Internet Sex Addiction: Are Researchers Too Negative?
This paper critically examines the dominant negative framing in Internet sexuality research, drawing on Döring's (2009) comprehensive review to argue that scholars have largely overlooked the potential positive outcomes of Online Sexual Activities (OSAs). The paper identifies a significant gap in the empirical literature: while risks such as sexual addiction, infidelity, and compulsive behavior are well documented, constructive uses of Internet sexuality — including enhanced sexual communication and relationship satisfaction — have been almost entirely neglected. In response, the paper proposes a study using an anonymous online questionnaire to investigate associations between OSA participation and real-life relational outcomes, including relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and Internet sex addiction screening scores.
- Introduction: The Negative Bias in Internet Sexuality Research: Research on internet sexuality has emphasized risks and harms
- Positive Potential of Internet Sexuality: A Gap in the Literature: Döring identifies missing empirical work on positive OSA outcomes
- Proposed Study Design and Methodology: Anonymous online survey measuring OSA frequency and relationship outcomes
- Predicted Outcomes and Hypotheses: OSAs with partners predicted to improve sexual and relational satisfaction
- Conclusion: Rethinking Internet Sexuality: Internet sexuality may expand sexual repertoire without causing harm
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper anchors its argument in a credible, peer-reviewed literature review (Döring, 2009), using it both as evidence of the research gap and as a springboard for the proposed study.
- The introduction clearly establishes the problem — a systematic negative bias in Internet sexuality research — before building toward a constructive, hypothesis-driven response.
- The proposed study design is practically grounded, referencing established instruments (Delmonico & Miller, 2003) and realistic recruitment methods, which strengthens academic credibility.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of literature gap identification as a rhetorical and methodological strategy. Rather than simply critiquing prior research, the author converts the identified gap — the near-total absence of empirical studies on positive OSA outcomes — into a direct justification for the proposed study. This technique, common in graduate-level research proposals, shows how a critical literature review can generate original research questions.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a classic research proposal structure: it opens with a critical survey of the existing literature, identifies a specific and consequential gap, describes a proposed study to fill that gap (including sampling, instrumentation, and data collection), states directional hypotheses, and closes with a broader significance statement. This makes it a strong model for undergraduate or early graduate research proposal writing.
Introduction: The Negative Bias in Internet Sexuality Research
Research on Internet sexuality has focused predominantly on the use and misuse of online pornography, followed by online sex-seeking behaviors, and the Internet as a source of sexual health information. Within these domains, especially the first two, researchers have often framed their approach as one of elucidating the inherent risks associated with Internet sexuality. In her 2009 review of two decades of research on Internet sexuality, Döring noted that "virtually no publications describe this type of behavior as largely ordinary or harmless" (p. 1097).
Study after study recites the often presumed — and sometimes substantiated — risks of Internet sexuality, including sexual addiction and compulsive behavior, infidelity, unwanted or unsolicited contact in the form of sexual harassment, abuse or coercion, reduced work productivity, financial burdens, the presumed risk of spreading STIs and diseases, and the potential for an increase in unwanted pregnancies. Very few studies have created avenues for understanding the potential positive consequences of Internet sexuality, and where the literature does make reference to such possibilities it is often supported anecdotally or simply presumed. Döring notes that while there is a definite possibility for positive consequences, the majority of research on Internet sexuality to date has ignored this avenue and focused on the negative.
Positive Potential of Internet Sexuality: A Gap in the Literature
Döring suggests that if "used competently, the Internet [can provide] users with an opportunity to satisfy their sexual needs in constructive ways," and lists the potential for improvement of sexual communication within a relationship as one example of such constructive uses of Internet sexuality. Despite Döring's ability to conceive of this possibility, her thorough review of the literature fails to find any empirical studies directly testing the impact of Internet sexuality on positive relational outcomes.
The studies that do mention positive aspects of Internet sexuality do so mostly through conjecture, assuming that Internet sexuality can provide participants with new sexual experiences in a relatively safe setting — experiences that can lead to sexual knowledge, sexual empowerment, and sexual freedom. Döring continues: "cybersex should not be classified as a deficient substitute for 'real sex,' but should instead be understood as a specific form of sexual expression that can play a legitimate role in the sexual and relational life of its participants" (p. 1096).
Despite this potential for Internet sexuality, and cybersex specifically, to play a "legitimate role in the sexual and relational" lives of its participants, no studies to date have been designed in such a way as to examine the potential for such outcomes. By examining the varying contexts and frequencies with which individuals participate in Online Sexual Activities (OSAs), the proposed study seeks to examine the associations between Internet sexuality and real-life sexual and relational outcomes. As such, the study seeks to fill the literature gap identified by Döring, in which there has been a "marked deficit of qualitative studies concerned with … [how] such activities fit into an individual's sexual biography and impact relationships between sexual partners and peers" (p. 1099).
Proposed Study Design and Methodology
Participants will be invited to complete a brief online questionnaire detailing their participation in OSAs, as well as their demographic information and the nature of their current relationships — including relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and participation in extra-dyadic sexual relations (i.e., infidelity). In addition, participants will complete a screening questionnaire to determine whether they meet a clinical cut-off point to be considered addicted to Internet sexuality or OSAs (Delmonico & Miller, 2003). The surveys will be delivered using a free online survey platform, and the sample will be drawn from students on campus through postings on social networking sites such as Facebook and flyers posted around campus.
Due to the online nature of the survey, all data collected will be completely anonymous, thereby addressing concerns related to confidentiality when investigating a personal subject such as sex and the Internet.
Conclusion: Rethinking Internet Sexuality
It is hoped that this study will fill a gap in the literature on Internet sexuality that has failed to conceive of the possibility for positive outcomes as a result of Online Sexual Activities. It is quite plausible that using the Internet for sexual communication and activity may serve as simply a new form of sexuality — a method of augmenting and expanding one's sexual repertoire and experience — thereby breaking through the existing notion that Internet sexuality is nearly always linked to sexual addiction and sexual compulsion, wreaking havoc on the real-life relationships of its participants.
References
Cooper, A., Morahan-Martin, J., Mathy, R. M., & Maheu, M. (2002). Toward an increased understanding of user demographics in online sexual activities. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 28, 105–120.
Cooper, A., Mansson, S., Daneback, K., Tikkanen, R., & Ross, M. W. (2003). Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 18(3), 277–291.
Delmonico, D. L., & Miller, J. A. (2003). The Internet Sex Screening Test: A comparison of sexual compulsives vs. non-sexual compulsives. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 18(3), 261–276.
Döring, N. M. (2009). The Internet's impact on sexuality: A critical review of 15 years of research. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 1089–1101.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.