This paper examines Andrew Hargreaves' Fourth Way model as a framework for meaningful structural change in education. Drawing on Hargreaves' (2009a, 2009b) work, the paper outlines the six pillars of purpose and partnership — including an inspiring vision, public engagement, investment in achievement, corporate educational responsibility, student agency, and mindful teaching — and argues that these pillars offer a cohesive transformative vision. The paper also considers the limitations of the current education system, rooted in individualism and standardized testing, and critically evaluates both the strengths and drawbacks of the Fourth Way approach, including potential resistance from stakeholders and the idealistic tone of Hargreaves' language.
According to Hargreaves (2009b), "what has passed for the Third Way has been the emergence of a new kind of autocratic and all-seeing state that has used technological and data-driven self-surveillance along with some emotional effervescence in lateral professional interactions to deliver unchanging government goals" (p. 3). The Fourth Way, proposed by Hargreaves, sounds comparatively idealistic. The Fourth Way "brings together Government policy with professional involvement and public engagement around an inspiring social and educational mission" (Hargreaves, 2009b, p. 3). The Fourth Way is a type of ideological and cultural shift, demanding a lot more from the individual stakeholder than faith in government or the private sector. As such, the Fourth Way might be the only way to create meaningful structural changes in the field of education.
In "The Fourth Way of Change," Hargreaves (2009b) outlines five pillars of "purpose and partnership" that can initiate and sustain viable change effort. The five pillars include an inspiring and inclusive vision; public engagement; "no achievement without investment"; corporate educational responsibility; and students being partners in change. In The Fourth Way, Hargreaves (2009a) proposes an additional pillar of purpose and partnership: mindful learning and teaching (p. 73). These six pillars together form a cohesive and transformative vision for the future of education.
The benefits of school and community partnerships have yet to be fully realized practically, or fully researched. The fact that change is necessary has doubtlessly been proven by any measure; educational outcomes alone should signal the need for change. Bureaucracy and meaningless educational standards have created a generation of disillusioned students and educators. A Fourth Way vision encourages a new examination of the role that education plays in personal and collective development. The language used to describe the Fourth Way seems New Age, which is one of the drawbacks of the Hargreaves model.
"Critiques individualism as barrier to community growth"
"Weighs benefits and limitations of the Fourth Way"
You’re 44% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.