This essay examines progress toward the United Nations Millennium Development Goal 3 (Promote Gender Equality and Empower Women) by comparing two least economically developed countries: Ethiopia and Indonesia. The analysis evaluates three sub-goals—educational gender parity, women's employment in non-agricultural sectors, and female parliamentary representation—using statistical measures and contextual factors including cultural beliefs, population dynamics, and post-conflict social change. While both countries show progress in some areas, significant disparities persist, particularly in higher education and parliamentary representation. The paper demonstrates that economic constraints and entrenched cultural values present major obstacles to achieving gender equality in developing nations.
Our world is filled with problems. As we recognize surfacing challenges, we look for solutions and set goals. These efforts occur at every level—from individuals to large organizations like the United Nations. The UN has established its own set of objectives known as the Millennium Development Goals, consisting of eight goals to be achieved by 2015 across eight different areas. With the deadline approaching, it is important to assess our current progress. This essay explores and compares the performance of two least economically developed countries (LEDCs)—Ethiopia and Indonesia—on one specific goal: Goal 3, "Promote Gender Equality and Empower Women."
This goal contains three sub-goals. The first addresses equal girls' enrollment in primary, secondary, and tertiary education, measured by gender parity indices. The second focuses on women's share of paid employment in the non-agricultural sector. The third examines female representation in national parliaments. By comparing these countries' progress across all three measures, we can understand both the barriers to and catalysts for gender equality in developing nations.
The first sub-goal measures gender parity in enrollment across all levels of education. Both countries are making good progress in primary education, with results higher than in previous years. Indonesia has achieved parity with a gender parity index of 1.02, while Ethiopia is close to parity at 0.91. However, as students advance to higher levels of education, both countries' values decline. In secondary education, Indonesia maintains near-parity at 1.00, while Ethiopia drops to 0.87. In tertiary education, both countries show a greater decrease and fall further from parity. Ethiopia experiences a more dramatic decline, dropping from 0.87 to 0.43, whereas Indonesia declines from 1.00 to 0.87. Indonesia's tertiary value remains above the regional average, while Ethiopia's falls below it.
Both countries' strong performance in primary education reflects increasing government and organizational programs designed to raise awareness about the importance of education. The decline in higher levels of education likely stems from financial constraints common to LEDCs. As children spend more years in school, financial requirements increase, making it harder for parents to support their child's education. Additionally, both countries hold deep-rooted cultural values and beliefs that place women's status lower than men's. Under such conditions, parents are more likely to prioritize their son's education over their daughter's.
Ethiopia's weaker performance compared to Indonesia reflects severe cultural obstacles. Ethiopia faces challenges including early marriage, female genital cutting practices, and violence against women. Early marriage forces young women into household work, while female genital cutting creates serious health threats that prevent school attendance. Violence and abuse cause physical and psychological harm, and the threat of such violence motivates parents to keep daughters home.
The second sub-goal measures women's share of paid employment in the non-agricultural sector. Both countries present positive results. Ethiopia has already achieved a high share of 41.6% of wage employment, exceeding the regional average. Indonesia shows a medium share of 32.9%, remaining below the regional average. Both countries increased their percentages from previous years, though Indonesia's percentage increase is higher than Ethiopia's despite Ethiopia's overall better performance.
Indonesia's lower percentage may be explained by several factors. Indonesia has a substantially larger population—approximately 2.5 times greater than Ethiopia's—which increases labor force size and makes employment more competitive. With greater population pressure, employment creation becomes more demanding. Additionally, Indonesia likely has more female agricultural workers than Ethiopia; since agricultural employment is not counted in this metric, a larger proportion of Indonesia's female workers are excluded from the calculation, artificially lowering the reported percentage.
Cultural factors also play a significant role. Patriarchal values deeply embedded in Indonesian society make it more likely for men to be hired over women in competitive labor markets. Both countries experienced conflict and war at the end of the twentieth century. In times of social upheaval, the role of women often expands significantly as communities mobilize all available labor. This instability also makes countries more receptive to new ideas, including gender equality and women's empowerment, explaining the improving values for both nations. Indonesia even had its first female president, Megawati, who took office in 2001. However, her presidency lost credibility due to inaction on many key issues, shifting public sentiment back toward traditional views of women's professional roles and dampening progress on this goal.
The third sub-goal examines women's representation in national parliaments, measured by the percentage of seats held by women. Neither country has met this goal, though both exceed the regional average. Ethiopia demonstrates stronger performance with a medium representation of 27.8% of parliamentary seats, compared to Indonesia's low representation of 18.6%. Both countries improved over time, but Ethiopia's increase of 1,289% reflects considerably greater effort than Indonesia's 50% increase.
The reason both countries fall short of the goal relates to persistent cultural values and stereotypes. Many in both societies maintain traditional views about domesticity and family authority, believing men should lead families and society while women manage household duties. It remains difficult for some to accept the image of women as strong, confident, and independent leaders. Ethiopia's rapid improvement may again reflect the consequences of conflict and desire for change following war. The experience with President Megawati in Indonesia similarly explains why Indonesia lags behind on this goal. Her unsuccessful presidency raised questions about women's decision-making abilities, particularly at the national level, slowing the country's progress on parliamentary representation.
Overall, both countries demonstrate similar patterns: each has achieved one sub-goal and nearly achieved another, while the third remains a challenge. However, this outcome is not entirely negative. It demonstrates that both nations are making genuine efforts toward the broader objective of gender equality and women's empowerment. Countries are implementing change and identifying what needs to transform. As evidence shows, our world is gradually changing in terms of gender equality, though progress remains uneven and incomplete, particularly in developing economies facing resource constraints and deeply entrenched cultural practices.
"Summary of findings and overall progress assessment"
You’re 98% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.