Hourly Nurse Rounding: Reducing Falls, Call Lights, and Pressure Ulcers
This literature review examines five peer-reviewed studies to determine whether hourly nurse rounding effectively reduces patient falls, call light use, and pressure ulcer incidence while improving patient satisfaction. Drawing on integrative reviews, quantitative pilot studies, and experimental designs, the paper synthesizes findings from Hicks (2015), Ford (2010), Hodgson (2012), Saleh et al. (2011), and Tucker et al. (2011). Results consistently demonstrate that structured hourly rounding reduces fall rates by 50–60%, decreases call light use by more than 50%, and lowers pressure ulcer incidence by up to 56%. The review also identifies a gap in the literature regarding pressure ulcer reduction specifically and calls for further evidence-based practice research in this area.
- Introduction and Background: Defines hourly rounding and its clinical rationale
- Hicks (2015): Hourly Rounding and Fall Reduction: Integrative review links rounding to fewer falls
- Ford (2010): Patient Satisfaction and Call Light Use: Pilot study shows call light and ulcer reductions
- Hodgson (2012), Saleh et al. (2011), and Tucker et al. (2011): Additional Evidence: Three studies confirm fall and pressure ulcer benefits
- Conclusion and Gaps in the Literature: Synthesis identifies pressure ulcer research gap
- Literature Review Summary Table: Cross-study comparison of designs and findings
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Synthesizes five peer-reviewed sources systematically, presenting each study's design, methodology, and findings in a consistent structure that makes comparison easy.
- Includes a well-organized summary table that maps each study to its design type, theoretical framework, setting, key variables, findings, and hierarchy of evidence level.
- Closes with a clearly stated gap in the literature — insufficient evidence on hourly rounding and pressure ulcer reduction — giving the review a forward-looking research purpose.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates integrative literature review methodology, drawing on both quantitative experimental studies and integrative reviews to build a converging evidence base. By comparing independent studies across different settings and patient populations, it shows how synthesis of existing research can reveal consistent patterns — and important absences — in nursing practice evidence.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a background paragraph framing the clinical problem, then devotes a section to each of the five reviewed studies, covering research design, key concepts, and findings in sequence. A conclusion synthesizes themes and names the evidence gap. The summary table at the end consolidates all five studies for quick cross-reference, reinforcing the analytical narrative in the body.
Introduction and Background
This literature review investigates whether hourly rounding can reduce pressure ulcers, patient falls, and call light use, and whether it contributes to an overall increase in patient satisfaction. The outcomes of the review help identify existing gaps in the literature on this topic.
Nursing practice has increasingly turned to structured interventions like hourly rounding as a proactive approach to patient safety. Falls are a critical problem within healthcare organizations and represent a leading cause of injury-related deaths among older adults. More than 20% of people who fall suffer moderate-to-severe injuries, such as head trauma, bruises, or hip fractures (Hicks, 2015, p. 51). In 2000, the costs of managing fall-related injuries exceeded $19 billion, a figure projected to surpass $54 billion by 2020. Hourly rounding — which involves checking patients at regular intervals to meet their needs proactively — has been identified as an effective strategy for reducing patient falls and improving overall safety.
Hicks (2015): Hourly Rounding and Fall Reduction
Hicks (2015), in "Can Rounding Reduce Patient Falls in Acute Care? An Integrative Literature Review," defines a fall as an unexpected descent from a sitting, standing, or supine position. The study uses an integrative review design, which summarizes the outcomes of multiple independent studies to determine the current knowledge guiding nursing practice. The author searched research articles published between 2009 and 2014 using key concepts including nursing hourly rounds, fall prevention, and hospital. Data analysis involved reading articles multiple times to identify similarities, differences, and patterns among the selected studies.
Hicks (2015) synthesized 14 articles and found that hourly rounding is an effective tool for reducing patient falls. Some of the reviewed articles showed that 50% of falls were recorded within four weeks of implementing hourly rounding. Furthermore, "falls decreased from 4.001 to 2.613 per 1,000 patient days" (Hicks, 2015, p. 52). These findings position hourly rounding as an autonomous nursing intervention that supports patient safety by addressing the circumstances that commonly lead to falls.
Ford (2010): Patient Satisfaction and Call Light Use
Ford (2010), in "Hourly Rounding: A Strategy to Improve Patient Satisfaction Scores," argues that patient satisfaction is critical for healthcare organizations and that an effective nurse-patient relationship can enhance safety, compassion, and service quality. Nursing services play an important role in quality of care, patient satisfaction, and safety. According to Ford (2010), hourly rounding is an effective method for enhancing quality of care through a proactive approach that achieves positive patient outcomes while improving patient satisfaction.
Ford's (2010) research design involved collecting feedback at the Baltimore Washington Medical Center (BWMC) to evaluate the effectiveness of hourly rounding over a three-week period. Approval was obtained from BWMC management before the evaluation began. "Quantitative call light data were collected during this time, along with data from rounding logs and discharge phone calls made to those patients within 48 hours of discharge" (Ford, 2010, p. 189).
The findings revealed that call light use declined by 52%, and patient falls decreased within the hospital during the study period. When nursing staff met patients' needs through regular hourly rounds and addressed their basic needs proactively, the risk of falls was reduced. Ford (2010) also found that when nursing staff integrated repositioning and turning into their care routines, pressure ulcer rates decreased by 56%. Additionally, patient satisfaction increased as a result of the improved quality of care, and nursing care itself became less stressful and more efficient when hourly rounding was implemented, ultimately contributing to nursing satisfaction as well.
Hodgson (2012), Saleh et al. (2011), and Tucker et al. (2011): Additional Evidence
Hodgson (2012) conducted an integrative literature review to examine the benefits of hourly rounding, using a comprehensive search of CINAHL, Medline, and Google. Search terms included "hourly rounds," "patient safety," "intentional rounding," "pressure ulcers," and "falls." Hodgson (2012) also examined how rounding logs were performed at Leeds Teaching Hospital, with an assessment carried out over two weeks to evaluate hourly rounding effectiveness. The implementation strategy relied on informal verbal training and email distribution of training documentation to nursing staff. Rounding logs were completed for 44 of 51 patients. Results showed that no patient falls were recorded during the trial period, and there were no patient complaints during the two-week assessment.
Saleh, Nusair, Zubadi, et al. (2011) define the Nursing Round System (NRS) as a strategy of checking patients on an hourly or two-hourly basis to assess pain control, observe general health conditions, and meet non-medical needs. The authors evaluated the effectiveness of hourly rounding at a private hospital using 26 beds and 104 patients over a two-month period. The study instrument included a patient call light survey and patient demographic data. Nurses collected data in stroke units for four weeks, capturing information on patient satisfaction and demographic characteristics. The results revealed that call light use was significantly reduced, and pressure ulcers decreased by 50%.
Tucker, Bieber, Attlesey-Pries, et al. (2011) further support the argument that patient falls can be reduced through hourly rounding. Their study used descriptive statistics with a sample drawn from two 29-bed postoperative orthopedic units in a large academic medical center in the Midwest United States. Key variables included fall risk scores, fall rates, and SNRI (structured nursing rounds intervention) fidelity. The results revealed that fall rates were reduced by 60%, providing strong quantitative evidence for the effectiveness of structured hourly rounding in high-risk patient populations.
References
Ford, M.B. (2010). Hourly rounding: A strategy to improve patient satisfaction scores. MEDSURG Nursing, 19(3), 188–191.
Hicks, D. (2015). Can rounding reduce patient falls in acute care? An integrative literature review. MEDSURG Nursing, 24(1), 51–55.
Hodgson, G.L.L. (2012). Hourly rounding in a high dependency unit. Nursing Standard / RCN, 27(8), 35–40.
Saleh, B.S., Nusair, H., Zubadi, N.A., et al. (2011). The nursing rounds system: Effect on patient's call light use, bed sores, falls, and satisfaction level. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 17, 299–303.
Tucker, S.J., Bieber, P.L., Attlesey-Pries, J.M., et al. (2011). Outcomes and challenges in implementing hourly rounds to reduce falls in orthopedic units. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 18–29.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.