Internet and Social Media's Impact on Presidential Campaigns

Introduction: The Internet's Rise in American Politics

The internet and emerging technologies have fundamentally transformed presidential campaigns. Online campaigning has reshaped political communication, voter outreach, and fundraising. A decade ago, the internet was rarely utilized in politics; in its earliest applications, the majority of users were scholars, military personnel, or technology enthusiasts. Today, however, the internet is a common part of American life. It has been the most rapidly developing resource in American politics since the mid-1990s. With no fewer than 55% of Americans regularly using the internet and almost 70% having access to it, campaigns are investing heavily in websites and emerging technologies to reach supporters, target voters, influence public opinion, and raise funds.

Online Fundraising and Micro-Targeting

The internet has assumed a fast-growing role as a platform for raising and gathering funds. Campaigns air television advertisements that have been criticized as poorly crafted, blunt tools targeted at narrow audiences. To address this limitation, campaigns are using the internet's micro-targeting capabilities to better customize who sees which messages. If a person is a registered voter who spends significant time online, presidential campaigns and major independent groups can analyze that individual's online habits. Campaign websites deploy tracking devices that collect information, monitor registered voters across the internet, and compile profiles cross-referenced with credit card records and other personal demographic data — all of which are used to deliver targeted advertisements (Cline, para. 3).

Some of the most notable examples of internet fundraising have permanently altered the landscape of political finance. Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and John McCain all raised millions of dollars through online efforts (Cline, para. 2–6). Most observers regard Howard Dean's 2004 campaign as the first major internet success story in American politics (Carty 79). Dean was also the first presidential candidate to use the internet as a significant fundraising platform (Clayton 21). Although he lost the Democratic nomination to John Kerry, Dean and his team built a network of blogs, social media profiles, and websites that cultivated a dedicated online following, which he successfully encouraged to contribute to his campaign (Rice 4–5). Given that only four presidential candidates in 2004 maintained blogs, Dean can be regarded as a pioneering figure of the internet fundraising and political blogging movement.

Digital Media, Voter Outreach, and Political Communication

While television remains a powerful medium for reaching voters — with candidates benefiting from free airtime as news media covers debates, party conventions, and campaign trail stories — the internet has emerged as an equally important space. It delivers up-to-the-minute polling figures to voters' smartphones instantly, and expanding access to broadband connections has made it an essential resource for spreading information, raising funds, and rallying supporters. Hillary Clinton used an internet video message to announce her 2008 presidential bid. A notable technological trend that year was the creation of Facebook campaign pages alongside personal campaign websites, offering comprehensive information about candidates' backgrounds, policy positions, and ambitions. Supporters could chat with one another, donate to the campaign, and purchase campaign merchandise from online stores (Eddins, para. 22).

Although many voters have long complained about the negativity of modern campaigns, negative campaign tactics trace their roots to the earliest days of American democracy, well before Washington's presidency ended. The misleading and insulting content in the early press made it difficult for the public to discern candidates' true positions (Pew Research Center, para. 2–5).

Research by the Pew Research Center (para. 2–5) found that in the 2012 election, campaigns were using digital tools to communicate directly with voters — bypassing conventional media filters — and that the Obama campaign posted nearly four times as much content as the Romney campaign, while also being active on nearly twice as many platforms. Digital technology allows candidates to engage in a new kind of "conversation" with voters, making campaigns more dynamic and interactive than they were in the twentieth century. Nevertheless, presidential candidates primarily use direct messaging to broadcast their own messages. The Obama campaign made greater use of citizen voices, though mainly in one specific area.

Raising Voter Turnout Through Online Engagement

The internet can be used to increase voter turnout through engagement and interactivity. During the 2008 election cycle, combining new technologies with traditional media outlets created new opportunities to engage potential voters. Progress was evident as early as 2004, when emails from both the Obama and McCain campaigns incorporated various forms of textual and technical interactivity, including basic hyperlinks, embedded hyperlinks, search functions, audio content, and image links (Hendricks and Kaid 49). A drawback of the 2004 campaign, however, was the absence of an email-forwarding feature, which meant recipients could not easily share messages with others (Hendricks and Kaid 53).

YouTube took a significant initiative by meeting with nearly all candidates at the start of the campaign season and encouraging them to launch YouTube channels (Clayton 145). It also developed "YouChoose," a dedicated section of the site for displaying candidate videos and facilitating public discourse through video comments and ratings (Carty 80). MySpace participated as well, hosting town halls with presidential candidates where members could watch webcasts and submit questions. MySpace also created an "Impact" channel housing all candidates' MySpace pages (Carty 80).

In 2008, old and new media merged to offer greater participation opportunities. ABC, for example, partnered with Facebook to provide debate content (Carty 80–81). CNN and YouTube collaborated to host a debate in which viewers submitted questions via YouTube and candidates answered them on CNN. As Hendricks and Kaid note, the YouTube/CNN debate was an important example of how new media empowers ordinary people to voice their views rather than simply watching debates (169). Obama was particularly active on professional networking sites such as LinkedIn, where he solicited opinions on how the next president could support small businesses and entrepreneurs (Holahan). By this point, nearly all candidates recognized the value of social media as a platform for disseminating information and interacting with the public (Hendricks and Kaid 169).

Conclusion

Throughout American history, social media innovations have repeatedly emerged and reshaped political campaigns, compelling campaign teams to re-strategize and incorporate new media into their operations. Over the past two decades, presidential candidates have had to recognize the influential role of the internet and social media in politics. Political candidates have embraced the internet as a tool for mobilizing supporters, engaging the broader public, collecting voter data, reaching young people, disseminating information, and fundraising. These applications have expanded considerably with the rise of social media platforms.

These platforms offer significant benefits not only to candidates but also to the public, who can easily access election information, organize around shared values, interact directly with candidates, and participate in public discourse. However, citizens should remain aware of the underlying motivations of political candidates who use social media to accumulate votes. To avoid the false impression that candidates use these platforms to build genuine "friendships" with voters, campaign teams should refrain from using terms such as "grassroots" to describe what are fundamentally strategic operations. Avoiding such language can encourage more authentic public participation in the democratic process and allow a stronger, mutually beneficial relationship between candidates and voters to develop.

Works Cited

"The Social Campaign: The Growing Reach of Social Media's Election Impact." MDG Blog. 30 Jan. 2012. Web. 19 Mar. 2012.

Carty, Victoria. Wired and Mobilizing: Social Movements, New Technology, and Electoral Politics. New York: Routledge, 2011. Print.

Clayton, Dewey M. The Presidential Campaign of Barack Obama: A Critical Analysis of a Racially Transcendent Strategy. New York: Routledge, 2010. Print.

Cline, Seth. "The Imperfect Politics of the Internet." 21 Nov. 2012. Web. 15 Oct. 2015.

Eddins, Geri. "Persuading the People: Presidential Campaigns." 2012. Web.

Hendricks, John Allen, and Lynda Lee Kaid. Techno Politics in Presidential Campaigning: New Voices, New Technologies, and New Voters. New York: Routledge, 2011. Print.

Holahan, Catherine. "On the Web, Obama Is the Clear Winner." Bloomberg Businessweek. 5 Mar. 2008. Web. 23 Nov. 2011.

O'Brien, Chris. "Social Media in 2012 Elections Will Make 2008 Look Like Digital Dark Ages." Mercury News. 26 Feb. 2012. Web. 28 Feb. 2012.

Pew Research Center. "How the Presidential Candidates Use the Web and Social Media." Pew Research Center's Journalism Project. 15 Aug. 2012. Web. 15 Oct. 2015.

Rice, Alexis. "The Use of Blogs in the 2004 Presidential Election." CampaignsOnline.org. Oct. 2003. Web. 21 Nov. 2011.

Skelton, Alissa. "Who's Winning the Twitter and Facebook Presidential Election?" Mashable. 18 Feb. 2012. Web. 16 Mar. 2012.

Smith, Aaron. "Smartphone Adoption and Usage: Key Findings." Pew Internet & American Life Project. 11 Jul. 2011. Web. 15 Mar. 2012.