Skip to main content
Essay Undergraduate 1,971 words

Managing Organizational Change: GROW Model and Employee Issues

~10 min read
Abstract

This paper examines strategies for managing organizational change and improving employee productivity in a globalized business environment. Using the GROW problem-solving model — Goals, Reality, Obstacles/Options, and Way Forward — the paper identifies key employee-related challenges, particularly in communication and compensation. It analyzes potential solutions, outlines an implementation strategy, and discusses measurement techniques such as periodic employee surveys. The paper uses Google's employee benefits model as a practical example of how addressing employee needs can raise productivity. Ultimately, it argues that organizations must move beyond outdated policies and adopt flexible, employee-centered strategies to remain competitive.

Key Takeaways
  • Introduction and the Problem of Employee Performance: Globalization drives need for updated employee policies
  • Using the GROW Problem-Solving Model: GROW model framework applied to organizational challenges
  • Potential Solutions to Employee Challenges: Communication and compensation as key solution areas
  • Creating an Implementation Strategy: Steps to implement employee-centered policy changes
  • Measuring Success: Surveys and data analysis track improvement outcomes
  • Conclusion: GROW model synthesized into final productivity recommendations
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples

What makes this paper effective

  • Consistently applies a single analytical framework (the GROW model) across multiple workplace problems, giving the argument coherent structure and practical utility.
  • Uses concrete evidence, such as a Watson Wyatt survey showing 57% of workers view performance evaluations as unfair, to ground abstract management concepts in measurable data.
  • Incorporates a real-world company example (Google's employee benefits program) to illustrate how the proposed strategies translate into practice.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates applied framework analysis — taking an established problem-solving model (GROW) and systematically applying it to two distinct organizational challenges (communication and compensation). Each application follows the same logical sequence: goal identification, honest assessment of current state, obstacle identification, and action planning. This technique shows how a single analytical lens can unify diverse workplace problems under one coherent management approach.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with a broad argument about globalization and workplace change, then introduces the GROW model as the primary analytical tool. Two central sections apply the model to communication and compensation challenges respectively. A dedicated implementation section translates theory into action steps, followed by a measurement section focused on employee surveys and managerial evaluation. The conclusion synthesizes all components and reinforces the paper's central recommendation.

Introduction and the Problem of Employee Performance

Globalization is changing the workplace at an incredible pace. Because competition is more severe, employers must ensure that productivity levels remain high. Achieving this objective requires that all employers address the concerns of their employees; otherwise, they could face high employee turnover and low productivity. The most successful organizations understand these realities and incorporate addressing employee issues as a core part of their organizational philosophy.

Over the last several years, the issue of employee performance and productivity has been continually brought to the forefront. Globalization is changing the workplace dramatically, requiring companies to employ highly skilled workers in order to maintain their competitive edge. As a result, strategies that were effective twenty years ago have become relics of the past. For any employer to remain competitive today requires innovative strategies in establishing effective policies and procedures, fair pay and rewards systems, and sound promotion and disciplinary procedures. Without these, a business faces challenges that will greatly affect productivity.

An example of this disconnect can be seen in a study conducted by the consulting firm Watson Wyatt. After sampling 2,044 workers, the firm determined that nearly 57% believed any kind of performance evaluation was rated unfairly — despite the fact that nearly 60% said they understood how the performance system worked when they arrived (Landa, 1999). This reveals an underlying trend in which managers have become so disconnected from their employees that workers perceive the workplace as unfair. The procedures used for everything from employee evaluation to compensation are often built on ideas that are no longer relevant.

In order for any organization to remain competitive, it must thoroughly understand how employee-related issues need to be addressed both now and in the future. Doing so requires identifying the problem using the GROW problem-solving model, carefully examining possible solutions, implementing a strategy, and determining whether that strategy has been successful. Together, these elements show employers how they can improve their employee policies and procedures to maintain high levels of productivity.

Using the GROW Problem-Solving Model

The GROW problem-solving model involves four core principles: Goals, Reality, Obstacles/Options, and Way Forward. What makes this model especially useful for employers is its flexibility — it can be applied to set goals and identify problems across many different areas of an organization.

When examining the principle of Goals, it is clear that before any strategy can be implemented, management must determine what outcomes they want to achieve. This involves setting objectives related to productivity, performance, reviews, and employee attitudes, with the aim of being as specific as possible in identifying all areas required to meet the stated goals.

Next, management must examine Reality — taking an honest assessment of how far the organization currently is from achieving its objective. In this context, management would review the existing employee policy and compare it with the practices of other organizations, identifying which issues are preventing progress toward the objective. Acknowledging that challenges exist is essential; if everything were working, the goals would already be met.

Once specific issues are identified, management examines various Options that could overcome the different obstacles. This means finding out what matters most to employees and which areas need improvement, then developing workable solutions to address those obstacles.

Finally, management determines the Way Forward — once the strategy and plan are set, consistent action must be taken to ensure the goals are achieved. Applying this model to the evaluation of employer policies and procedures effectively addresses employee issues and helps increase overall productivity (Green, 2005).

Potential Solutions to Employee Challenges

One of the most significant problems facing any organization is communication. Many managers operate on the assumption that employees are simply paid to do a job and should follow directions without question. This attitude may have functioned in earlier decades, but globalization has fundamentally changed the nature of business, requiring managers to adapt. Remaining competitive demands that all managers develop strong communication and active listening skills, as they serve as a bridge between upper management and their teams.

One way to achieve this is to apply flexibility in management style. Managers must clearly communicate to team members what objectives need to be achieved and ensure that employees receive immediate and fair feedback. When issues arise, the manager must be prepared to address them using the GROW model.

For example, if management wants to improve productivity but notices that employees are not responding to meetings or incentives, the first step is to identify clear goals for improving communication, with success measured by a rise in productivity. Management must then make an honest assessment of where things currently stand — recognizing, critically, that managers themselves may be part of the problem as well as the solution. Anonymous employee surveys can help identify the specific communication obstacles that exist. Once this information is gathered, management and employees can work together to find ways to improve communication. Periodic surveys and focus groups can serve as consistent follow-up mechanisms to ensure that the most important objectives are being met. Effective communication and listening are essential in any organization for ensuring that everyone understands and works toward common goals (Green, 2005).

A second potential solution involves understanding the diverse needs of employees. For many years, employers offered a single traditional pension plan that was expected to meet everyone's needs. However, as the economy has shifted, the workforce now includes multiple generations working side by side, each with its own specific needs and expectations. Taking a one-size-fits-all approach to employee benefits can result in dramatically lower productivity, as employees come to believe that management is out of touch with their needs. Over time, this perception leads to declining output and higher turnover, as key employees seek opportunities elsewhere.

Using the GROW model in this context, the most obvious goal would be to improve productivity and reduce overall employee turnover. The Reality phase involves reviewing current compensation packages and comparing them with what competitors are offering. Management must then identify the obstacles contributing to the problem, gathering accurate information by surveying employees about what matters most to them. Human resources can ask prospective employees what they are looking for in an ideal employer, generating specific opportunities for management to address. Once this information is gathered, management must begin implementing what it has determined to be the most effective course of action (Clinch, 1991).

2 locked sections · 610 words
Sign up to read the full analysis
Creating an Implementation Strategy390 words
Once challenges and opportunities have been identified, management must create an effective plan to address employee-related issues. This means assessing where the company currently stands, examining the obstacles…
Measuring Success220 words
Once a new strategy has been implemented, management must use a variety of techniques to determine whether the changes are effective. Consistent follow-up is essential to ensure that nothing is overlooked. One…
Read the full paper →
Plus 130,000+ examples & all writing tools

Conclusion

Clearly, a number of different factors can affect employee productivity within an organization. Globalization is changing the workplace in ways that make old strategies and policies increasingly obsolete. Employers must now focus on improving employee productivity through updated and responsive policies and procedures. One effective tool for doing so is the GROW model, which structures the process of identifying goals, assessing reality, examining obstacles and options, and charting a way forward.

Two potential solutions that can be applied in the workplace involve communication and employee compensation. Managers can use the GROW model to identify specific ways to overcome challenges in both areas. This is significant because addressing the root sources of employee dissatisfaction has a direct and positive impact on performance. However, once a strategy is implemented, managers must take care not to fall back into previous patterns. An effective system of follow-up is essential to ensure that employee issues continue to be addressed.

One valuable tool for achieving this is the consistent use of employee surveys, in which workers are asked about their concerns and what matters most to them. This information can be used to evaluate poor management by isolating concerns to particular teams, and to highlight company-wide problems. Once this process is in place, management will have the ongoing knowledge needed to understand what issues are most important to employees and how those issues can be effectively addressed.

Bibliography

Bower, T. (2003, June 18). Turning around a problem employee. Retrieved March 21, 2010, from Tech Republic website: http://articles.techrepublic.com.com/5100-10878_11-5035052.html

Clinch, G. (1991). Employee compensation and firms' research and development activities. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(1), 59–78.

Common workplace problems and solutions. (2010). Retrieved March 21, 2010, from Work Expert website: http://workexpert.co.cc/commonworkplaceproblems/

Gerhart, B. (1995). Employee compensation: Theory, practice and evidence. Cornell University.

Green, P. (2005). Business system analysis. Idea Group Publishing.

Landa, M. (1999). A contrary look at employee performance appraisal. Retrieved March 21, 2010, from All Business website:

Stross, R. (2009). Planet Google. Free Press.

Key Concepts in This Paper
GROW Model Employee Productivity Organizational Change Communication Employee Compensation Performance Evaluation Globalization Management Strategy Employee Surveys Workplace Improvement
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Managing Organizational Change: GROW Model and Employee Issues. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/managing-organizational-change-grow-model-864

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.