This paper presents a critical review of nine academic studies addressing the achievement gap among low-income, predominantly African-American urban students. The reviewed works span a range of approaches — including program evaluations, behavioral experiments, policy analyses, and literature reviews — examining factors such as early literacy interventions, self-regulation, peer values, adult expectations, exposure to violence, preschool programs, and school leadership. Each study is summarized in terms of its purpose, methodology, findings, and relationship to the broader body of research on reducing educational inequality. Together, the reviews offer a comprehensive overview of both the promise and limitations of current strategies for closing the achievement gap in high-poverty communities.
The paper employs annotated bibliography-style comparative analysis, a graduate-level skill in which each source is not only summarized but evaluated for methodological rigor, originality, and relevance to a unifying research question. The recurring cross-referencing between studies ("consistent with other articles," "stands apart from the other articles") demonstrates the ability to construct a coherent scholarly conversation from disparate sources.
The paper is organized as a sequential series of article reviews, each covering one study. Every review consists of two paragraphs: the first summarizing the study's hypothesis, methods, and findings; the second situating the study within the broader literature and assessing its contribution. The paper opens with a program-effectiveness study and moves through behavioral, motivational, policy, and leadership perspectives, building a multi-dimensional picture of the achievement gap.
Robert E. Slavin and Nancy A. Madden's article "Reducing the Gap: Success for All and the Achievement of African-American Students" examines the success that one particular program, Success for All (SFA), has had in narrowing the achievement gap among Black children since 1987. The study was motivated by the authors' observation of a lack of overall progress in narrowing the achievement gap since the early 1980s. Faced with this absence of positive results, the authors sought to highlight the SFA program due to its continued success across a multitude of cities. Both authors are highly familiar with the impact of SFA, having studied its results since 1993. In this particular study, they conclude that the SFA program consistently raised the standardized test scores of Black and Hispanic students compared to non-SFA programs, thus lowering the achievement gap. The authors maintain that the research supports two distinct advantages of SFA that help narrow the gap: (1) more effective instruction and (2) a differential positive effect on student achievement, even in integrated settings.
This article is part of a broader group of works that examines what methods are available and effective for reaching inner-city, lower-SES students — particularly African-American students — and how those methods are measured. This article focuses on one specific program and its relative success rate, synthesizing already-conducted research. Like all of the articles selected for this review, the authors place strong emphasis on standardized test scores, particularly the Woodcock and Durrell scales. The study population of elementary and middle school-age children in inner cities who are eligible for free and reduced-price lunches is consistent with the population groups examined in the other reviewed articles.
Gary W. Evans and Jennifer Rosenbaum's article "Self-Regulation and the Income-Achievement Gap" aims to justify the authors' hypothesis that income level affects the development of a child's self-regulatory skills and that the lack of self-regulatory skills has a negative impact on a child's academic achievement. The authors also propose that the failure of adolescents to develop self-regulating skills operates independently of parental investment. Their goal is to greatly expand on an already-developed area of research by combining two well-tested theories related to the cognitive development of young children. Based on a series of experiments, the authors determined that the delayed gratification skills of nine-year-olds were related to income level, that those skills have a positive correlation with math and English grades, and that delayed gratification is not interrelated with parental investment. Thus, the authors find that wealthier parents tend to raise children with greater cognitive abilities who achieve greater academic success.
In relation to the other articles reviewed, this article offers more original insight than most because it establishes an innovative theory that builds upon existing established knowledge and then tests that theory — something few of the other authors have done. The authors conducted multiple controlled experiments to test their hypotheses and also drew on the previous research of others. Their research methods were thorough, combining standardized testing with personal interviews and parental histories. The authors performed independent research using well-established behavioral measurement indices with a large pool of diverse subjects. Regarding the causal link between deficient self-regulatory skills and poor academic achievement, the authors propose that future research focus on how poor self-regulatory skills develop among low-income children.
April Z. Taylor and Sandra Graham's article "An Examination of the Relationship Between Achievement Values and Perceptions of Barriers Among Low-SES African-American and Latino Students" examines the link between achievement values and perceptions of barriers in low-income minority adolescent males. The authors seek to identify and address the motivational challenges facing minority adolescent boys in inner-city schools. They found that minority, low-income students all tend to value high academic achievers during elementary school years, but that low-income minority boys in 7th grade tend to nominate low-achieving academic students as peers they most admire and wish to emulate. A secondary aspect of the article illustrates the perceptions this same group holds regarding barriers imposed by external forces, which further de-motivates the students. The results of the authors' research are consistent with numerous unrelated studies reflecting that succeeding academically can be seen as being "too white," and that athletic and sexual prowess among minority, low-income boys has gained increasingly high priority as an indicator of peer status.
This article studies the antithesis of the other reviewed articles — specifically, how students themselves present their own challenges. The study built on prior research by attempting to isolate the role of gender and grades and the relationship between values, beliefs, and perceived barriers to opportunity. The mathematical basis for the research holds that motivation is a product of expectancy and value, where expectancy measures the perceived likelihood that an outcome will be obtained and value represents how much that outcome is desired. This study is therefore unique in that one of its objectives is to measure the mental and emotional investment that African-American and Latino students have in academic achievement, rather than focusing solely on actual academic performance as the other studies do.
Phillip J. Belfiore, Ruth Auld, and David L. Lee's article "The Disconnect of Poor-Urban Education: Equal Access and a Pedagogy of Risk Taking" is sharply critical of the efforts of administrators and educators in low-income schools. The authors argue that the only real goal in these schools is to teach and practice the basic mechanical skills necessary for the school to receive passing standardized test scores. The authors endorse two literacy pilot programs that demonstrate how good teaching and faculty accountability can increase early reading skills. These programs are presented as especially useful in closing the gap between poor urban school performance and standard learning expectations in the United States. The FirstRead Program is an after-school program teaching proper phonetics to 178 free and reduced-price lunch school children in grades K–8. According to the authors, FirstRead proved that significant progress can be made in under one school year if the school and parents "promote the same academic agenda" (Belfiore et al., 2005). The PhonicsQ system uses oral and written standards to help students decode and encode new words; this component was completed by 28 second-grade students in an inner-city school and also showed improvement in reading readiness within less than one academic year.
This article examines the state of the achievement gap by recognizing and comparing three possible approaches to addressing it. The first is to assume that external influences have little bearing on the performance of inner-city students and therefore to take no proactive measures. The second is to commit to eliminating the gap entirely by implementing programs that raise urban student performance to the level of students in non-urban schools. The authors refute both approaches as neither responsible nor genuinely helpful. Instead, they point to the two subject studies as examples of how to tap into the learning potential of each individual student using pedagogically sound teaching practices.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.