Gender Discrimination in Employment: Law and Policy
This paper examines gender discrimination in employment, tracing the legal standards a litigant must meet to establish a prima facie case and surveying the major forms discrimination can take. It analyzes disparate treatment and disparate impact discrimination, discusses the role of cultural stereotypes and protectionist instincts — including pregnancy-based policies — and explores the bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) defense. The paper also outlines the EEOC complaint process, available remedies, and the limits of anti-discrimination law. It concludes that while legislation has reduced egregious forms of sex-based discrimination, lasting gender equality in the workplace ultimately requires social as well as legal change.
- Introduction to Gender Discrimination: Overview of gender discrimination's complexity and roots
- Establishing a Prima Facie Case: Legal elements required to prove discrimination
- Disparate Treatment and Disparate Impact: Two main forms of employment discrimination explained
- Bona Fide Occupational Qualifications (BFOQ): When gender-based hiring is legally permissible
- Filing a Complaint with the EEOC: EEOC complaint process, deadlines, and available remedies
- Limits of the Law and the Role of Society: Why social change must accompany legal reform
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It grounds abstract legal concepts in concrete case examples — such as International Union, UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc. and Wilson v. Southwest Airlines Co. — making doctrinal distinctions accessible and memorable.
- It moves logically from broad definitions to specific legal standards, then to procedural requirements and societal implications, giving the argument a clear, cumulative structure.
- The paper acknowledges the complexity of the issue by noting that some gender-based distinctions are legally permissible (BFOQ), avoiding an oversimplified treatment of discrimination law.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses doctrinal legal analysis — identifying statutory standards, applying them to case law, and drawing reasoned conclusions — while integrating policy critique. This dual approach allows the writer to both explain what the law does and evaluate whether it is sufficient, a skill central to legal studies and social-science writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a conceptual introduction framing the difficulty of combating gender discrimination. It then walks through the prima facie legal framework, distinguishes disparate treatment from disparate impact, examines BFOQ exceptions with supporting case examples, explains the EEOC filing process including key deadlines, and closes with a normative conclusion about the shared responsibility of law and society. Each section builds directly on the previous one.
Introduction to Gender Discrimination
Despite the best efforts of courts and lawmakers, a tremendous amount of discrimination continues to exist in employment situations. Gender discrimination involves any type of sex-based discrimination and may be the area that has been most difficult to combat through legal measures. This difficulty has at least two roots. First, like in all areas of discrimination, people have had to learn that gender stereotypes are harmful. Second, people have had to learn that gender stereotypes are incorrect — which is more difficult, because much of society continues to be invested in the gender status quo in a way that differs from other types of oppression.
The elevation of the traditionally feminine role plays a major part in gender discrimination, with prospective employers historically taking a protectionist stance against women in non-traditional jobs, and sometimes against women working outside the home at all. In addition, unlike racial discrimination, the biological differences between men and women mean that some professions will remain highly gender-biased despite intervening legislation and changing social mores. A further complicating factor is that gender discrimination can take many forms. It can involve employers instituting policies aimed at limiting the participation of one gender in a particular job. It can also involve sexual harassment, which can make sexual identity a liability in the workplace.
Establishing a Prima Facie Case
In order to understand gender discrimination, one must examine the legal hurdles a litigant faces when seeking to establish a prima facie case. First, a litigant must demonstrate that he or she is a member of the protected class. Because both men and women are protected from gender discrimination, this hurdle is easy for most litigants, but it has prevented some who base discrimination claims on sexual orientation from establishing a prima facie case. Second, a litigant must demonstrate that he or she experienced an adverse employment action. Third, the litigant must demonstrate that the adverse action was related to his or her protected status. Litigants do not have to show facially discriminatory laws or policies; they can also demonstrate how facially neutral policies have impacted them in a discriminatory manner to satisfy this burden.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.