hospital strategies reviewed
- Implementing a Two-Pronged Improvement Program: Signage, call screening, and bedside rounding adopted
- Program Outcomes and Evaluation: Follow-up surveys show 45% reduction in errors
- Applying the FADE Quality Improvement Model: Case mapped onto Focus, Analyze, Develop, Execute, Evaluate
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its argument in concrete statistics — cost figures, error counts, and percentage reductions — giving the analysis measurable credibility.
- It uses a real clinical case (a 35-bed pulmonary-medical unit) to illustrate abstract QI concepts, making the discussion practically applicable.
- By explicitly mapping the hospital's initiative onto the FADE model at the end, the paper demonstrates command of theoretical frameworks while staying anchored in evidence.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied framework analysis: it narrates a real-world quality improvement project and then retrospectively aligns each phase of the project to a named QI model (FADE). This technique shows the reader how theoretical frameworks are operationalized in clinical settings, bridging academic coursework and professional practice.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a definition and epidemiological context for medication errors, then moves into a case description covering problem identification, literature review, strategy selection, implementation, and outcome measurement. The final section reframes the entire case using the FADE QI model, providing a structured theoretical lens through which to interpret the narrative. This two-part structure — case narrative followed by model application — is a common and effective pattern in quality improvement writing at the undergraduate level.
Introduction: The Scope of Medication Errors
The National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention defines a medication error as a preventable event that may lead to patient harm or inappropriate medication use while the medication is in the control of the consumer, patient, or healthcare professional (Federwisch et al., 2014). According to the Institute of Medicine (IOM), approximately 1.5 million adverse events that could have been prevented occur in the United States every year due to medication errors (Federwisch et al., 2014). It is estimated that medication-related errors cost US hospitals approximately $3.5 billion annually, with each event increasing hospital costs by at least $5,857 (Federwisch et al., 2014).
Identifying the Root Cause: Interruptions During Administration
The article under review focuses on the efforts of a 35-bed pulmonary-medical unit that consistently reported a high number of medication errors — as many as 21 in one quarter — to reduce that number (Federwisch et al., 2014). The nursing leadership at the facility first conducted a review of unit-specific information and incident reports to identify the most common causes of medication errors. The review showed that most medication errors occurred due to distractions and interruptions during administration. Healthcare professionals committed twice as many medication errors when interrupted than when there were no distractions or interruptions (Federwisch et al., 2014). Family members' inquiries, physicians' and patients' requests, alarms, and site occlusions were the most common sources of interruption (Federwisch et al., 2014).
The Sterile Cockpit Rule and Evidence-Based Strategies
In response, the hospital initiated a program modeled on the aviation industry's sterile cockpit rule, which forbids non-essential activity and conversations among crew members during critical phases of flight such as takeoff, taxiing, and landing (Federwisch et al., 2014). The hospital conducted research to explore how different nursing units had adopted the sterile cockpit rule and to assess the efficacy of their strategies.
Hospitals had used a range of strategies in applying the rule, including designating "no-interruption zones" by affixing red duct tape to the floor around medication carts, having nurses wear yellow safety vests to alert their colleagues that medication administration was in progress and that the nurse was not to be interrupted, and placing "Do Not Disturb" signs above medication carts and dispensing machines (Federwisch et al., 2014). The findings indicated that these strategies effectively reduced the frequency of interruption by 40.9%, 52%, and 27%, respectively (Federwisch et al., 2014). However, the wearing of vests had attracted significant resistance from nurses, who found it difficult to put on their vests at the right time.
References
Federwisch, M., Ramos, H., & Adams, S. C. (2014). The sterile cockpit: An effective approach to reducing medication errors — How one nursing unit tried to limit interruptions during medication administration by adapting the aviation industry rule. Cultivating Quality, 114(2), 47–55.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.