Freedom as Natural and Divine Right in the 18th–19th Centuries
This paper examines how the concept of freedom evolved during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, shifting away from its medieval religious associations with free will toward a secular understanding rooted in natural rights or divine endowment. Drawing on three primary sources — the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen, the U.S. Declaration of Independence, and Immanuel Kant's "Theory and Practice" — the paper argues that Enlightenment thinkers relocated the source of human freedom from God's moral law to either nature itself or a Creator who granted rights independent of religious doctrine. The paper also traces how this shift made socio-political philosophy, rather than theology, the primary arena for defining the limits of liberty.
- Introduction: The Shifting Nature of Freedom: Thesis and historical break from medieval free will
- Freedom as a Natural Right: The Declaration of the Rights of Man: French Declaration links freedom to nature
- Divine Endowment and the U.S. Declaration of Independence: Founders attribute rights to a Creator
- Kant and the State as Arbiter of Freedom: Kant relocates freedom from Church to state
- Conclusion: From Theology to Political Philosophy: State replaces Church as freedom's authority
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper anchors every analytical claim directly to a quoted primary source, giving the argument concrete textual grounding rather than relying on paraphrase or secondary interpretation.
- It establishes a clear historical contrast — medieval free will versus Enlightenment liberty — that frames all three examples within a single coherent narrative arc.
- The discussion of the U.S. Declaration of Independence is notably nuanced: rather than treating the "Creator" language as straightforwardly religious, the paper explains it as a strategic concession to an audience still attached to religious ideas.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the use of parallel primary-source analysis: each document is read against the same interpretive question (what is the source of freedom?), allowing comparison across different national and philosophical contexts without losing focus on the central argument.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by stating its thesis and presenting the three supporting quotations. It then develops the historical background explaining the break from medieval religious conceptions of freedom. Three body paragraphs analyze each primary source in turn — the French Declaration, the U.S. Declaration, and Kant — before a brief conclusion ties the analysis back to the thesis about the state replacing the Church as the arbiter of freedom.
Introduction: The Shifting Nature of Freedom
The nature of freedom in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries was considered a natural right in some cases and a divine right in others. When it was useful, people appealed to the idea of a Creator endowing humanity with certain "unalienable rights," and when nature was viewed as the source of life, the rights of man were considered something that simply was — self-evident and requiring no further justification.
Three passages from primary source texts provide evidence for this claim:
"Men are born and remain free and equal in rights… hence the exercise of the natural rights of each man has no limits except those which assure to the other members of the society the enjoyment of the same rights" — from the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" — from the U.S. Declaration of Independence.
"The freedom of every member of the state as a human being. The equality of each with every other as a subject. The independence of every member of a commonwealth as a citizen." — from "Theory and Practice" by Immanuel Kant.
The idea of freedom in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries was divorced from the centuries that preceded them — centuries in which the concept of freedom was attached to the concept of "free will" and thought of primarily in a spiritual, religious sense. With the Protestant Reformation, the break from the religious doctrines of the Middle Ages, and the rise of the Enlightenment and Romantic Eras came a new approach to freedom. Freedom was understood not as a choice one had between doing good and evil, but rather as the liberty to do as one desired. By the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the only constraint on freedom was the state and its laws — which is precisely why socio-economic and political philosophy became so important. What gave people their "freedom," however, was still debated.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.