Multi-Channel Retail Consumer Behavior: A Study Review
This paper critically reviews Schroder and Zaharia's (2008) empirical study of multi-channel retail consumer behavior in Germany. The review examines the study's theoretical framework, including Engels' five-stage buying process and four consumer shopping orientations: convenience, independence, recreation, and risk aversion. It evaluates the methodology — comprising focus groups, one-on-one interviews, and a telephone survey of 525 respondents — and analyzes key findings about how consumers distribute information-gathering and purchasing activities across channels such as in-store, catalog, and online. The review also identifies notable methodological limitations, including demographic bias in the survey sample and ambiguous framing of certain research constraints.
- Introduction: Overview of Schroder and Zaharia's 2008 retail study
- Multi-Channel Retailing and the Online Shift: How online retail expanded multi-channel consumer options
- Purpose and Research Questions: Study goals and three core research questions
- Theoretical Framework: The Buying Process: Engels' five-stage model applied to channel use
- Methodology and Sampling: Focus groups, interviews, and telephone survey design
- Shopping Motives and Channel Patterns: Four orientations and dominant channel usage patterns
- Findings and Hypotheses Evaluated: Hypothesis testing and statistical comparisons across channels
- Conclusion: Key takeaways on online versus in-store consumer preferences
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The review moves systematically through the source study — context, purpose, theory, method, and findings — making it easy to follow the logic of the original research.
- Critical observations are woven into the summary rather than reserved for a separate section, giving the review an analytical rather than purely descriptive character.
- The paper uses specific data points (e.g., "80% of respondents were women," "67.4% were single-channel users") to anchor its evaluations, grounding critique in evidence from the source.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates evaluative summarization — the ability to accurately represent a study's claims and then assess their validity within the same discussion. Rather than simply reporting what the authors found, the reviewer flags where reasoning is weak (e.g., the demographic bias the authors did not acknowledge) and where findings align with broader literature on online shopping behavior.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an introduction to the study's context and then develops through logically sequenced sections: the conceptual background of multi-channel retailing, the study's stated purpose and research questions, the theoretical buying-process model, methodology and its limitations, and a detailed walk-through of the survey findings grouped by shopping orientation and channel mode. A brief conclusion synthesizes the key takeaways and recurring tensions in the data.
Introduction
Schroder and Zaharia (2008) examined the buying habits of retail consumers in Germany, with particular attention to how consumers behaved with respect to multi-channel shopping. They had noticed a trend in which retailers were operating multiple channels, and that these channels would at times complement one another. A common example is a company that maintains both an online store and physical brick-and-mortar locations. A consumer might research a product through one channel and then complete the purchase through another. The authors examined the flow of information from company to consumer and how consumers used that information in their purchasing decisions.
Multi-Channel Retailing and the Online Shift
One of the core concepts of the paper is multi-channel retailing. Retailers have utilized multiple channels for decades, but the issue has grown more prominent with the rise of online retailing. Online retailing has lowered the barrier to entry for retail overall, such that most offline retailers now maintain an online shop of some kind. The strength of an established offline brand, for example, helps draw traffic to an online presence. Moreover, online shops carry a number of additional benefits for companies: they allow sales outside of normal shop opening hours, which in Germany are restricted by law, and they allow brands to expand their service area so that customers in smaller communities can access a retailer even if no physical location exists nearby.
For the consumer, the ease of online shopping represents a significantly lower barrier than visiting a physical store. A shopper can quickly and conveniently comparison shop from home. The cost of acquiring the critical information needed to make purchase decisions has decreased substantially with the growth of online retailing. The authors were interested in how these changes have manifested in consumer behavior with respect to multi-channel retailers.
Purpose and Research Questions
Working from this foundation, the authors positioned their study as a contribution to the body of knowledge that retailers can draw on when designing multi-channel systems. The study focused on consumer behavior and how shoppers approach multi-channel purchasing. Because the field is relatively young, a full understanding of consumer behavior at the intersection of online and offline retailing is still emerging, and the relevant body of knowledge is still being built. Larger companies may conduct their own proprietary research, but smaller ones generally cannot, giving this work a direct practical application.
The central focus of the study was the determination of consumer behavior with respect to two key activities: information gathering and purchasing. Specifically, the study sought to identify the factors that lead consumers either to use a single channel for both tasks or to use multiple channels across those tasks. There were three research questions at the heart of the study, as elaborated on page 453:
1. What are the shopping motives of customers who shop through a multi-channel retailer?
2. Over which channels do the customers of a multi-channel retailer spread the "information prior to purchase" and the "purchase" stages?
3. Can the different patterns of behavior be explained by different shopping motives?
Theoretical Framework: The Buying Process
A critical theoretical underpinning of the study is the buying process model, since the study separates two distinct elements of consumer purchasing. The authors outline Engels' five stages of the buying process: need recognition, information search, pre-purchase alternative evaluation, purchase decision, and post-purchase evaluation. This study focuses primarily on stages two through four. These stages are undertaken with differing degrees of intensity along a spectrum ranging from low-involvement to high-involvement purchases. The authors apply this theoretical model to multi-channel retailing, recognizing that the information search and purchase decision can each be carried out through any of the available channels.
Conclusion
In conclusion, there are a number of interesting findings here, tempered by the somewhat unrepresentative demographic profile of the survey respondents. Consumers shop online for independence but carry a degree of risk aversion that prevents broader adoption of online purchasing. Consumers still prefer the brick-and-mortar shopping experience, find it convenient, and tend to view it as less risky. Online shoppers who complete their purchases in-store tend to be those who value a low-cost information acquisition process that can be completed at any time, but who still prefer the physical store for reasons of payment security, faster delivery, and the overall shopping experience.
References
Schroder, H. & Zaharia, S. (2008). Linking multi-channel customer behavior with shopping motives: An empirical investigation of a German retailer. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 15, 452–468.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.