My Sister's Keeper: Ethics of Savior Siblings in Healthcare
This paper examines the ethical dimensions of Jodi Picoult's novel My Sister's Keeper, focusing on the phenomenon of "savior siblings" and the principle of patient autonomy in healthcare. Drawing on nursing ethics frameworks, including the American Nurses Association Code of Ethics, the paper analyzes how genetic technologies such as preimplantation genetic diagnosis and in vitro fertilization raise complex moral questions when used to create children as organ donors for ill siblings. The paper argues that while saving a sick child is a compelling moral imperative, it cannot justify overriding the autonomy and self-determination of the savior sibling. Principles of beneficence and non-maleficence are applied to the novel's central conflict, with implications for how nurses should counsel families navigating these ethically charged decisions.
- Introduction: Genetic Technology and Ethical Dilemmas: Novel's ethical stakes and Anna's savior sibling status
- Savior Siblings and Autonomy: Autonomy principle applied to savior sibling dilemma
- Beneficence, Non-Maleficence, and the Rights of the Savior Sibling: Nursing duties to protect the savior sibling
- Conclusion: Policy, Self-Determination, and the Future of Genetic Technology: Policy advocacy as the ethical path forward
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper uses a well-known novel as a sustained case study, grounding abstract ethical principles in a concrete narrative that readers can engage with emotionally and intellectually.
- It applies multiple nursing ethics principles — autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence — in an integrated way, showing how they interact and sometimes conflict in real clinical scenarios.
- The argument avoids a simplistic pro/con structure, acknowledging the moral weight on both sides before staking a clear position on savior sibling autonomy.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the use of literary analysis as an ethical case study — a technique common in applied ethics and healthcare humanities. Rather than treating the novel as mere illustration, the writer engages critically with Picoult's narrative choices (such as the car crash ending) and evaluates them against ethical frameworks, showing how to move between textual evidence and theoretical argument.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a contextualizing introduction that establishes the central ethical issue and introduces key characters. The body section develops the autonomy argument in depth, with supporting references to nursing ethics codes and academic literature on savior siblings. A brief evaluative subsection addresses beneficence and non-maleficence. The conclusion pivots toward policy implications, arguing that better regulatory frameworks — rather than prohibition — are the appropriate response to advancing genetic technology.
Introduction: Genetic Technology and Ethical Dilemmas
"I was born because a scientist managed to hook up my mother's eggs and my father's sperm to create a specific combination of precious genetic material…because I could save my sister, Kate" (Picoult, 2004, p. 7–8). Anna, the protagonist of Jodi Picoult's novel My Sister's Keeper, bemoans her special status when she first introduces herself to readers, and this tension persists throughout her narrative. Picoult's novel raises several interrelated ethical issues in healthcare, including those related to the autonomy and self-determination of minors and the rights of those who, due to medical circumstances, lack the power to make their own healthcare choices.
One of the overarching issues in the book — and the one most central to Anna's story — is that of medical genetic technology. Medical technologies have allowed for processes like in vitro fertilization, which has become relatively common practice, in spite of what Anna claims at the opening of her story: "unlike the rest of the free world, I didn't get here by accident" (p. 8). Anna's attitude towards her purpose in life, her background and origin story, and her relationship with her sister Kate do change with age and maturity. Her own ethical stance shifts somewhat, yet Anna internalizes the anger she feels towards her parents to the point where she seeks medical emancipation.
When Anna seeks emancipation, readers immediately sympathize, mainly because of the way her parents seem to be deliberately using her rather than viewing Anna as part of the decision-making process. Anna is what is known as a "savior sibling" (Raz, Schues, Wilhelm, et al., 2017, p. 191). The savior sibling phenomenon is a peculiar one from a medical ethics standpoint. In a different family, Anna might have been provided with a more substantial degree of self-determination, but in My Sister's Keeper she remains bereft of the opportunity to exercise her rights as a human being.
Savior Siblings and Autonomy
Advanced genetic technology has particularly transformed reproductive science and reproductive practices around the world. Many people do not seem to have a problem with in vitro fertilization for couples who cannot conceive, in many cases advocating passionately on their behalf despite the pressing need to adopt unwanted children who have already been born. Yet introduce the possibility that a couple might deliberately engineer a child to have the genetic features conducive to organ donation for a sibling, and serious ethical objections arise. From a nursing perspective, it is critical to focus on the principle of autonomy in medical ethics.
Autonomy is a core precept of nursing ethics. The American Nurses Association stresses the central importance of autonomy in its code of ethics (Olson & Stokes, 2016). The savior sibling phenomenon addressed in My Sister's Keeper is inextricably linked with that of patient autonomy. Interestingly, attitudes towards savior siblings may be culturally embedded, requiring closer scrutiny of contextual variables when nurses counsel patients considering whether to have a savior baby to save the life of a sick child (Raz, Schues, Wilhelm, et al., 2017). A nurse faces an ethical dilemma when addressing the issue of savior siblings. To not support the right of the parent or the sick child to have access to an organ donor essentially sentences the sick child to death. On the other hand, facilitating the birth of a savior sibling runs the risk of impeding that child's autonomy.
Picoult's novel focuses mainly on the latter issue while sensitively addressing the needs of the parents and their desire to keep Kate alive. From Anna's perspective, her parents love Kate first and foremost, and only had Anna to be a savior — not to love her for her own inherent worth. Given the way the story ends, Picoult clearly comes out against the phenomenon of savior siblings, and does so in a way that skirts around the complexity of the issue. Anna dies in a car crash — something that can be considered an act of God, something as out of her control as the circumstances of her birth. As such, the entire concept of autonomy is called into question. No individual on earth could have asked to be born, and many people were in fact planned children rather than the accidents that Anna claims them to be.
The savior sibling is not inherently an unethical practice. The life of the savior sibling becomes intimately, and in many ways beautifully, entwined with that of the family and community. Few individuals have the opportunity to be born with such a strong sense of purpose: to save the life of another person.
Conclusion: Policy, Self-Determination, and the Future of Genetic Technology
As medical technologies become more advanced, nurses need improved ways of responding to situations like these. Medical technologies can be tremendously beneficial. Instead of fearing genetic science, nurses can advocate for policy that strengthens the rights of savior siblings — allowing children like Anna more self-determination throughout their childhood and alerting parents to the limitations on their control over their child's life and body.
It is likely that Anna would have willingly submitted to the surgery had she been given the power to make that decision on her own. The power of self-determination remains crucial in healthcare, especially as the body is only one component of the whole human being.
References
Olson, L. L., & Stokes, F. (2016). The ANA Code of Ethics for Nurses with interpretive statements: Resource for nursing regulation. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 7(2), 9–20.
Picoult, J. (2004). My Sister's Keeper. New York: Washington Square Press.
Raz, A., Schues, C., Wilhelm, N., & Rehmann-Sutter, C. (2017). Saving or subordinating life? Popular views in Israel and Germany of donor siblings created through PGD. Journal of Medical Humanities, 38(2), 191–207.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.