This essay argues that marijuana should be decriminalized in the United States. It examines the historical circumstances under which marijuana was banned in 1937 and challenges the major arguments used to keep it illegal. Drawing on WHO research, comparative toxicology, and drug policy data, the paper contends that marijuana is less harmful than alcohol and tobacco, is not a meaningful gateway drug, and is not causally linked to crime. It also highlights the enormous financial and social costs of prohibition — including over $12 billion annually in enforcement spending and millions of arrests — and draws a cautionary parallel to the failed alcohol Prohibition of the 1920s.
The paper employs a classic refutation structure: it introduces common objections to marijuana legalization, then counters each with cited evidence. This technique, known as the "they say / I say" approach, makes the argument more persuasive because it directly engages with opposing views rather than ignoring them.
The essay opens with historical context and a clear thesis, then moves through four argumentative sections: health risks, the gateway and crime myths, enforcement costs, and a policy conclusion. Each section is self-contained but builds cumulatively toward the final call for legalization. The references include government sources, scientific journalism, and drug policy organizations, reflecting a range of evidence types typical of undergraduate policy writing.
Marijuana was declared an illegal drug in the United States with the passing of the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937 under dubious circumstances. Congress passed the bill after barely a minute of debate, which included a false statement by a supporter of the bill claiming that the American Medical Association (AMA) endorsed it — when in fact it did not (Whitebread, 1995).
Since that time, numerous studies have shown that marijuana is less harmful than tobacco and alcohol. Despite the available evidence and the enormous cost of enforcing the marijuana ban, it is difficult to understand why this relatively harmless drug continues to remain illegal in the United States. This essay argues why marijuana should be decriminalized without further delay.
Opponents of legalizing marijuana contend that it is a dangerous drug — but this is far from the truth. For example, there has not been a single recorded case of death due to marijuana overdose. By contrast, a legal intoxicant like alcohol results in the death of approximately 5,000 people every year due to overdose. The reason for this disparity lies in the toxicology: the ratio of cannabinoids necessary for intoxication is 40,000:1, while that for alcohol is generally between 4:1 and 10:1 ("Answers to Frequently Asked Questions," 2005). Cannabinoids are the chemicals in marijuana responsible for intoxication. As such, marijuana is one of the least toxic substances known and would have to be consumed in physically impossible quantities to prove fatal.
It would not be wrong to conclude that the rationale behind the continuing criminalization of marijuana is based on false premises and is difficult to defend. Most scientific studies have conclusively shown that marijuana is a far less harmful drug than alcohol and tobacco. The cost of enforcing the existing harsh laws against marijuana possession is unnecessary and diverts the attention of the American justice system, which would be better served in fighting violent crime and terrorism. As such, there is no reason why marijuana should not be legalized forthwith.
You’re 38% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.