Hurricane Sandy Emergency Communication Failures on Jersey Shore
This paper examines the emergency preparedness and crisis communication failures surrounding Hurricane Sandy, with a focus on affected residents of the Jersey Shore. Drawing on the experience of a homeowner who successfully prepared for the storm but was left uninformed during and after the evacuation, the paper highlights critical gaps in public communication channels, official responsiveness, and intergovernmental coordination. It references findings from The Heritage Foundation and local reporting to argue that future disaster response must incorporate multiple modes of information dissemination, clearer lines of bilateral communication, and community-level outreach systems such as "block captains" to better serve residents during natural disasters.
- Introduction: Sandy's Arrival and Public Preparation: Homeowner's successful pre-storm preparation described
- Media Coverage Before the Storm: Media provided strong advance warning to residents
- Failures in Communication During and After Evacuation: Information gaps left evacuees without guidance
- Government Responsiveness and Structural Problems: FEMA and state officials blamed for buck-passing
- Recommendations for Future Emergency Preparedness: Block captains and bilateral communication channels proposed
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its argument in a concrete personal account, using a named homeowner's experience to illustrate systemic failures in a relatable and credible way.
- It balances anecdotal evidence with cited secondary sources, including a Heritage Foundation report and local journalism, lending analytical depth to what could otherwise read as a complaint narrative.
- The paper moves logically from what went right (pre-storm preparation) to what went wrong (during and after), maintaining a clear cause-and-effect structure throughout.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses a case study approach at the individual level — a single resident's experience — to draw broader policy conclusions. By layering direct quotation, secondary source citation, and prescriptive recommendations, the writer demonstrates how micro-level evidence can be used to critique macro-level emergency management systems.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with context-setting on Sandy and introduces the homeowner's experience. It then evaluates pre-storm media coverage positively before pivoting to criticize communication failures during and after evacuation. A dedicated section addresses governmental and interagency failures, drawing on Bucci et al. The paper closes with actionable policy recommendations, including bilateral communication channels and community-level block captain systems. A reference list follows in APA format.
Introduction: Sandy's Arrival and Public Preparation
Unlike earthquakes, hurricanes offer a small window for immediate, acute emergency preparedness that can help members of the public at least get their families to safety. Hurricane Sandy was no different. While the media did provide ample warnings that the hurricane was coming and that preparation was necessary, the during and after stages of the event were not handled as well as they could have been in many communities on the Jersey Shore.
Frank Timmerman, a homeowner, describes several issues related more to responsiveness than to preparation. "We had filled up the tank with gas and were ready to evacuate as soon as we were ordered to do so, we had ample water and tinned food supplies, and we had flashlights, batteries, candles, and all that other stuff. We also took as many precautions as we could to secure our house and make sure to minimize property damage. Thankfully we had more than a day to research online what we needed to do. This was our first hurricane," Timmerman said.
Media Coverage Before the Storm
The media was covering the oncoming storm extensively, said Timmerman, providing up-to-date information about the storm's location and direction of movement. Moreover, the media offered guidance about how to prepare for the storm and which communities would need to evacuate. It turned out that Timmerman's community was in fact ordered to evacuate. When the announcement arrived, Timmerman was prepared and knew which shelter to drive to — but that was all he knew.
It was at this point that Timmerman recognized how poor the broader media response had been, as there were no official lines of communication established for residents once they were displaced.
Failures in Communication During and After Evacuation
As Goldberg (2012) points out, Sandy demonstrated how many communities like these need multiple methods of information dissemination, including a dedicated email address, a dedicated telephone link that operates like a "reverse 911 system," a website, or a Twitter feed. Additionally, Timmerman would have wanted a "block captain" in his community: someone who could go door to door informing people of the details of their evacuation, as well as providing information about how to stay in touch regarding updates on when they might be able to return (Goldberg, 2012). As it was, there was nothing. Timmerman and his neighbors were literally and figuratively in the dark about what to do.
References
Bucci, S. P., et al. (n.d.). After Hurricane Sandy. Retrieved from http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/10/after-hurricane-sandy-time-to-learn-and-implement-the-lessons
Goldberg, D. (2012). Hurricane Sandy response. Retrieved from http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2012/11/sandy_proves_importance_of_com.html
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.