This paper provides a broad overview of cloning and human engineering, tracing the subject from naturally occurring cloning in biology to the cutting edge of stem cell research and tissue engineering. It examines the controversy surrounding human cloning, including the ethical, moral, and religious objections raised by critics, as well as the significant medical benefits proponents highlight. Key topics include the potential for "designer babies," the commodification of human life, threats to traditional family structures, and the risk of commercial exploitation. The paper draws on scientific literature, bioethics reports, and commentary from figures such as Jeremy Rifkin and Leon Kass to present a balanced analysis of the debate.
The paper demonstrates the technique of presenting a balanced argument by systematically alternating between opposing viewpoints. Rather than advocating a single position, it introduces a claim (e.g., the medical promise of stem cells) and immediately follows it with a counter-claim (e.g., the risk of designer babies and commercial abuse), modeling the kind of structured, evidence-supported argumentation expected in academic writing.
The paper opens with a framing introduction that establishes the breadth of the controversy. It then moves into a background section covering natural and scientific cloning before drilling down into stem cell research as a focused case study. The central section marshals arguments both for and against human cloning, drawing on medical, ethical, religious, and economic dimensions. A brief conclusion synthesizes the key tensions without resolving them, reflecting the genuinely unsettled nature of the debate.
The controversy about cloning and human engineering has resulted in heated debate across a broad spectrum of disciplines and perspectives. While cloning is essentially a scientific and medical discovery, its implications as a means of human engineering carry wide ramifications for society as a whole. The subject has also significantly affected philosophy, religion, and politics. This paper provides an overview of cloning and human engineering and discusses the various arguments for and against cloning in both practice and theory.
The main reason for the controversy surrounding cloning is that it challenges many of the moral, ethical, and religious norms prevalent in society. Numerous religious and human rights authorities, for example, were shocked by the assertions of the Italian doctor Severino Antinori, who announced that he was in the process of cloning a human baby (Profile: Dr. Severino Antinori). There have also been claims of ongoing experiments to replicate human beings; the American religious sect "Clone Aid," for instance, reportedly expects a "'new creation' to arrive through cloning technology" (Bedford-Strohm, 2002). Such reports suggest that cloning technology may already be widely available and not necessarily supervised by medical authorities.
Cloning has also introduced the possibility of engineering body parts from cells, with stem cell cloning emerging as one of the most exciting and controversial areas of contemporary genetic research. Yet cloning itself has a long history, and various forms have been observed and used by scientists and biologists for many years. In fact, cloning occurs extensively in nature: "Clones frequently occur naturally. Potato plants reproduce vegetatively by growing tubers from which the new plant will grow. Potatoes are clones" (Biology, 2005). Cloning activity has also been observed in bacterial colonies, where scientists have documented the replication of genetically identical organisms. The critical difference today is that the knowledge and technology enabling human cloning have become available, and it is the ramifications of this development that lie at the heart of current concern.
Stem cell research is one of the most contentious areas of modern human engineering. It is contentious because, on the one hand, it offers remarkable medical and therapeutic opportunities, while on the other it raises profound ethical and moral issues. Stem cells are "undifferentiated cells that give rise to the many specialized tissues within the human body. Adult stem cells are found in particular parts of the body, some capable of developing into several kinds of specialized cells" (Darnovsky, 2002). Embryonic stem cells, found in embryos, have the ability to develop into other cell types — such as heart or muscle cells — opening an entirely new world of possibilities for medical science. One of the principal advantages of this technology is that organs grown from a patient's own stem cells greatly reduce the risk of immune rejection: "Embryo cloning has been proposed as a way to solve the immune rejection problem" (Darnovsky, 2002).
While this technology has the potential to replace diseased or injured body parts, it has also opened a range of deeply troubling possibilities. Among the most disconcerting is the potential creation of "designer babies" — children engineered to predetermined specifications. "Embryo cloning is the technology that would make the creation of eugenically engineered 'designer babies' commercially feasible" (Darnovsky, 2002). This has prompted growing concern among medical and other experts that cloning technology may be abused for immoral and socially destructive purposes. As Darnovsky (2002) notes, "Many disability rights activists argue that it is being used in a misguided search for 'perfect' babies, and many feminists voice concern about its use to satisfy 'gender preference.'"
Despite these concerns, the benefits arising from stem cell research cannot easily be dismissed. There is real evidence that genetic engineering may lead to breakthroughs in treating presently incurable conditions such as Parkinson's disease, as well as diabetes, blindness, heart attacks, and stroke. For example, a team at the University of Melbourne's Centre for Eye Research Australia, working alongside researchers from the Bernard O'Brien Institute of Microsurgery (BOBIM), successfully replicated a cornea using a single stem cell from a donor. The technique also holds promise for patients who have suffered alkaline burns damaging the surface of their eyes (More Stem Cell Research Advances).
Numerous other fields of medical research have demonstrated the effective potential of stem cell technology. Researchers at the Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids) and Harvard Medical School have found that neural stem cell development during embryogenesis may directly affect abnormal brain development (More Stem Cell Research Advances). A related and equally promising field is tissue engineering. In an article entitled "Tissue Engineering," Nimia Barrera (2000) describes the possibility of creating and replacing tissues and organs:
"An exciting new strategy, however, is poised to revolutionize the treatment of patients who need new vital structures: the creation of man-made tissues or organs, known as neo-organs. In one scenario, a tissue engineer injects or places a given molecule, such as a growth factor, into a wound or an organ that requires regeneration. These molecules cause the patient's own cells to migrate into the wound site, turn into the right type of cell, and regenerate the tissue." (Barrera, 2000)
While cloning presents many new medical possibilities, it also faces substantial counter-arguments asserting that these advances will result in danger to society in both practical and moral and ethical senses. The most troubling question is whether, if cloning is accepted and normalized as a standard scientific and medical procedure, it will negatively affect fundamental societal structures such as the family. There is also the alarming possibility that cloning techniques may be abused for economic purposes, raising the specter of commercially produced human beings. These are critical issues that must be carefully considered when evaluating advances in medical science and human engineering.
Barrera, N. (2000). Tissue engineering. Retrieved April 27, 2007, from
Bedford-Strohm, H. (2002). Sacred body? Stem cell research and human cloning. Ecumenical Review. Retrieved April 27, 2007, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2065/is_3_54/ai_92136470/pg_4
Biology. (2005). Retrieved April 27, 2007, from
Biotech Century: Anti-Cloning Initiative. Retrieved April 27, 2007, from
Critique of Cloning Human Beings: Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Retrieved April 27, 2007, from
Darnovsky, M. (2002). Embryo cloning and beyond. Retrieved April 27, 2007, from
Deem, R. Arguments against Proposition 71: The California Stem Cell Research and Cures Initiative. Retrieved April 27, 2007, from
Kass, L. R. (1997). The wisdom of repugnance. Retrieved April 27, 2007, from
More stem cell research advances. Retrieved April 27, 2007, from
Pope rejects cloning. (2002). Retrieved April 27, 2007, from http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9506EFD9163FF93AA15751C1A9649C8B63
Profile: Dr. Severino Antinori. Retrieved April 27, 2007, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/1477698.stm
Statement in support of legislation to prohibit cloning. Retrieved April 27, 2007, from
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.