This paper examines Florida's significant role in U.S. agricultural production, highlighting the state's share of national output in citrus, sugarcane, tomatoes, and other crops as of 2005–2006. It then situates state-level trade within the broader context of global food trade, explaining how comparative advantage, climate, and irrigation resources shape international agricultural exchange. The paper also analyzes the economic implications of food trade, focusing on how export and import balances affect Gross Domestic Product. Drawing on USDA and CIA World Factbook data, the paper argues that while the United States could survive without global food trade, participation in it remains economically beneficial.
In 2005, Florida accounted for a large portion of U.S. produce production. According to the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, the state's share of national output included:
Four out of five of Florida's top agricultural exports are produce, as shown in the table below (USDA State Fact Sheets: Florida).
Trade between states is very important. Florida, a state rich in agricultural products, uses exports to help boost farm prices and income, while supporting approximately 20,100 jobs both on and off the farm in food processing, storage, and transportation. Exports remain vital to Florida's agricultural and statewide economy. The state's reliance on agricultural exports was 24 percent in 2006 (USDA, Trade and Agriculture: What's at Stake for Florida). Other states with climates not suited for agriculture take advantage of trade to increase access to agricultural products and to enhance the price and income of their own exported goods.
Global food trade is important for the same reasons that interstate trade is important: to expand affordable access to agricultural products. On a worldwide basis, comparative advantages and disadvantages in production can often be more pronounced due to differences in climate conditions and irrigation resources. The United States would most likely survive without global food trade, since it exports more agricultural products (9.2 percent) than it imports (4.9 percent) (CIA World Factbook). However, the country would be worse off because it would forfeit the benefits of trading with countries that hold comparative advantages in producing certain agricultural goods; some products could become scarce, more costly, or unavailable altogether.
"How trade balances affect national GDP"
"Breakdown of U.S. trade categories and values"
You’re 43% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.