Keirsey Temperament Sorter: Idealist Profile in the Workplace
This paper reflects on the author's results from the Keirsey Temperament Sorter (KTS-II), a widely used psychological instrument for assessing personality and workplace fit. The author's results place them within the Idealist category, one of four broad temperament types. The paper examines the defining characteristics of Idealists — including diplomacy, ethical commitment, and a preference for harmony — and considers how these traits translate into workplace strengths and limitations. It also discusses the instrument's validity, its application in assessing cultural competence, and how organizational structure and interpersonal dynamics may affect Idealist job satisfaction.
- Overview of the Keirsey Temperament Sorter: Instrument purpose, validity, and free assessment format
- Idealist Temperament Results and Subtypes: Author's results and four Idealist subtypes explained
- Idealists in the Workplace: Strengths and Cultural Fit: Ethics, diplomacy, cultural competence, and suitable careers
- Diplomacy, Conflict, and Organizational Structure: How Idealists respond to hierarchy, conflict, and rules
- Conclusion: Flexibility and Capacity for Growth: Author's self-assessment of adaptability and change
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The author grounds personal reflection in cited academic sources, lending credibility to what could otherwise be a purely anecdotal account.
- The paper acknowledges the KTS-II's limitations (limited validity evidence) while still making productive use of the instrument, demonstrating critical thinking rather than uncritical acceptance.
- Concrete examples of suitable careers and workplace environments make the abstract personality traits tangible and practically relevant.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper models how to integrate a first-person reflective voice with academic citation and analysis. Rather than simply reporting test results, the author evaluates them critically — questioning what additional information would improve accuracy (e.g., identifying the specific Idealist subtype) and noting where the profile does and does not align with real-world workplace demands.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief overview of the KTS-II instrument and its purpose. It then presents the author's personal results and the four Idealist subtypes. The two central sections analyze Idealist traits in workplace and cultural contexts, drawing on a secondary source on cultural competence. The paper closes with a candid self-assessment of strengths, limitations, and the potential for personal growth beyond temperament.
Overview of the Keirsey Temperament Sorter
The Keirsey Temperament Sorter (KTS-II) is a well-established psychological instrument commonly used by human resources professionals to assess applicant or employee strengths and optimal placement strategies. Although "there is little information available to support the validity of the KTS-II," it nevertheless can be used to "identify work environments congruent with one's personality" (Kelly & Jugovic, 2001, p. 49). Therefore, the test can demonstrate not necessarily aptitude at tasks, but how well an individual might fit into a specific organizational culture. The test is typically a fee-based service offered through psychologists or human resources departments, but a free sample assessment is available on the company's website. The free sample test is brief, consisting of about fifty questions with simple binary responses.
Idealist Temperament Results and Subtypes
My results on the Keirsey Temperament Sorter indicate that I fall within the Idealist category. However, there are four types of Idealists, and the free assessment does not narrow down which of the four types I might be: Champion, Counselor, Healer, or Teacher. Each of these subcategories corresponds to Myers-Briggs Type Indicator assessments — for example, ENFP for Champion or INFJ for Counselor. It would be helpful to know which of these four Idealists I most resemble in order to receive a more accurate self-portrait.
Generally, however, all Idealists favor harmony in social relationships and dislike conflict and confrontation. They tend to be dedicated to personal growth and development, and can be romantic in nature. Some of these qualities may not seem conducive to corporate culture, although some Idealists can prove to be effective visionary leaders who inspire others to reach beyond their self-imposed limitations. Similarly, an Idealist can help reframe ideas and encourage creative, out-of-the-box thinking.
Idealists in the Workplace: Strengths and Cultural Fit
Another feature of Idealists that may be particularly useful in the workplace is the emphasis on ethics and integrity. As Akyeampong et al. (2014) found, the Keirsey Temperament Sorter may be used to assess other factors relevant to job performance, such as cultural competence. It would seem that Idealists are most suited to diverse workplace environments because of their strong tendencies toward diplomacy, good will, and respect for other people. Idealists do not rely on rigidity or closed-mindedness; they instead value the complexities of all situations and are willing to work hard with others to reach mutually beneficial solutions to problems.
For this reason, Idealists often thrive in social work, education, and counseling, but they can be equally effective in fields like journalism or anything involving human interest. Many Idealists would seem to do best in creative enterprises or pursuits that require continual reflection. Unfortunately, Idealists do tend to fantasize and might experience low job satisfaction because of an ongoing tendency to seek change.
Conclusion: Flexibility and Capacity for Growth
Generally I believe I offer a balanced set of assets that can be applied flexibly to a multitude of workplace environments. As an Idealist, I do believe that I am also capable of change. Even if our temperaments remain relatively stable over time, we can change based on our environments and if we are surrounded by supportive people.
References
Akyeampong, K. O., et al. (2014). The relationship between temperament and changes in cultural competency among undergraduate students. Undergraduate Research Symposium, Mankato, MN, April 21, 2014.
Kelly, K. R., & Jugovic, H. (2001). Concurrent validity of the online version of the Keirsey Temperament Sorter. Journal of Career Assessment, 9(1).
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.