War on Drugs: Drug Trafficking, Terrorism, and U.S. Policy
This paper examines the War on Drugs, tracing the concept from President Nixon's 1971 initiative through contemporary policy debates. It analyzes how drug trafficking finances terrorism, with particular focus on Colombian organizations FARC and AUC, whose revenues from cocaine and extortion have fueled political violence. The paper also considers the Obama administration's public-health framing of drug addiction, the social impact of incarceration on minority communities, and the historical origins of the narco-terrorism link in Colombia during the 1980s. The author argues that a passive policy stance is insufficient and that an aggressive, multifaceted approach to restricting drug access and trafficking remains essential to long-term social and economic stability.
- Introduction to the War on Drugs: Origins, prison systems, and minority communities
- The Obama Administration's Approach: Public health framing versus aggressive restriction
- War on Drugs and Terrorism in Colombia: FARC, AUC, M-19, and cocaine trafficking origins
- The Drug-Terrorism Financial Structure: Revenue statistics and workforce growth in trafficking
- Taxation, Protection, and Terrorist Funding: How tax avoidance drives terrorist-trafficker alliances
- Conclusion: Policy recommendations and future research questions
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds its policy argument in specific historical case studies, particularly the Colombian narco-terrorism connection, giving the abstract debate concrete empirical weight.
- Incorporates quantitative evidence — such as FARC revenue percentages and employee growth statistics — to substantiate claims about drug trafficking's financial scale.
- Balances multiple policy perspectives (the Nixon-era aggressive stance, the Obama administration's public-health approach, and the Colombian government's experience) before arriving at a reasoned conclusion.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of comparative policy analysis: it contrasts the U.S. domestic debate over drug legalization with the real-world consequences observed in Colombia, using that comparison to argue against a passive policy stance. This move — grounding a normative argument in documented international precedent — is a classic strategy for strengthening policy-oriented academic writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a historical overview of the War on Drugs and its domestic social consequences, then presents the current administration's contrasting approach. The central sections shift to Colombia, tracing the origins and financial mechanics of the drug-terrorism link through FARC, AUC, and the M-19 movement. A focused section on taxation and protection fees precedes a conclusion that synthesizes the argument and poses a series of forward-looking policy questions.
Introduction to the War on Drugs
The concept of the "War on Drugs" was first coined by President Nixon in 1971 in an effort to discourage the illegal trafficking of drugs. The primary motivation was the way many states were falling victim to the dynamics of the drugs-and-terrorism links prevalent in the region. Numerous studies have demonstrated authentic connections between the drug trade and how a majority of its profits are used to fund terrorism and other destructive activities.
Throughout the late nineteenth century and into the modern era, numerous parts of the United States have faced disruptions to the peace process because of the growth of the drug industry. The debate over the War on Drugs now revolves around whether certain drugs should be legalized or prohibited and how their trafficking and distribution can be monitored effectively. In a 2011 article published in The New York Times, the author argued that one of the major reasons drug addiction has played such a persistent role in American life is the inefficiency of the prison system. Specifically, the rigidity and inadequate monitoring within prisons cultivate criminal traits in first-time offenders (The New York Times, 2011).
The article also claims that the structure of prisons and criminal law does not support confining serious offenders; instead, it results in low-level criminals engaging in drug or alcohol abuse both inside and outside of prison, thus cycling them back into incarceration for offenses within the same domains. This dynamic, the article argues, disproportionately affects minority communities — particularly African Americans — who develop drug-dependent behaviors more quickly and are far more socially vulnerable due to deprived living conditions, falling wages, and rising prejudice and injustice (The New York Times, 2011). Their weakened social standing also makes them far more susceptible to drug traffickers who offer what appears to be a financially viable escape for themselves and their families. This is a compelling reason to support the aggressive continuation of the War on Drugs — not only through the legalization or restriction of certain substances, but also through dismantling the financial and social stronghold that drug trafficking organizations maintain within the United States.
References
Duzan, M. J. (1994). Death beat: A Colombian journalist's life inside the cocaine wars (P. Eisner, Ed. & Trans.). Harper Collins Publishers.
Ehrenfeld, R. (1990). Narcoterrorism. Basic Books.
Falcoff, M. (2000). Colombia: The problem that will not go away. AEI Latin American Outlook, March 2000.
Hudson, R. A. (1995). Colombia's Palace of Justice tragedy revisited: A critique of the conspiracy theory. Terrorism and Political Violence, 7, 100–103, 119–121.
Institute for Behavior and Health. (2011). Global Commission on Drug Policy offers reckless, vague drug legalization proposal; current drug policy should be improved through innovative linkage of prevention, treatment and the criminal justice system.
Kempe, F. (1990). Divorcing the dictator: America's bungled affair with Noriega. G. P. Putnam's Sons.
Laqueur, W. (1999). The new terrorism: Fanaticism and the arms of mass destruction. Oxford University Press.
Suarez, A. (2000). [FARC revenue breakdown data]. Referenced in Falcoff (2000).
The Economist. (2001). A survey of Colombia: Drugs, war and democracy. The Economist.
The New York Times. (2011, October 30). Falling crime, teeming prisons.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.