This paper provides a summary and analysis of a biology article on genetic engineering, focusing on a 2012 Telegraph piece in which an Oxford professor argues that genetically engineering "ethical" babies may be a moral obligation. The paper defines genetic engineering and recombinant DNA technology, summarizes the article's main claims about personality genes and embryo screening, and explains how the topic connects to a biology course through concepts such as synthetic biology and DNA technology. It also discusses the real-world relevance of genetic modification for disease treatment, behavioral science, and human development, and concludes with an argument for taxpayer funding of genetic engineering research.
Genetic engineering is one of the major discoveries of the 20th century and an important topic in biology because of its broad implications for understanding life and development. Also referred to as genetic modification, this field provides humanity with the ability to tackle hunger, combat disease, and even influence human behavior. The importance of this issue to the biological field stems from its far-reaching implications, which have generated controversial philosophical and moral debates.
Generally, genetic engineering or genetic modification can be defined as the use of various techniques to modify or manipulate organisms through reproduction and heredity procedures. This field is also described as gene cloning or recombinant DNA technology, through which DNA molecules from different sources are combined in vitro or in cells and introduced into host organisms that are able to propagate them ("Genetic Engineering," n.d.).
The Daily Telegraph published an article regarding the morality of genetically engineering babies, based on the views of an Oxford professor (Alleyne, 2012). The article states that the creation of commonly known designer babies could be regarded as a moral obligation, since it promotes the development of these babies into ethically better children. The consideration of such practice as a moral obligation is informed by reports from experts in practical ethics. In this view, parents should be given the choice of evaluating personality traits in their children, since children with improved traits would be less likely to hurt themselves or others. The need for genetically engineering ethical babies is proposed because society is in the midst of a genetic revolution, even though screening is largely illegal except in certain medical conditions.
As part of embracing this process, the author notes that science is increasingly recognizing that genes have a significant impact on personality, to the extent that certain genetic markers in an embryo may suggest future characteristics. As a result, screening in or screening out particular genes in embryos enhances the possibility of influencing the outcome of a child's development. This, in turn, could help produce a more intelligent and less violent society through rational design. Therefore, the article argues that parents should be allowed to choose genetic engineering for ethical reasons, since the process is aimed at developing traits that benefit both the individual and society. The article concludes that genetics should be embraced rather than feared, because the future of humanity rests in the hands of the current population (Alleyne, 2012).
This article addresses an important issue in the biological field in relation to life development and the management of disease, hunger, and human behavior — three areas that have become central concerns in the modern world and key tools for natural scientists. The article relates to a biology course because it highlights the need to embrace genetics as a solution to major challenges affecting current and future human populations.
Some of the major course concepts that relate to the article include synthetic biology, DNA technology, and embryo transfer. The course supports understanding of the article in several ways. First, it provides an understanding of the new direction taken by synthetic biology away from the conventional focus on gene sequencing ("Extreme Genetic Engineering," 2007). Through this, students can identify and understand the role of naturally occurring genes. Second, the course provides foundational information about traditional biotechnology, the risks associated with synthetic biology, and the principles of genetic engineering more broadly.
"Links genetic engineering to disease, behavior, and daily life"
"Argues for public funding of genetic research"
You’re 58% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.