KELLY Youth Services: Human Relations and Social Exchange Theory
This paper examines KELLY Youth Services, an Ohio-based nonprofit group home organization founded by former NFL player Joe Kelly, through the lens of two organizational theories: Human Relations Theory and Social Exchange Theory. The paper explores how each theory explains the organization's approach to employee motivation, stakeholder engagement, and community service. It also analyzes KELLY's position on the structure continuum, addresses diversity considerations, and evaluates the strengths and limitations of each theoretical framework. The paper concludes by applying the concept of responsible stewardship, framing KELLY's mission as an expression of servant leadership and civic commitment to youth empowerment.
- Introduction to KELLY Youth Services: Overview of KELLY's mission and founding
- Organizational Theories: Human Relations and Social Exchange Theory applied
- KELLY and the Structure Continuum: Structured vs. unstructured organizational positioning
- Diversity: How both theories address diversity considerations
- Strengths and Limitations: Evaluating each theory's explanatory power
- Appraisal and Responsible Stewardship: Integrative reflection on leadership and stewardship
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its theoretical analysis in a concrete, real-world organization, making abstract concepts like Social Exchange Theory and Human Relations Theory immediately applicable and easier to evaluate.
- It demonstrates intellectual balance by acknowledging the limitations of each theory rather than presenting either as a perfect explanatory framework, which strengthens its credibility.
- The conclusion ties organizational analysis to a broader values-based framework (responsible stewardship), showing the student's ability to connect academic theory with institutional mission and civic purpose.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates comparative theoretical application — using two distinct frameworks side by side to analyze the same organization. Rather than simply describing each theory in isolation, the student consistently returns to KELLY Youth Services as the test case, showing how each theory illuminates different facets of the organization's operations, culture, and stakeholder relationships.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an organizational overview, then introduces and defines both theories before applying them. Subsequent sections address the structure continuum, diversity, and a strengths-and-limitations evaluation of each theory. The paper closes with an integrative appraisal and a values-based reflection on responsible stewardship. This logical progression — from description to theory to application to evaluation — models a standard organizational analysis format appropriate for undergraduate social work or nonprofit management coursework.
Introduction to KELLY Youth Services
KELLY Youth Services is a nonprofit organization that operates group homes in Ohio. It was founded by a former NFL player, Joe Kelly, a first-round pick for the Cincinnati Bengals. The organization focuses on providing support and empowerment for youths and the broader community. Its mission is "to educate, stimulate and motivate youth into becoming self-sufficient, responsible and employable citizens in the community" (KELLY Youth Services, 2016). The organization is designed "to assist in the rehabilitation of its residents by providing a structured disciplined environment based upon basic behavioral principles, educational standards, counseling, treatment care and role modeling," with the goal of increasing "each resident's likelihood of becoming successful independent productive adults" (KELLY Youth Services, 2016).
Organizational Theories
Human Relations Theory and Social Exchange Theory can both explain KELLY Youth Services — the former by focusing on the motivation of employees inspired by a social good, and the latter by explaining how the negotiation of an exchange can create a win-win situation for all parties. KELLY can be understood through these two theories because it offers civic-minded individuals who want to give back to the community an opportunity to assist youths in need. It also enables workers to benefit from their service by gaining experience, training, and tools needed to develop their own social work skills.
Human Relations Theory holds that the attitudes of workers and stakeholders, their relationships, and the style of leadership employed are all instrumental in how well an organization performs. The key concept of the theory centers on the "human" dimension — that is, which aspects of human nature are most instrumental in making the workplace efficient (O'Connor, 1999). The theory maintains that while employees will always be incentivized by financial rewards such as pay, salary, and bonuses, they are not wholly motivated by these alone. Numerous social factors also influence how hard an employee will work to achieve an organization's goals. These variables include: 1) having a sense of belonging, 2) taking pride in one's work, 3) receiving praise and positive feedback, and 4) enjoying feelings of success. The key premise of this theory is that individuals should feel a social benefit to their work — one that is both personal and relational. This focus on human capital helps organizations cultivate more engaged and committed workforces.
Social Exchange Theory holds that the key concepts governing relationships are self-interest and interdependence. These two variables determine how interactions unfold. The theory asserts that social behavior results from a give-and-take phenomenon that can be described in terms of a cost-benefit ratio. Rewards and costs drive relationship and workplace decisions, and outcomes may be both social and economic in nature (Lambe, Wittmann, & Spekman, 2001).
Both theories apply to KELLY Youth Services' functions, rules, and procedures in terms of how the organization views its role in the community and how workers respond to the needs of youths. Human Relations Theory explains how KELLY encourages individuals to work for the organization by calling on people who have skills in tutoring or various therapeutic treatments. It also explains how the organization prioritizes the needs of its clients and supports workers by providing positive feedback — through praise and through relationships established in the workplace — for making a meaningful difference in young people's lives.
Social Exchange Theory explains how KELLY provides benefits to workers in return for their commitment to the organization and to the community. The services KELLY provides to youths require 24-hour care, and in order to secure workers for second and third shifts, the organization offers benefits — such as health care — that give workers personal incentives for working those hours. This trade-off between organizational need and worker benefit is precisely what Social Exchange Theory captures.
KELLY and the Structure Continuum
The organization is structured to draw on both ends of the continuum, offering both structured and unstructured options. On the structured side, KELLY is oriented more toward the functional end of the continuum than the project end, meaning it is focused on providing services that individuals can access rather than tailoring a specific project for each client (Goubko, 2002). While KELLY aims to provide individual youths with appropriate therapy, this is often delegated to counselors who possess experience with particular issues. The organization's standard programs include maternity-oriented services, adult services, transitional living services, and youth mentorship designed to facilitate life goal development.
On the unstructured side, the organization's focus on human individuality and well-being is balanced by its focus on the objective and efficient completion of tasks. KELLY wants every client to reach his or her potential and, to that end, focuses on the unique needs and talents of each individual while identifying opportunities for growth. At the same time, it aims to achieve real results with tangible effects, which is why there is also a focus on measuring outcomes and monitoring development.
References
Goubko, M. V. (2002). Structure of the optimal organization of a continuum of executives. Automation and Remote Control, 63(12), 116–130.
KELLY Youth Services. (2016). Welcome to KELLY Youth Services. Retrieved from
Kissack, H., & Callahan, J. (2010). The reciprocal influence of organizational culture and training and development programs: Building the case for a culture analysis within program planning. Journal of European Industrial Training, 34(4), 365–380.
Lambe, C., Wittmann, C., & Spekman, R. (2001). Social exchange theory and research on business-to-business relational exchange. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 8(3), 1–36.
O'Connor, E. (1999). Minding the workers: The meaning of 'human' and 'human relations' in Elton Mayo. Organization, 6(2), 223–246.
Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. (2013). How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 138–158.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.