Gender's Impact on Bureaucratic Performance and Public Administration
This paper examines how gender influences key organizational functions within public bureaucracies, including performance, accountability, team building, morale, and customer service. Drawing on Camilla Stivers's critique of institutional discrimination, Frederick W. Taylor's and Elton Mayo's historically dismissive views of women in the workplace, and Montgomery Van Wart's broader discussion of elite-system beliefs, the paper traces the gap between formally stated gender equality and the discriminatory practices that persist in public institutions. It concludes by presenting Stivers's counter-argument that women are fully capable of sustaining and enhancing all five organizational performance criteria.
- Introduction: Gender Equality and Persistent Discrimination: Gap between stated equality and actual workplace discrimination
- Theoretical Framework and Organizational Performance Criteria: Five criteria used to evaluate gender's organizational impact
- Taylor and Mayo on Women in Organizational Settings: Classic theorists argue women undermine organizational efficiency
- Van Wart and the Role of Elite Belief Systems: Elite belief systems underpin gender and racial discrimination
- Stivers's Counter-Argument: Women's Contributions to Organizational Performance: Stivers refutes claims and affirms women's organizational value
- Conclusion: Discriminatory assumptions challenged by evidence and Stivers
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It frames a persistent real-world problem — the gap between stated gender equality and actual discriminatory practice — in the opening paragraph, giving the argument immediate relevance.
- It marshals multiple named theorists (Taylor, Mayo, Van Wart, Stivers) as competing voices, giving the analysis a genuine scholarly dialogue rather than a one-sided presentation.
- The five organizational criteria (performance, accountability, team building, morale, customer service) serve as a consistent analytical thread that ties all sources together and allows structured comparison.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses a dialectical structure: it first builds the historical case against women in bureaucracies through direct quotation and paraphrase of primary theorists, then systematically refutes that case using Stivers. This "thesis–antithesis" approach is an effective way to show critical engagement with contested scholarly positions.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a contextual claim about gender discrimination in public institutions, introduces the five organizational criteria as the evaluative lens, then moves through three sets of sources in sequence — Taylor and Mayo (hostile), Van Wart (contextualizing), and Stivers (refuting). The conclusion circles back to Stivers's affirmative position. The structure is lean and logical, suited to a short analytical essay at the undergraduate level.
Introduction: Gender Equality and Persistent Discrimination
The world has evolved significantly over the past several decades, and evidence of this evolution is apparent not only in globalization and technological advancement, but also in the realm of human relations, treatment, and rights. Major progress has been made in addressing the historical discrimination faced by certain groups, including women. While the formally stated position in most democratic societies is that men and women play an equal part in public offices and that entry into such positions is not limited by gender, the actual situation frequently indicates otherwise.
Camilla Stivers (2002) finds that discrimination against women continues to occur within public institutions on grounds such as the belief that men do a better job of managing positions, people, and situations, or that women are distracted by their domestic responsibilities and therefore perform at inferior levels. The number of women occupying public positions remains significantly lower than the number of men, and the perceived explanation is that only exceptional women have the ability to perform jobs that were initially designed — in practice, if not in principle — for men.
Theoretical Framework and Organizational Performance Criteria
In this context of forwarded equality but practiced discrimination, a question arises regarding the actual ways in which gender impacts specific organizational functions — such as performance, accountability, team building, morale, and customer service. Despite being focused on several broader perspectives of public administration, Brian Fry's Mastering Public Administration: From Max Weber to Dwight Waldo (1989) contains useful references to how genders are perceived within the administrative community — perceptions that help illuminate this question.
Taylor and Mayo on Women in Organizational Settings
One of Fry's essays quotes Frederick W. Taylor's view on the supposed incapacity of women to perform effectively in an organized context: women are described as "less efficient than men, less regular in their attendance, and should look forward to getting married." In other words, Taylor's conclusion is that women have a negative impact on all five organizational performance criteria — personal achievement, accountability, team building, morale, and customer service.
A similar view is shared by Elton Mayo, who argues that women tend to talk too much among themselves, fail to become properly subordinate, and as a result distract the attention of the entire group. According to this perspective, women negatively affect concentration and, by extension, performance and the other organizational criteria under consideration.
Conclusion
The body of scholarship surveyed here reveals a long-standing tension between the discriminatory assumptions embedded in classical administrative theory and the more evidence-grounded arguments made by contemporary scholars such as Stivers. While Taylor, Mayo, and the elite-systems thinking described by Van Wart collectively characterized women as organizational liabilities, Stivers's work demonstrates that these characterizations are unfounded. Women are fully capable of contributing positively across all key dimensions of organizational performance within public bureaucracies.
References
Fry, B. R. (1989). Mastering Public Administration: From Max Weber to Dwight Waldo. Chatham House Publishers.
Stivers, C. (2002). Gender Images in Public Administration: Legitimacy and the Administrative State (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Van Wart, M. (1998). Changing Public Sector Values. Taylor and Francis.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.