This paper examines five major theories of employee motivation — Adams' Equity Theory, Herzberg's Two-Factor Hygiene Theory, Maslow's Hierarchy of Human Needs, Skinner's Reinforcement Theory, and Vroom's Expectancy Theory — and evaluates their practical relevance in a vocational context. Using a financial sector lending organization as a case study, the paper analyzes how commission- and bonus-driven environments align most naturally with Vroom and Skinner frameworks. It then considers the implications of applying Adams' Equity Theory and Maslow's Hierarchy as alternative motivational strategies, concluding that Adams' Equity Theory may offer particular utility in financially driven workplaces.
The paper demonstrates applied theory analysis: it moves from broad theoretical exposition to targeted workplace application, then evaluates competing frameworks comparatively. This approach — define, apply, compare — is a standard and effective structure for organizational behavior essays at the undergraduate level.
The paper opens with a survey of five motivation theories, drawing connections between them (e.g., Herzberg's roots in Maslow). The second section applies those theories to a real vocational context, identifying which frameworks management already uses implicitly. The final section evaluates two alternative theories — Maslow and Adams — for their potential utility in that same setting, ending with a reasoned recommendation favoring Adams' Equity Theory.
There are five major theories of employee motivation: Adams' Equity Theory, Herzberg's Two-Factor (Hygiene) Theory, Maslow's Hierarchy of Human Needs, Skinner's Reinforcement Theory, and Vroom's Expectancy Theory (George & Jones, 2008). Adams' Equity Theory suggests that employee satisfaction is largely a function of the degree to which an individual perceives fundamental fairness and equality with respect to the way other employees are treated by their employer. According to Herzberg's Two-Factor Hygiene Theory, employee satisfaction is substantially dependent on two categories of factors: motivating factors and hygiene factors. Motivating factors are positive rewards that drive performance and positive attitude, while hygiene factors — such as a pleasant work environment and other work-related circumstances — are those whose absence corresponds to a decrease in satisfaction and motivation (George & Jones, 2008).
The conceptual foundation of Herzberg's Hygiene Theory lies in Maslow's earlier theory of human psychological development (Daft, 2005). Maslow defined a five-stage hierarchy of human needs, of which the third and fourth stages — social needs and the need for esteem in the eyes of others, respectively — are most relevant to employee motivation. Specifically, employee motivation can be a function of the degree to which individual employees value social bonds and the peer and organizational recognition or respect they receive for their efforts (Daft, 2005).
Skinner's theory of employee motivation is primarily an application of his broader principles of positive reinforcement, according to which organisms — including employees — tend to repeat behaviors that produce positive outcomes and avoid behaviors that result in negative ones (Robbins & Judge, 2009). Similarly, Vroom's Expectancy Theory suggests that employees are best motivated when they clearly understand how their performance connects to positive results for themselves (Robbins & Judge, 2009).
Generally, individuals who choose a career in finance are motivated by the pursuit of financial reward. In that regard, employee motivation in the lending component of financial institutions tends to emphasize commissions and bonuses, which align most closely with the Vroom and Skinner concepts of vocational motivation. Management has also attempted to motivate performance in a manner most consistent with Herzberg's Two-Factor Hygiene Theory: high volume is rewarded with bonuses, praise, and advancement opportunities, while lower performance is not actively punished — only unrewarded. Management appears to believe that this approach allows the most talented and self-motivated employees to thrive.
In practice, this approach has resulted in a situation where some employees are far more driven than others, and some treat their positions as little more than a source of steady work and a regular paycheck. The reliance on extrinsic incentives such as commissions and bonuses reflects an assumption that financial reward is the primary — and perhaps sufficient — driver of performance in this environment.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.