Fair Housing Act: Normative Policy Evaluation and Reform
This practicum report evaluates the Fair Housing Act (FHA) through a normative policy analysis methodology, drawing on observation and literature review conducted at a housing agency. The report confirms that the agency complies with applicable state and federal housing regulations. It then identifies structural gaps in how HUD administers fair housing obligations and presents four major recommendations: restructuring the jurisdiction-wide Analysis of Impediments procedure with clear metrics and accountability measures; improving data collection guidelines including demographic and disability data; strengthening public participation requirements; and enhancing enforcement through Opportunity Impact Statements and random audits. The analysis situates these recommendations within broader public policy theory, emphasizing that normative policy evaluation is prescriptive, aiming to improve general welfare rather than merely describe existing procedures.
- Introduction and Overview of the Fair Housing Act: Scope, history, and coverage of the FHA
- Significance of the Practicum and Learning Objectives: Why fair housing matters and what was learned
- Methods and Normative Policy Analysis Framework: Data collection approach and normative analysis rationale
- Restructuring the Analysis of Impediments Procedure: Recommended reforms to metrics, data, and accountability
- Ensuring Compliance in Federally Funded Projects: OIS tool and fund-recipient compliance requirements
- Improving Enforcement and Funding Decisions: Audits, monitoring, and enforcement mechanisms
- Conclusion and Summary of Recommendations: Agency compliance confirmed; four key reforms outlined
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The report grounds its prescriptive recommendations in established policy analysis theory, explicitly contrasting normative and descriptive approaches — a sophistication that strengthens the academic framing of a practicum document.
- Recommendations are specific and actionable, referencing concrete regulatory mechanisms (24 C.F.R. § 91.105, OIS requirements, IRS-style audit models) that demonstrate familiarity with the actual policy landscape.
- The paper integrates primary observation data with a structured literature review, giving dual evidentiary grounding that is appropriate for a graduate-level practicum report.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates normative policy analysis — a prescriptive mode of evaluation that asks not just what a policy does, but what it should do to enhance public welfare. By applying this framework to a real agency setting, the author bridges academic theory and professional practice, showing how policy analysis methods function in applied contexts.
Structure breakdown
The report follows a practicum-report structure: an executive summary, contextual introduction, statement of significance, learning objectives, methods section with methodological justification, and a detailed recommendations section organized hierarchically (jurisdiction-wide reforms, project-level compliance, enforcement improvements). It closes with a synthesis conclusion that ties recommendations back to the original policy goals.
Introduction and Overview of the Fair Housing Act
The Fair Housing Act forbids discrimination, limitation, or preference on the basis of gender, race, nationality, disability, family status, color, or any intention to display such discrimination, preferences, or limitations. The United States Congress approved this federal act, which falls under the jurisdiction of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), in 1968 and again in 1988 (Hoosier State Press Association, 2019). The Indiana Fair Act was also approved in 1990. Together, these two acts affect the following parties: renters or sellers of a property, agents participating in the renting and sale of property, and advertising media. A lawsuit involving advertising can be filed against the individual responsible for writing and placing an advertisement, as well as the owner and management of the property, and the publication or newspaper involved. The Fair Housing Act does not apply to buildings with fewer than four units in which the owner resides, or to those who own single-family homes (Hoosier State Press Association, 2019). The Act becomes relevant when a property owner uses a broker and also engages in unfair advertising.
This practicum report assessed the Fair Housing Act via a normative policy evaluation methodology. Data was collected through observation and literature review of materials including policy guidelines and records from the housing agency. The assessment of programs and processes confirms that the Housing Agency complies with all applicable state and federal housing conditions, including the Fair Housing Act. Nevertheless, in order to improve the Act and make it more accommodating for smaller groups, four recommendations are proposed: (1) HUD should supervise and impose grantees' jurisdiction-wide fair housing responsibilities through a revised Analysis of Impediments procedure; (2) HUD should require fund recipients to carry out and present periodic evaluations of the Act as well as other federally protected equal opportunity effects of particular activities and programs undertaken with federal resources; (3) both program-specific and jurisdiction-wide processes should include housing opportunity indicators supported by established research and experience; and (4) HUD should supplement technical assistance and submission requirements to fund recipients with a rigorous system of surprise, periodic audits of a subset of recipients and applicants selected through random sampling and other relevant factors.
Significance of the Practicum and Learning Objectives
Every government agency and jurisdiction should attend to fair housing responsibilities. This project concentrates on fair housing responsibilities for departments of housing. A city's implementation of fair housing policy encounters practical considerations and several varying needs that already influence city decision-makers and personnel. Societies are continually changing — they are becoming more racially and ethnically diverse, with immigrant families, people of color, and individuals with disabilities making up considerable portions of communities. This raises the likelihood of fair housing concerns emerging. An increased number of people of color are now residing in suburbs, and the proportion of those living in poverty is also increasing. Cities expose themselves to liability if they do not understand their duties under fair housing policy, and they must be prepared when unanticipated situations arise requiring a fair housing response or evaluation.
This practicum provided the opportunity to review current procedures and policies, resulting in a procedures and policy manual that addressed issues of non-conformance, challenges of application, and policy restriction concerns experienced by the housing agency. The course material reinforced that examining social issues can be far more complicated than initially apparent. A given issue may have several underlying and systemic dimensions that require equal attention.
Public policy is created in response to issues that need to be addressed by decision-makers. These policies take the form of laws and regulations and can be created by any government body, from the city council to the president. The aims of public policy are often inseparable from their sources. Both government and public policy help realize societal needs as well as basic responsibilities (Dye, 2017). Policies determine how communities, states, and countries manage their resources and assist in maintaining social order. The policy-making process is unending, chaotic, and nonlinear, and does not have any defined start or end point. Those engaged in the process may follow general procedures described in six phases of the policy creation process (National Collaborating Center for Healthy Public Policy, 2013).
As a practitioner, the primary goal was to gain first-hand knowledge of policy execution and the complete processes involved in evaluating a policy for modification to match the day-to-day needs of those it intends to serve or protect. This included understanding the specific and complex procedures involved in modifying policies and how the numerous facets of policy execution influence one another, and how systems respond to changes in any of these facets. Additionally, this report is intended to serve as a useful and informative contribution to the Fair Housing Act through the recommendations included herein.
References
Chan, C. (2016). Separate and suffering: The damaging effects of residential segregation on metropolitan economies. Chicago Policy Review (Online).
Cochran, C. L., & Malone, E. F. (2005). Public policy: Perspectives and choices. Lynne Rienner.
Dye, T. R. (2017). Understanding public policy. Pearson.
HUD (US Department of Housing and Urban Development). (1996). Fair housing planning guide, Volume 1. HUD.
HUD (US Department of Housing and Urban Development). (2017). AFFH-T user guide: Affirmatively furthering fair housing data and mapping tool v. 4.0. HUD.
Kanter, A. S. (1994). A home of one's own: The Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 and housing discrimination against people with mental disabilities. American University Law Review, 43, 925.
Kochera, A. (2002). Accessibility and visitability features in single-family homes: A review of state and local activity. Public Policy Institute, AARP.
Li, H., Campbell, H., & Fernandez, S. (2013). Residential segregation, spatial mismatch and economic growth across US metropolitan areas. Urban Studies, 50(13), 2642–2660.
National Collaborating Center for Healthy Public Policy. (2013). Public policy models and their usefulness in public health: The stages model. Retrieved from https://www.ncchpp.ca/docs/ModeleEtapesPolPubliques_EN.pdf
Pearl, L. D. (2014). Community development and fair housing: A work still in progress. Housing Policy Debate, 24(1), 288–296.
Robert, C., & Zeckhauser, R. (2011). The methodology of normative policy analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30(3), 613–643.
Smith, R. (2016). A seat at the table: Changing the governing structure of Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program administration to reflect civil rights values and fair housing. Columbia Journal of Race and Law, 6, 193.
The Opportunity Agenda. (2010). Reforming HUD's regulations to affirmatively further fair housing. Retrieved from https://www.opportunityagenda.org/explore/resources-publications/reforming-huds-regulations-affirmatively-further-fair-housing
Trasviña, J. (2011). Let's put an end to housing discrimination. The White House. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2011/05/12/let-s-put-end-housing-discrimination
Turner, M. A., & Acevedo-Garcia, D. (2005). The benefits of housing mobility: A review of the research evidence. In P. Tegeler, M. Cunningham, & M. A. Turner (Eds.), Keeping the promise: Preserving and enhancing housing mobility in the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program. Poverty and Race Research Action Council.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.