Netiquette in Business Communication: History and Rules
This essay examines netiquette — a portmanteau of "network etiquette" and "Internet etiquette" — as a business communication trend. It traces netiquette's origins in the bandwidth-constrained early days of Usenet bulletin boards, through the formal 1995 RFC 1855 guidelines published by the Internet Engineering Task Force, and into contemporary standards for email, social media, and online forums. The paper highlights core principles such as remembering the human behind every message, avoiding all-caps as the digital equivalent of shouting, and maintaining professionalism in email correspondence. A brief reflection section discusses what the research revealed about the role of technology in shaping online conduct.
- Introduction: Scope and approach of netiquette research
- Origins of Netiquette: Early Usenet rules and bandwidth-era conduct
- RFC 1855 and Formal Guidelines: Internet Engineering Task Force formal netiquette document
- Modern Netiquette Principles: Contemporary online behavior standards and tips
- Business Email Etiquette: Professional email conduct and signature guidelines
- Reflection: Research insights and evolving perception of online conduct
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its discussion in historical context, tracing netiquette from pre-Web Usenet conventions to modern social media norms, giving the argument a clear developmental arc.
- It uses a primary source — the actual RFC 1855 document — by quoting directly from it, which adds authority and concreteness to abstract behavioral concepts.
- The reflection section demonstrates self-awareness about the research process, noting where expectations were confirmed and where new understanding emerged, modeling metacognitive academic writing.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of synthesis across multiple sources. Rather than summarizing each source in turn, the writer weaves together historical documents, subject-matter experts, and current practitioners to build a coherent, evolving narrative about netiquette. This technique is especially visible in the transition from the early Usenet rules to RFC 1855 to contemporary guidelines, where each source advances the argument rather than simply restating it.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens with an introduction explaining the scope and approach of the research, then moves into a definition section, followed by a historical overview of Usenet-era rules. The RFC 1855 section provides a primary-source anchor before the discussion shifts to modern principles. A focused subsection addresses business email etiquette specifically. The essay closes with a reflective conclusion that evaluates what was learned, making it a hybrid essay-reflection format common in undergraduate communication courses.
Introduction
Even though netiquette has existed for decades, there are few definitive works that cover every aspect of the subject — behavioral, technological, ethical, and practical. Much has been written on the topic, from technology-constrained rules of conduct for online users to ethical considerations to common-sense approaches for preserving one's privacy. These treatments are helpful, as far as they go, but they provide a disjointed and uneven treatment of the subject.
This essay surveys the available literature on netiquette, drawing on several dozen articles and excerpts from two books. Netiquette proved to be a more complex subject than initially anticipated. The discussion below places netiquette in a historical context and summarizes some of its less widely considered aspects.
Origins of Netiquette
Netiquette — a portmanteau of network etiquette or Internet etiquette — describes the code of conduct governing acceptable online behavior. The term is typically used to refer to forms of online communication that include forums, email, blogs, message boards, and chat. Whereas some netiquette topics focus on technical issues, they are all ultimately concerned with how people relate to one another. As with any form of communication, it is necessary to understand what constitutes acceptable behavior. In a worst-case scenario, violating a community's code of conduct — for example by using spam — can result in being banned from that community. It is possible for someone to be banned from Internet service providers, search engines, forums, and web hosts, among others (Netiquette, 2011).
Netiquette originally grew out of a set of rules that date back to the days before the World Wide Web existed. Many netiquette conventions originated from the historical and technological limitations of the precursor to the Usenet system. Early bulletin board users were constrained by bandwidth, storage, cost, and speed limitations. Some of the early rules spelling out prohibited behavior included the following:
Posting off-topic — Users did not want to pay for or spend time downloading content in which they had no interest. Therefore, users who veered away from the subject line of the original thread were strongly encouraged to change the subject line to "Off Topic: [Subject]."
Cross-posting — Equivalent to modern-day spamming, users were discouraged from posting the same message to multiple groups.
Quoting — The practice of forwarding an entire message each time someone added a brief comment, such as "Me too" or "That's funny," was prohibited due to bandwidth constraints (Technogeek, 2011).
RFC 1855 and Formal Guidelines
As the Internet evolved, so too did netiquette. Although it seems unusual by today's standards, there was actually a formal document — RFC 1855 — published to define netiquette standards. A Request for Comments (RFC) is normally used by the Internet Engineering Task Force, a group of engineers and computer scientists, to define network protocols and standards. Nevertheless, RFC 1855, Netiquette Guidelines, was officially issued in 1995 to "provide a minimum set of guidelines for Network Etiquette (Netiquette)" (Hambridge, 1995). The memo's status field specifically notes that it is not a specification document for any type of Internet standard — an almost humorous disclaimer. The following excerpts illustrate the tone of the guidelines:
"Never put in a mail message anything you would not put on a postcard."
"Remember that people with whom you communicate are located across the globe. If you send a message to which you want an immediate response, the person receiving it might be at home asleep when it arrives. Give them a chance to wake up, come to work, and log in before assuming the mail didn't arrive or that they don't care."
"Limit line length to fewer than 65 characters and end a line with a carriage return."
"The cost of delivering an e-mail message is, on the average, paid about equally by the sender and the recipient. This is unlike other media such as physical mail, telephone, TV, or radio. Sending someone mail may also cost them in other specific ways like network bandwidth, disk space, or CPU usage. This is a fundamental economic reason why unsolicited e-mail advertising is unwelcome (and is forbidden in many contexts)" (Hambridge, 1995).
The remainder of the RFC continues in the same vein and includes a selected bibliography of 28 sources.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.