Maximizing Resources in a Tertiary Healthcare Facility
This paper examines how a 110-bed tertiary teaching healthcare facility can better utilize its available resources by addressing a lack of interdepartmental coordination in information technology acquisitions. Using SWOT analysis, the paper identifies the hospital's internal strengths and weaknesses alongside external opportunities and threats. A force-field analysis then evaluates potential solutions, leading to two cost-effective recommendations: deploying a staff survey via the hospital intranet and creating awareness posters. The paper discusses implementation steps, validation of the survey instrument, and the broader challenge of organizational inertia in large bureaucratic institutions.
- Introduction: Resource gaps from poor coordination across departments
- Background and Overview: 110-bed hospital with fragmented IT systems
- SWOT Analysis of the Healthcare Facility: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats identified
- Force-Field Analysis and Idea Generation: Lewin's framework evaluates enabling and restraining forces
- Selecting and Implementing Solutions: Intranet survey and awareness posters chosen and launched
- Conclusion: Resource maximization improves patient care outcomes
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper applies two complementary analytical frameworks — SWOT and force-field analysis — in sequence, so each tool builds logically on the other's findings.
- Structured tables present the SWOT categories and idea assessments clearly, making complex organizational information easy to scan and compare.
- The paper grounds its recommendations in feasibility, explicitly rejecting cost-prohibitive ideas and prioritizing low-cost, immediately actionable solutions.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the effective use of applied analytical frameworks to translate abstract organizational problems into concrete action steps. By anchoring each framework in cited scholarly sources (Cravens, Stanford, Cronshaw & McCulloch), the author shows how theoretical tools are operationalized in a real-world institutional context, a technique central to applied management and health administration writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a problem-solution structure: an introduction frames the general resource-maximization challenge; a background section profiles the specific hospital; SWOT and force-field analyses diagnose the problem and generate ideas; a selection section narrows ideas to feasible options; an implementation section describes rollout and instrument validation; and a brief conclusion connects the findings to broader healthcare quality goals. This mirrors the action-research cycle common in organizational development literature.
Introduction
In many cases, companies of all sizes and types fail to realize the full benefits of their available resources due to a lack of coordination between departments, so-called "turf battles," and a reluctance to share knowledge, among other reasons. As a result, both internal and external customer service and profitability suffer. There are steps that organizations can take to maximize their available resources, including environmental analytical techniques such as SWOT and force-field analyses. To gain fresh insights into how these methods can be used to maximize resources, this paper reviews the relevant literature, applies both frameworks to a tertiary healthcare facility, and summarizes key findings in the conclusion.
Background and Overview
The organization in question is a 110-bed tertiary teaching healthcare facility that provides a full range of medical and surgical services. The facility is organized into several departments and services that provide administrative support for clinicians and healthcare workers. Although there is an information resource department, the hospital has a number of legacy computer systems still in place and no facility-wide information resource management plan to guide future acquisitions. There is also no coordination between departments when purchasing new information and communications technology (IT) equipment. These constraints have kept the hospital mired in an outdated network that requires constant maintenance and adjustments to achieve cross-platform compatibility. This lack of coordination represents a key opportunity for improvement, as discussed further below.
SWOT Analysis of the Healthcare Facility
Because complex problems require complex solutions, it is important to identify all of the issues involved in developing an innovative working environment. For this purpose, a SWOT analysis can provide the framework needed to identify opportunities for improvement. According to Cravens (2000), the purpose of a SWOT analysis is to identify key issues that will provide decision-makers with the information they need to make informed strategic choices. The SWOT analysis identifies the respective strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats related to an organization's environment: strengths consist of positive aspects that are internal to the entity; weaknesses are negative aspects that are internal to the entity; opportunities are positive aspects that are external to the entity; and threats are negative aspects that are external to the entity (Cravens, 2000). These aspects of the SWOT analysis are applied to the tertiary healthcare facility's key opportunity in Table 1 below.
Table 1: SWOT Analysis of Tertiary Healthcare Facility
Strengths
1. The hospital has a dedicated and well-trained professional healthcare and support services staff that has received accreditation from the Joint Commission.
2. The hospital is fiscally sound.
3. Generally, the hospital has state-of-the-art medical and diagnostic equipment.
4. There is a hospital-wide intranet available.
5. There is a graphic arts department available.
Weaknesses
1. Across the board, the hospital has an obsolete and aging information technology (IT) infrastructure.
2. There is a profound lack of coordination between departments for new IT purchases.
3. There are no formal guidelines in place to guide IT acquisitions.
4. There is no formal way for staff to offer suggestions and recommendations about what type of IT equipment is needed in their departments.
5. Employee morale in many departments is low.
Opportunities
1. A growing elderly population will need specialized services in the future.
2. Innovations in cloud computing may provide some cost-effective solutions.
Threats
1. A sluggish economy has adversely affected medical billing.
2. A national nursing shortage will impact the hospital's recruiting and retention efforts.
Conclusion
Providing world-class healthcare in the 21st century is a challenging enterprise, but patients deserve the best care that hospitals can provide. Because resources are by definition scarce, it is important for organizations of all types and sizes to maximize their resources in order to achieve a competitive advantage. For healthcare providers, this competitive advantage translates into more efficient operations and improved healthcare outcomes. Analytical frameworks such as SWOT and force-field analysis offer practical, structured pathways for identifying opportunities and implementing cost-effective solutions, even within large and bureaucratically complex institutions.
References
Chaudron, D. (2008). Master of all you survey: Planning employee surveys. OrganizedChange.com.
Cravens, D. W. (2000). Strategic marketing (6th ed.). Irwin McGraw-Hill.
Cronshaw, S. F., & McCulloch, A. N. (2008). Reinstating the Lewinian vision: From force field analysis to organization field assessment. Organization Development Journal, 26(4), 89–90.
Grinnell, R. M., Jr., & Unrau, Y. A. (2005). Social work research and evaluation: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Oxford University Press.
Stanford, N. (2005). Organization design: The collaborative approach. Butterworth-Heinemann.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.