Social Media Use by Minors: Benefits, Risks, and Sexting

Introduction to Social Media Use Among Youth

Defining Sexting

To date, not one state in the country has legally defined sexting. The closest that many states have come to prohibiting it are legislations against the sharing of nude or semi-nude photos of minors via cellphones. The word "sexting" is a combination of the words sex and texting. It is generally interpreted to mean the sharing of sex-related material intended to sexually arouse the recipient. The majority of studies conducted on sexting have focused on the prevalence of the trend among youths. Because these studies used varied sampling methods and differing definitions of what constitutes sexting, the results show broad variation in findings (Martinez-Prather & Vandiver, 2014).

CosmoGirl.com and the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy conducted one of the pioneer studies on sexting in 2008. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of sexting behaviors among teenagers and youths. The researchers defined sexting as the act of posting or sharing nude or semi-nude images and/or videos. The use of such a broad definition carries serious research implications—most notably, it can result in the distortion of facts or the exaggeration of findings. For example, one of the main concerns that researchers and policymakers have about sexting is its prevalence among minors and whether it constitutes child pornography. Many people assume sexting among minors is widespread; however, Mitchell et al. (2012) argue that sexting among minors is actually rare and that the sharing of images cannot be legally defined as child pornography in the way that media reports and several current studies suggest.

There is a need to determine more precisely what constitutes sexting. Simply defining it based on content that meets definitions of child pornography does not fully capture the impact of the trend when minors share content that does not rise to that legal standard. For instance, consider the case of fourteen-year-old Angie Verona, who posted provocative photos of herself in lingerie and a bathing suit, only to have her Photobucket account hacked and the images shared on various pornographic websites (Martinez-Prather & Vandiver, 2014). Although the photos were not pornographic, their appearance on those sites resulted in serious emotional and psychological trauma for the victim. Developing a definition of sexting that captures all contexts likely to produce negative consequences for victims would help researchers better understand this risky behavior and develop more effective prevention strategies.

Social Media Use by Minors, Teens, and Youths

Routine use of social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, Snapchat, and Instagram has been found to improve technical, communication, and social skills among minors and teenagers. Sites such as Facebook and Snapchat offer youths and teens daily opportunities to connect with classmates, friends, and others who share common interests. In recent years, the number of minors and teenagers using social media has increased significantly. A recent study found that approximately twenty-two percent of teenagers log into at least one social media site no fewer than ten times a day, and more than fifty percent log in at least once per day. This growth in social media use has been attributed in part to the rising number of teenagers who own smartphones—at least seventy-five percent (Hinduja & Patchin, 2007). It can therefore be argued that the majority of youths today are growing up both socially and emotionally on the internet.

However, despite the many benefits that minors and youths gain from routine social media use, they also face significant risks when expressing themselves or sharing content online. Contributing factors include low self-regulation capacity and peer pressure. Several studies have shown that, alongside positive behaviors, many offline negative behaviors—such as sexual experimentation, clique-forming, and bullying—have migrated online in forms such as sexting and cyberbullying. Additional negative behaviors associated with overuse of social media platforms include sleep deprivation and internet addiction (Christakis & Moreno, 2009).

The responsibility for protecting children from negative influences falls primarily on parents. Although many parents have improved their understanding and use of technology, they still struggle to engage with their teens' online lives. For instance, many parents do not understand the new modes of socialization enabled by platforms like Facebook and Snapchat, despite these platforms being central to adolescents' social worlds. Many parents also lack the time or technical knowledge to keep up with a constantly evolving social media landscape (O'Keefe, Clarke-Pearson & Council on Communications and Media, 2011). When parents cannot keep pace with their children's technological world, the result is a disconnect that prevents them from effectively monitoring or shielding their children from the harmful effects of online life.

Benefits of Social Media for Children and Adolescents

Socialization and Communication

There are many benefits for children, teenagers, and youths who use social media regularly. Young people can not only keep up with the latest news but also make new friends, stay connected, and share content with others. Social media platforms also offer deeper benefits (O'Keefe et al., 2011), including:

• Providing platforms for interaction with other community members through volunteering or raising money for community initiatives
• Enhancing creativity through the sharing of creative works and content
• Providing a platform for the development of entrepreneurial ideas
• Expanding one's social networks by connecting with others who share similar interests
• Broadening one's worldview through exposure to different cultures, perspectives, issues, and world affairs
• Enhancing personal identity and social skills

Enhanced Learning Opportunities

Students in high schools across the country and abroad have formed groups to learn and share ideas on projects and assignments. Some schools have also developed blogs to share supplementary content with their students. Learning through social media platforms and blogs has been reported by students to be more engaging, which in turn increases retention of learned content (O'Keefe et al., 2011).

Accessing Health Information

Teens around the world are increasingly finding it convenient to access health information online. Many authoritative health sites allow adolescents to find information on depression, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and stress reduction. Youths with various health conditions can also join social media groups to share ideas on coping strategies. Such online support networks have been reported to reduce missed appointments, improve understanding of diseases, and enhance medication adherence (Krishna, Boren & Balas, 2009). Teenagers can also receive advice from medical professionals via social media networks. Despite these positive aspects, teenagers are also vulnerable to and exposed to incorrect health information online. For this reason, parents need to closely monitor their children's online activities and caution them about the possibility of encountering harmful misinformation.

Risks of Social Media Use by Youth

Social media platforms pose greater risks to minors and youths than many parents realize. The majority of risks that young people face online can be classified under the following categories: privacy concerns; exposure to inappropriate images, texts, or videos; harassment; and negative influence from advertisers or radical groups.

Cyberbullying and Online Harassment

Cyberbullying can be defined as the intentional use of any form of digital media to send hostile, embarrassing, or false information about another individual. Many researchers consider it the most common risk faced by teenagers in the online world.

Although "online harassment" is often used interchangeably with cyberbullying, the two terms do not carry the same meaning. According to Hinduja and Patchin (2007), online harassment occurs less frequently than physical harassment. The two researchers also argue that logging onto social media sites does expose teenagers to online harassment, but that cyberbullying is far more common and can occur any time a teenager accesses a social media site. Various studies have documented how teenagers suffer psychosocial effects from cyberbullying, including isolation, anxiety, depression, and in extreme cases, suicide.

Sexting

As defined earlier, sexting refers to the sharing of sexually explicit content via digital devices. Many images and texts shared through smartphones, tablets, and similar devices can later be redistributed online, resulting in serious emotional and psychological harm to the victim. According to a recent study, approximately twenty percent of teenagers in the U.S. have shared a nude or semi-nude image or video of themselves. While some teenagers caught sexting have been charged with engaging in child pornography, many states treat sexting simply as a misdemeanor (Jaishanker, 2009; O'Keefe et al., 2011). Others have been suspended from school. In the majority of cases, however, sexting occurs between peers and does not cause distress—particularly when it involves older youths.

Facebook Depression

According to Selfhout et al. (2009), the term "Facebook depression" refers to depression that develops among adolescents and preteens who spend considerable time on social media platforms such as Facebook, and who subsequently exhibit the classical signs and symptoms of depression. Peer acceptance is often a critical component of any young person's social life. Those who feel they are not accepted—or who do not receive enough messages or friend requests—can experience feelings of depression. As with clinical depression, those suffering from Facebook depression often withdraw socially, which in turn can push them toward self-destructive behaviors such as drug use or risky sexual activity.

Privacy Concerns and Digital Footprint

Many youths and adults have been found to share too much personal information online, use technology improperly, or post false information about themselves or others. According to O'Keefe et al. (2011), such behaviors put the privacy of affected individuals at risk. This information may be acquired by unscrupulous individuals and used to commit fraud or steal someone's identity.

When a teenager—or even an adult—visits a website, he or she leaves behind data about themselves. The cumulative, ongoing capture of a person's web activity is referred to as a digital footprint. One's digital footprint can reveal a great deal about them. When a website or company collects a young person's digital footprint, that person's future reputation could be damaged if the data is later exposed or misused. Many young people post inappropriate images, texts, or videos without recognizing that "what goes online stays online." With just a few clicks, a teenager or preteen can unknowingly jeopardize their future university or job prospects.

Influence of Advertisements on Buying Behavior

After spending just a few minutes on Facebook, a user is exposed to dozens of advertisements. Some of these are based on digital footprint data (behavioral ads), others are banner ads, and still others are targeted by demographic relevance. Studies have revealed that, beyond influencing purchasing decisions, these ads also shape the opinions of young people on various issues (O'Keefe et al., 2011). Several online platforms have recognized the impact of behavioral advertising on teens and preteens and now prohibit such advertisements. It is important for parents, teachers, and guardians to be aware of the powerful effect of such advertising and to take appropriate precautions before allowing children to access the internet on phones, computers, or tablets.

Conclusion and References

This review has shown that while social media platforms offer meaningful benefits to young people—including enhanced socialization, learning opportunities, and access to health information—the risks they face online are substantial and multifaceted. Cyberbullying, sexting, Facebook depression, privacy violations, and manipulative advertising all pose genuine threats to the well-being of minors and adolescents. The legal landscape surrounding sexting remains inconsistent and underdeveloped, and the broader cultural debate about the sexualization of youth is hampered by methodological disagreements and a shortage of rigorous research. Effective responses require not only clearer definitions and more consistent legislation but also active parental monitoring, robust guardianship, and the meaningful involvement of professionals such as pediatricians. Young people's online lives are deeply intertwined with their offline development, and addressing the risks they encounter online demands coordinated effort from families, schools, healthcare providers, and policymakers alike.

References

Attwood, F. (2006). Sexed up: Theorizing the sexualization of culture. Sexualities, 9(1), 77–94.

Bailey, R. (2011). Letting children be children: Report of an independent review of the commercialisation and sexualisation of childhood. London: Department for Education.

Barnes, G., Hoffman, J., Welte, J., Farrell, M., & Dintcheff, B. (2007). Adolescents' time use: Effects on substance use, delinquency and sexual activity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(5), 697–710.

Christakis, D. A., & Moreno, M. A. (2009). Trapped in the net: Will internet addiction become a 21st-century epidemic? Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 163(10), 959–960.

Department of Media, Culture and Sport. (2010). Business plan 2011–2015. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121204113822/http://www.culture.gov.uk/images/publications/DCMS-Business-Plan_2010-15.pdf

Gill, R. (2012). Media, empowerment and the "sexualization of culture" debates. Sex Roles.

Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. (2007). Offline consequences of online victimization: School violence and delinquency. Journal of School Violence, 6(3), 89–112.

Hollis-Peel, M., Reynald, D., van Bavel, M., Elffers, H., & Welsh, B. (2011). Guardianship for crime prevention: A critical review of the literature. Crime, Law and Social Change, 56, 53–70.

Jaishanker, K. (2009). Sexting: A new form of victimless crime? International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 3(1), 21–25.

Krishna, S., Boren, S. A., & Balas, E. A. (2009). Healthcare via cell phones: A systematic review. Telemedicine and e-Health, 15(3), 231–240.

Martinez-Prather, K., & Vandiver, D. M. (2014). Sexting among teenagers in the United States: A retrospective analysis of identifying motivating factors, potential targets, and the role of a capable guardian. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 8(1).

Mitchell, K. J., Finkelhor, D., Jones, L., & Wolak, J. (2012). Prevalence and characteristics of youth sexting: A national study. Pediatrics, 129(1), 13–20.

O'Keefe, G. S., Clarke-Pearson, K., & Council on Communications and Media. (2011). The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics, 127, 800–804.

Osgood, W., Wilson, J., O'Malley, P., Bachman, J., & Johnston, L. (1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 635–655.

Papadopoulos, L. (2010). Sexualisation of young people review. London: Home Office.

Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2011). Schizoid subjectivities? Re-theorising teen-girls' sexual cultures in an era of "sexualisation." Journal of Sociology: Special Issue: Youth Transitions, 47(4), 389–409.

Ringrose, J., Gill, R., Livingstone, S., & Harvey, L. (2012). A qualitative study of children, young people and "sexting." NSPCC.

Selfhout, M. H. W., Branje, S. J. T., Delsing, M., ter Bogt, T. F. M., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2009). Different types of internet use, depression, and social anxiety: The role of perceived friendship quality. Journal of Adolescence, 32(4), 819–833.

The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy. (2008). Sex and tech: Results from a survey of teens and young adults. Washington, DC: Author.