This paper examines the market structure and operational decisions facing a low-calorie microwavable food company. It identifies the industry as operating under both perfect competition at the niche level and oligopoly among large food manufacturers, citing competitors such as Lean Cuisine, Healthy Choice, and Weight Watchers Smart Ones. The paper analyzes factors that drive changes in market structure, including acquisition and divestiture activity, and discusses short-run versus long-run production and cost-minimization strategies. It also evaluates pricing policies—including product placement and assimilation/contrast effects—and concludes with recommendations for improving profitability and delivering value to stakeholders through targeted marketing.
Market structure is a microeconomics term that encompasses the interconnected attributes of a market. The variables examined when considering market structure include characteristics of buyers and sellers, competition, product differentiation, and ease of entry into and exit from the market. Factors such as the number and strength of buyers and sellers, along with any collusion that may develop among them, are highly influential on market structure. An analysis of the competition will consider the occurrence and degree of product differentiation taking place. Finally, two important attributes of market structure are the ease of entry and exit from the existing market.
Traditionally, four fundamental market structure types are recognized: (1) Perfect competition, in which many buyers and sellers engage without being able to control prices; (2) Oligopoly, in which a number of large sellers have established some control over prices; (3) Monopoly, in which a single seller maintains near absolute control over supply and, therefore, over prices; and (4) Monopsony, in which a single buyer exercises considerable control over demand and, as a result, over prices.
The strongest competitive forces are the drivers of profitability for a market; hence these competitive forces are key to an effective analysis and to the formulation of market strategy. It is critical to recognize that the most relevant competitive forces are not always immediately apparent, which means that conducting an assessment of market structure effectiveness for the operations of a particular company is a complex endeavor.
The most likely market structure in which this low-calorie food company operates is perfect competition at the niche level and oligopoly among the large food manufacturing companies that have acquired other brands and businesses. It is helpful to consider that new low-calorie foods may be introduced to the market as niche products, but robust launches that result in a strong consumer following typically develop into entire product lines.
Two leading competitors in the low-calorie microwavable food industry are Lean Cuisine and Healthy Choice. Lean Cuisine holds a 20.7% share of the single-serve frozen dinner market, with Healthy Choice (ConAgra) holding a 10.8% share (Newman, 2012). Another competitor, Weight Watchers Smart Ones (Heinz Frozen Foods), holds an 11.4% share (Newman, 2012). Over the 52-week period in which SymphonyIRI Group was measuring activity, market data showed market share increasing by 10.2 points for Smart Ones, dipping by 1.0 point for Lean Cuisine, and dropping by 0.2 points for Healthy Choice (Newman, 2012).
The food industry, along with many other industries, has experienced substantial pressure from takeover activity (Weston & Chui, 1996). Two primary objectives of these takeovers are augmenting existing product lines and expanding the geographic reach of brands, typically into international markets. Acquisition is an effective approach for companies that have sufficient brand strength and robust resources. Conversely, successful companies attract takeover activity from firms looking to balance brand portfolios or expand into a growing product market. Historically, the market has reacted positively to divestitures of non-core activities and positively to acquisitions in related core activities. However, there is evidence that this trend may not be continuing in the present market context.
"Short-run versus long-run cost minimization decisions"
"Isocost analysis and divestiture triggers"
"Pricing strategies and consumer perception effects"
"Targeted marketing recommendations for stakeholder value"
You’re 36% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 4 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.