This paper examines two interconnected topics in Australian criminology: the media's depiction of juvenile crime and the psychological and social explanations underlying fraud prevention. The first section applies symbolic interactionism and labelling theory to critique how Australian media outlets misrepresent youth offending, with particular attention to racialised narratives and their consequences for policy and self-identity. The second section analyses the fraud triangle and routine activities theory to assess whether consumer education or enhanced detection and prosecution should take priority in fraud prevention, ultimately arguing for an integrated dual approach. Both sections draw on empirical research to support their arguments.
The media plays a pivotal role in shaping societal perceptions of crime, including those involving juveniles. The portrayal of young people in the context of crime can impact societal attitudes, legislative decisions, and even the self-identity of young individuals. This essay critically evaluates the depiction of young people and juvenile crime in the Australian media, questioning its accuracy and potential implications.
Symbolic interactionism is a sociological perspective that focuses on the interpretation of social behaviour through symbols and meanings. Applied to media coverage of juvenile crime, it suggests that media narratives can create collective symbols associated with youth crime, thereby shaping public opinion (Becker, 2010). In Australia, the media often frames young people involved in crime as "deviant," "violent," or "out of control," exacerbating moral panics about youth (Cunneen, 2011). For example, in Melbourne, the so-called "Apex gang" — largely comprised of young people from South Sudanese backgrounds — was the subject of intense media scrutiny around 2015–2018. Despite Victoria Police stating that "Apex" was more of a loosely affiliated social network rather than a structured criminal organisation, the media frequently portrayed its members as a violent, organised gang. This representation stoked fears about ethnic youth crime and arguably contributed to racialised perceptions of crime in Victoria (Wahlquist, 2018).
Another prominent example is the ABC's Four Corners program, which in 2016 aired footage of young detainees at the Don Dale Youth Detention Centre in the Northern Territory being tear-gassed and physically abused. This exposure led to a royal commission into youth detention; however, much of the media coverage preceding the exposé depicted the detainees as dangerous and uncontrollable, contributing to moral panic about youth crime (Meldrum-Hanna & Worthington, 2016).
At the same time, popular media figures such as Chopper Read glorify gang activity and violence, celebrating delinquency in ways that reinforce behaviours more likely to lead young Australians toward juvenile offending. Thus, on the one hand the media depicts youth as shameful and out of control, while on the other it celebrates individuals who violate the law. Such portrayal connects directly to labelling theory, which posits that individuals can internalise the labels society assigns to them, leading to further delinquency (Lemert, 1951).
Labelling theory, first proposed by sociologist Howard Becker in the 1960s, posits that societal reaction to deviance plays a significant role in the continuation or escalation of deviant behaviour. Becker argued that social groups create deviance by making and enforcing rules, and by labelling those who break these rules as "outsiders" or "deviants" (Becker, 2010).
In the context of youth crime, if young people are consistently labelled as "criminals" or "delinquents" by the media, they may begin to internalise these labels, seeing themselves through the lens of societal judgement. According to labelling theory, this can produce a self-fulfilling prophecy in which individuals, having absorbed these negative labels, engage in further deviant behaviour — thus confirming the accuracy of the label. This process can also generate a cycle of deviance in which labelled individuals continuously exhibit the behaviour they are expected to display.
Empirical evidence supports the argument that media portrayals of youth crime are often skewed and unrepresentative. A study conducted by Carrington, Hogg, and Sozzo (2016) found that the Australian media over-represents violent and serious youth crime despite statistics showing an overall decline in youth crime rates. This misrepresentation can increase fear and misunderstanding within the community, leading to harsher legislative responses toward young offenders.
Furthermore, research demonstrates the media's tendency to racialise crime, disproportionately associating young Indigenous Australians with criminal behaviour, further entrenching stereotypes and bias (Cunneen & Tauri, 2016).
In conclusion, the Australian media's portrayal of juvenile crime is problematic due to its overemphasis on violent youth offending, its racialised narratives, and its potential to produce a self-fulfilling prophecy of criminal behaviour among labelled youth. Such depictions perpetuate negative stereotypes, contribute to social divisions, and may distort policymaking. A pressing need exists for more balanced and accurate media portrayals that account for the complex socio-economic factors contributing to youth crime. The repeated characterisation of young people — particularly those from specific racial or socio-economic backgrounds — as criminals reinforces harmful stereotypes. This practice needs to change if youth are to receive the positive reinforcements that generate healthy, pro-social behaviours. The media plays an important part in the social, psychological, and emotional development of young people and should be held accountable for the narratives it promotes.
Psychological and social explanations provide the basis for more effective fraud prevention by offering insight into the motivations behind fraudulent acts. However, when addressing whether the primary focus of prevention should be on educating consumers or on improving detection and prosecution, a dual approach is likely most effective. Understanding the psychological and social underpinnings of fraud is instrumental in formulating strategies on both fronts.
The fraud triangle theory, proposed by criminologist Donald Cressey (1953), suggests that three conditions typically converge when fraud occurs: pressure, opportunity, and rationalisation. Pressure may stem from financial stressors such as excessive debt or a desire to maintain a lifestyle beyond one's means; personal vices such as gambling or substance addiction can also act as catalysts. Opportunity refers to circumstances in which an individual has access to assets and believes their fraudulent activities will go undetected. Rationalisation implies that fraudsters typically construct self-justifying excuses for their behaviour.
Understanding these elements can directly inform fraud prevention strategies. Consumers can be educated about the pressures that commonly lead to fraudulent behaviour, making them more vigilant against, for example, investment opportunities that seem too good to be true. Organisations can mitigate opportunities for fraud by implementing robust internal controls such as frequent audits and division of responsibilities. Cultivating an ethical organisational culture can also help counteract the rationalisations that justify fraudulent actions.
The routine activities theory, advanced by Cohen and Felson (1979), posits that the likelihood of crime increases when three elements converge: a motivated offender, a suitable target, and the absence of capable guardians. The motivated offender is an individual willing to commit fraud; the suitable target is a potential victim perceived as vulnerable or valuable; and the absence of capable guardians refers to the lack of any person, measure, or system that could prevent the fraudulent act.
This theory also guides prevention strategy. By educating consumers about common scams, the pool of suitable targets can be reduced as individuals become better equipped to protect themselves. The presence of capable guardians can be increased by improving technological security measures and enhancing the detection capabilities of financial institutions and law enforcement. Although directly addressing motivated offenders is challenging, improved detection and prosecution rates can deter potential fraudsters.
"Comparing two core fraud prevention strategies"
"Dual approach yields best fraud prevention outcomes"
You’re 67% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.