Messner's Study on Masculinity and Organized Sports
This paper summarizes Michael Messner's sociological study "Boyhood, Organized Sports, and the Construction of Masculinities," examining how male identity is shaped through athletic participation. The paper outlines Messner's core hypotheses, research methodology, and findings drawn from 30 semi-structured interviews with former male athletes conducted between 1983 and 1985. It explores how race and socioeconomic status mediate the construction of masculinity, the role of family and father-son relationships, competition's effect on peer bonds, and the differing experiences of white and minority athletes. The paper also reflects on the study's qualitative design and its use of feminist theory to analyze masculine gender identity formation from boyhood through adulthood.
- Overview and Research Questions: Messner's hypotheses on sports and masculinity
- Methodology and Sample Design: Interview process, sample demographics, and structure
- Literature Review and Thematic Focus: Father-son bonds, competition, and conditional self-worth
- Conclusions and Findings: Race and class shape masculine identity through sport
- Reflections on the Study's Structure: Qualitative design and reader inference requirements
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper follows a clear organizational structure, walking through each component of Messner's study — hypotheses, methodology, literature, and conclusions — in a logical sequence.
- It identifies key variables and methodological choices even when Messner himself did not label them explicitly, demonstrating the student's ability to apply research literacy to an academic text.
- The comparative framing — contrasting the experiences of white middle-class athletes with those of ethnic minority athletes from lower socioeconomic backgrounds — effectively highlights Messner's central argument about race and class as mediating factors.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates source analysis and summarization as an academic skill. Rather than simply restating the article's content, the student interprets Messner's implicit methodological choices — such as inferring independent and dependent variables — and evaluates the study's design. This reflects critical reading of a social science text.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by introducing Messner's research questions, proceeds through methodology and sample characteristics, then examines the literature review themes (father-son relationships, competition, conditional self-worth), and closes with a conclusion that synthesizes Messner's findings. A final reflective section comments on the study's qualitative nature and what the reader must infer independently. The structure mirrors a standard article summary format appropriate for sociology coursework.
Overview and Research Questions
Michael Messner's article "Boyhood, Organized Sports, and the Construction of Masculinities" offers insight into a study he completed regarding male attributes and how masculinity is defined within organized sports. The following is a summary of the article, identifying the hypotheses, dependent and independent variables where discernible, the data source, and the methodology.
Messner makes it very clear from the outset what questions his study seeks to answer. The questions he raises include: "In what ways do males construct masculine identities within the institution of organized sports? In what ways do class and racial differences mediate this relationship and perhaps lead to the construction of different meanings and perhaps different masculinities?" The final question is "what are some of the problems and contradictions within these constructions of masculinities?" (Messner, p. 88).
Methodology and Sample Design
Messner is also very clear about the methodology and construction of his study. Over the course of a two-year period, between 1983 and 1985, he conducted 30 interviews with male former athletes. According to Messner, the former athletes were primarily from the United States and had been involved in major league sports. The average retirement period for those interviewed was approximately five years, and the median age was 33. The racial breakdown consisted of two Hispanics, 14 Black athletes, and 14 white athletes. The majority of those interviewed were considered to be low on the socioeconomic scale prior to their participation in major sports; however, the majority of white retired athletes reportedly came from middle-class backgrounds. Interview participants were randomly selected to represent various levels of success, sports involvement, age, race, and socioeconomic status.
Interviews were tape-recorded and considered semi-structured, lasting anywhere from half an hour to up to six hours. The areas covered generally included the participant's earliest experiences with sports in childhood, their athletic career, their disengagement or retirement from sport, and what their life had been like following their athletic career. Additionally, Messner focused part of the interviews on the successes and failures participants experienced during their careers, in their relationships with women and other men, and how their bodies responded to the physical stress associated with being an athlete.
Messner refers to the interview process as collecting life histories, with the expressed purpose of applying feminist theory regarding masculine gender identity — assessing how the notion of masculinity is developed and changes from boyhood to manhood within the social context and social constructs of organized sports (p. 89). Messner subdivided his sample group according to men from higher-status backgrounds, consisting mainly of white retired athletes, and those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, comprised primarily of ethnic and racial minorities.
Literature Review and Thematic Focus
Messner drew on opinions from leaders in the field of boyhood and sports as part of a literature review, which helped establish the contextual frame of reference for his study's findings. Family influences were addressed within this literature, as was the relationship between boys and their fathers — whether that relationship existed or was absent — and the impact either circumstance had on a boy's decision to enter sports and how that decision manifested in adult life.
An early commitment to organized sports and the concept of male identity was also explored. Another area of focus was the notion of conditional self-worth and the impact of competition. What the literature on this subject suggests is that although boys tend to form close bonds with other boys within the context of organized sports, the pressure associated with performance and winning frequently undermines those relationships. Competition between potential friends creates comparisons regarding skills, acceptance, and performance that work against closeness and friendship.
Moreover, much of this pressure comes from the adults involved in organized sports. Adults' emphasis on winning at all costs significantly undermines boys' goals of partnership and peer cohesion. These dynamics establish differentiation in the status of one athlete over another and lay the foundation for competition that extends into adulthood.
Works Cited
Messner (the source article needs to be cited here).
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.