Gender Inequality Among Female Athletic Trainers in Academia
This paper examines gender inequality among female athletic trainers (ATs) in academic settings, drawing on a large-scale survey study by Kahanov et al. (2010). Although women comprise 48% of National Athletic Trainers' Association membership, they hold only one-third of collegiate AT positions. The paper summarizes survey findings from 405 female ATs, exploring how parenthood affects employment decisions, career satisfaction, and work-life balance. It highlights that many women altered their job settings or hours after having children, and that the struggle to balance professional and family obligations — compounded by irregular work schedules — is a central driver of gender disparities in academic athletic training.
- Gender Inequality in Athletic Training: Women underrepresented in collegiate AT positions
- Survey Methods: Survey sample size and respondent demographics
- Impact of Parenthood on AT Careers: How childbirth changed employment and hours
- Career Satisfaction and Family Planning: Satisfaction levels and reasons for delaying parenthood
- Balancing Career and Family Obligations: Stress of dual obligations and support needs
- Summary and Recommendations: Survey limits, broader context, and solutions
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper presents a clear, testable hypothesis — that family obligations contribute to gender bias in academic athletic training — and consistently evaluates survey findings against it.
- It distinguishes meaningfully between parent and non-parent respondents, revealing nuanced differences in perception and experience rather than treating the sample as uniform.
- The summary section honestly acknowledges the limitations of survey methodology while still drawing defensible conclusions, demonstrating critical thinking about evidence quality.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of primary source synthesis: it distills key quantitative findings (percentages, mean age, response rates) and integrates them with qualitative themes from essay questions, giving readers both statistical scope and interpretive depth. Citing page numbers alongside standard references strengthens scholarly credibility.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a conventional social-science report structure: an introduction establishing the problem and hypothesis, a brief methods section, a results-and-conclusions section organized thematically, and a summary that situates findings in broader context. Each section is concise and purposeful, making the argument easy to follow despite the paper's brevity.
Gender Inequality in Athletic Training
There is evidence of gender inequality in the profession of academic athletic trainers (ATs). For example, membership in the National Athletic Trainers' Association (NATA) is 48% female, yet at the collegiate level only one-third of ATs are women (Kahanov, Loebsack, Masucci, and Roberts, 2010, p. 459). To understand the reasons behind this discrepancy, the authors of a recent study performed a large survey of female ATs working in and outside of academia (Kahanov, Loebsack, Masucci, and Roberts, 2010). The working hypothesis was that family obligations contribute to a gender bias in academia for athletic trainers.
Survey Methods
Of the 1,000 surveys sent out to working female ATs, only 405 responses were usable for the purposes of the study (Kahanov, Loebsack, Masucci, and Roberts, 2010, p. 460). Of these, 67.3% worked in an academic setting and 40% were parents of children under 16 years of age. The mean age of respondents was 33.7 years.
Impact of Parenthood on AT Careers
A more objective measure of the impact of parenthood on an AT career is whether the birth of children caused changes in employment. When respondents were queried on this topic, 42% and 65% reported changing job settings or working hours, respectively, after their children were born (Kahanov, Loebsack, Masucci, and Roberts, 2010, p. 461). Becoming a parent therefore has a significant impact on AT careers for women.
The survey also included a second phase involving essay questions designed to elicit more nuanced answers (Kahanov, Loebsack, Masucci, and Roberts, 2010, p. 461). The main themes revealed by these essay questions were that balancing career and family obligations was frequently difficult, as was navigating perceived gender inequalities.
Career Satisfaction and Family Planning
In terms of career satisfaction, 41% of respondents were happy being both a parent and an AT, while 50% wished they could spend more time at home. Only 13% expressed a desire to become a full-time parent, suggesting that the demands placed on parent-ATs are not sufficient to drive women out of their careers entirely.
Among non-parent respondents, 69% expressed a desire to have children someday, and the primary reason for delaying parenthood was financial stability. Notably, non-parent respondents were almost evenly divided on whether becoming a parent would affect their careers, suggesting that some respondents may be somewhat naive about the demands parenthood would place on their professional obligations.
References
Kahanov, Leamor, Loebsack, Alice R., Masucci, Matthew A., and Roberts, Jeff. (2010). Perspectives on parenthood and working of female athletic trainers in the secondary school and collegiate settings. Journal of Athletic Training, 45, 459–466.
O'Laughlin, Elizabeth and Bischoff, Lisa G. (2005). Balancing parenthood and academia: Work/family stress as influenced by gender and tenure status. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 79–106.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.