This paper examines how American media — including news outlets, Hollywood films, and court television programs — shapes public perception of the judicial system. Drawing on a U.S. Department of Justice study measuring court perceptions across racial and ethnic groups, the paper argues that media portrayals contribute to views of courts as unfair, ineffectual, and biased. The analysis finds that White viewers are most influenced by procedural justice narratives in cop films, while minority groups respond more strongly to portrayals of unequal treatment. A notable paradox emerges: Latino-Americans hold more favorable court perceptions than other groups, possibly due to reduced exposure to English-language media. The paper concludes that improved civic education could reduce susceptibility to misleading media narratives.
Residents of the United States have been noted many times for their poor understanding of American history and government. This is, no doubt, connected with deficiencies in the public education system at the K–12 level. Many Americans do not understand the political theory behind the U.S. Constitution and the principles of limited government (Feith, xi). As a result, they cannot grasp the constitutional principles governing the role of the judge, the jury, and the prosecution in deciding a court case (Feith, 13).
The lack of education in American civics leaves many people uninformed and impressionable when it comes to issues involving the court system. These people hold unrealistic expectations of the courts and are unsympathetic to the challenges the courts face. The thesis of this paper is that the American media plays a significant role in the perception of courts as unfair, ineffectual, and unresponsive to citizens. Television programs and film tend to influence White viewers regarding the perceived abuse of criminal procedure by criminals, whereas minority groups tend to focus on the unfair outcomes and unequal treatment presented in such media.
A study by the U.S. Department of Justice found key differences between African-Americans and Latino-Americans in their perception of the courts. The study measured perception through respondents' support for the courts, the perceived quality with which courts handle cases, the fairness of court procedures and outcomes, and the willingness of individuals with recent court experience to return to court on a similar matter in the future (Rottman, 1).
Generally, respondents with recent court experience tended to have a more negative perception of court fairness, respect, and trustworthiness than those without recent court experience (4–5). The study also found that African-Americans had the least favorable perception of courts in all areas measured (4). Latino-Americans exhibited a similarly unfavorable perception of courts regarding fairness of outcomes and unequal group treatment. However, in the areas of procedural justice and overall support for the courts, Latino-Americans held a more favorable perception than even White respondents (5).
Many news outlets focus on crimes committed by the wealthy for sensationalistic reasons, capitalizing on the nation's obvious economic inequities. News outlets often portray rich, powerful, and arrogant defendants represented by elite legal teams — lawyers who are sharp and willing to do anything to win (Ahmed). In these stories, courts are frequently depicted as weak and susceptible to manipulation by attorneys whose clients escape with little more than a slap on the wrist.
Movies such as Dirty Harry tend to shape White viewers' perceptions in the area of procedural justice, suggesting that certain constitutional protections for the accused are exploited by criminals and their unethical lawyers. In these plots, the viewer is made aware of the criminal's identity from early on (McNeely, 10). As a result, when police conduct an illegal search, it appears more "acceptable" to the viewer because guilt has already been established in the narrative (McNeely, 10). When a judge then excludes incriminating but illegally obtained evidence, the viewer may feel that she is prioritizing the interests of the criminal over those of the victim and the public.
A number of other films characterize the criminal justice system as biased against minorities and women. Movies such as A Time to Kill and ...And Justice for All portray heroic attorneys fighting for the vulnerable against a harsh and imposing court system. Ironically, these films villainize the courts in order to highlight the heroism of the attorney and the victimization of the wrongly accused. Although the courts are portrayed this way primarily for dramatic effect, the impression lingers in the minds of audiences, coloring their perception of the judicial system. The double effect is that viewers come to expect too much from attorneys and too little from the court system itself.
"TV court shows distort public view of judicial process"
"Latino-Americans hold surprisingly favorable court perceptions"
The United States is known internationally as a beacon of liberty and justice. Many people risk their lives to share in these benefits, which are guaranteed to every American by the U.S. Constitution. Despite this, the United States has received a harsh assessment of its judiciary, largely due to the influence of the media.
You’re 58% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.