Gender Power and Female Sexuality in Susan Minot's "Lust"
This essay analyzes Susan Minot's short story "Lust" through the lens of gender and power dynamics in mid-twentieth-century America. The paper traces the historical oppression of women in the United States from the colonial era through the post–World War II period of domestic indoctrination, using that context to illuminate the experiences of Minot's unnamed narrator. Drawing on close reading of specific passages, the essay argues that the narrator's repeated sexual encounters reflect not liberated desire but the compulsive pressures of a patriarchal society that simultaneously demands female submission and punishes female sexuality. The paper concludes by connecting the story's themes to broader ongoing questions about gender equality.
- Introduction: Romance, Gender, and Minot's 'Lust': Story introduced as study of female sexual experience
- Historical Oppression of Women in the United States: Colonial-era legal and social marginalization of women
- The Post–World War II Cult of Domesticity and Silence: Postwar domesticity suppressed female desire and ambition
- The Narrator as a Product of Patriarchal Society: Narrator's encounters reflect patriarchal aggression and control
- Power, Submission, and the Male Gaze: Men exploit narrator while expecting traditional femininity
- Female Ambition Against Societal Expectation: Sexual pressure eclipses narrator's personal talents and goals
- Emotional Asymmetry and the Persistence of Gender Inequality: Men and women experience the same acts very differently
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The essay grounds its literary analysis in a concrete historical framework, connecting Minot's fictional narrator to documented social conditions faced by American women from the colonial era through the 1960s and 1970s.
- Close reading is used effectively: specific quoted passages from the story are analyzed at the sentence level, revealing how word choice (such as "shush") carries ideological weight beyond its surface meaning.
- The argument builds logically from historical context to textual evidence to thematic conclusion, giving the essay a clear through-line.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates contextualized close reading — a technique in which brief quotations from a primary text are embedded within a broader social or historical argument. Rather than summarizing the story's plot, the writer uses individual lines of dialogue and narration to show how the text encodes larger cultural dynamics. This is a foundational skill in literary analysis at the undergraduate level.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens with a framing introduction situating the story in its historical moment, then moves through several body sections that alternate between historical background and textual evidence. Each body section focuses on a distinct dimension of the central argument — domestic indoctrination, patriarchal aggression, the tension between ambition and sexuality, and emotional asymmetry between men and women — before a brief conclusion connects the story's themes to contemporary gender equality.
Introduction: Romance, Gender, and Minot's 'Lust'
Many authors have tried to capture, in print, the complex dynamics between men and women. This can be a very difficult process, as it can be nearly impossible to put into words exactly what happens when two people enter into a relationship. Fictional stories have explored all the various stages of romance and love that can affect two people — some discuss marriage, others divorce, and some the beginning of a romance. In Susan Minot's short story "Lust," a young female protagonist lists her past liaisons with young men and recounts what she did with each of them. The story is set in the 1960s or 1970s, a period in American history when women were breaking free from more than two hundred years of oppression by male-dominated society. During this period, women as a gender were slowly moving away from societal gender stereotypes and exploring their own sexualities. The narrator of Minot's story serves as a representative of the women of her time.
Historical Oppression of Women in the United States
Women in the United States have been considered marginalized, second-class citizens since before the time of the Founding Fathers. While the nation was still a colony of Great Britain, the social order of what would become America was firmly established. Men — only white men at that time — were in control. Only they could vote. In most cases, only they could own property. When a woman married, anything she had acquired in her lifetime, whether through her own endeavors or through inheritance, would come under the jurisdiction of her far more powerful husband.
Following that era came fluctuations between periods of limited freedoms and more stringent oppressions, with gender as the sole basis for women's marginalization. In the late 1940s and throughout the 1950s, in the aftermath of the Second World War, women were pushed into roles of complete submission. This was the era of the homemaker, wherein women were trained to be wives and mothers and could aspire to little more in their lives.
The Post–World War II Cult of Domesticity and Silence
Coinciding with this domestication of women was a cult of silence and oppression. There were things that were acceptable to discuss and things which were absolutely not — whether in public or even within the home. Among the forbidden topics were a woman's dissatisfaction with her place in the world and any feelings of sexuality she might have had. During this time, sex was understood as either a means of procreation or a wifely duty to satisfy the husband. Women were not supposed to engage in sexual activity for their own satisfaction. If they did, they became the kind of woman that polite society also refused to acknowledge. It would be a logical psychological consequence that such a repressive era would eventually give way to a completely free and sexually experimental period in its wake.
Works Cited
Minot, Susan. "Lust." Lust and Other Stories. Boston: Houghton Mifflin / S. Lawrence, 1989. Print.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.