Why New Orleans Should Not Be Rebuilt After Hurricane Katrina
This paper argues that the City of New Orleans should be abandoned and relocated to higher ground inland rather than rebuilt in its current flood-prone location. Drawing on historical accounts of recurring hurricane damage dating back to the city's founding in 1718, geographical analyses of its below-sea-level terrain, and economic assessments of post-Katrina recovery costs exceeding $200 billion, the paper makes the case that continued investment in New Orleans is neither sustainable nor justifiable. It also examines the city's pre-existing social problems—poverty, racial segregation, failing schools, and population decline—and reviews proposed engineering solutions, concluding that all are prohibitively expensive stopgaps against inevitable natural forces.
- Introduction: A City at Risk: Thesis: New Orleans should be relocated inland
- A History of Recurring Disaster: Centuries of hurricanes and floods damaging New Orleans
- Geography and the Origins of Vulnerability: Below-sea-level terrain and rainfall overwhelm flood systems
- Social and Economic Conditions Before and After Katrina: Poverty, failing schools, and population loss compounded by Katrina
- Proposed Engineering Solutions and Their Limitations: Costly engineering fixes reviewed and found insufficient
- Conclusion: The Case for Relocation: Relocation argued as the only sustainable solution
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its argument in a long historical timeline, showing that Hurricane Katrina was not an anomaly but the latest episode in a pattern stretching back to the city's founding — this historical depth strengthens the inevitability argument.
- It balances multiple dimensions of the problem — geographic, economic, social, and political — rather than relying on a single line of evidence, giving the thesis a well-rounded foundation.
- Proposed counterarguments and engineering alternatives are presented and then systematically refuted on cost-benefit grounds, demonstrating awareness of opposing viewpoints without conceding the central claim.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses synthesis of secondary sources effectively: multiple scholars (Colten, Johnson, Dunlap et al., McCarragher) are woven together to build a cumulative case rather than being treated as isolated citations. Quoting a description of the 1849 Sauve Crevasse that reads like a Katrina account is a particularly effective rhetorical move that dramatizes the historical pattern.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a broad historical framing before narrowing to New Orleans specifically. A single extended review-and-discussion section covers historical disasters, geographic factors, social conditions, and economic costs in sequence, followed by a numbered list of proposed engineering solutions and their rebuttals. A concise conclusion restates the thesis with a comparative reference to the Three Gorges Dam relocations. The Works Cited list follows Chicago-style author-date formatting.
Introduction: A City at Risk
Throughout history, humans have learned the hard way that living in some parts of the world is risky because of any number of factors — such as living near an active volcano like Pompeii, or in earthquake- and flood-prone regions like the Yangtze River valley, where millions of lives have been lost over the centuries. In some cases, the geographic attributes of such regions are so compelling that people have ignored these dangers and rebuilt their cities time and again, only to have them ravaged by the destructive forces of nature. In other cases, the decision was made to abandon the affected area in favor of more hospitable living areas where the chances of yet another disaster were far less.
Today, the City of New Orleans faces this same type of decision as local, regional, and federal officials seek ways to avoid a recurrence of Hurricane Katrina and its heart-wrenching aftermath. Yet Katrina is only one of the latest in a long series of weather-related events that have destroyed New Orleans over and over again. This paper reviews the relevant literature to show that the decision should be made to abandon the existing city environs in favor of a more suitable location further inland at the earliest opportunity. A summary of the research and important findings in support of this thesis is presented in the conclusion.
A History of Recurring Disaster
Founded in 1718 by Jean Baptiste le Moyne and named for a regent of France (New Orleans history 2011), New Orleans has a long history of battling the elements for its survival. This history has been fraught with the same types of disastrous events, with only the extent of the devastation and the dates differing from the most recent catastrophes. In this regard, Colten (2005) provides a useful description of the devastation caused by one such weather-related event on the citizens of New Orleans: "The high water destroyed several bridges, interrupted business throughout the city, contributed to health problems, disrupted the lives of thousands, and caused extensive property damage throughout the city" (Colten 2005, 28).
Although that quotation appears to describe the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in eerie ways, it is actually a description of the Sauve Crevasse disaster that occurred in 1849 (Johnson 2006). In fact, following the onslaught of a hurricane just a year after the city's establishment, the construction of a massive system of earthen levees began in 1723, and — judging them inadequate — engineers further reinforced them in 1724 to protect a city already noted for the frequency of hurricanes (Clark 1970, 4). Described by Johnson as "one of many environmental events in the history of New Orleans that have either blown away or waterlogged part of the city," the Sauve Crevasse was the handwriting on the wall for all to see, but the warning signs were ignored to the peril of the city's citizens. As Colten puts it, "On 3 May 1849, a weakened portion of the levee on the Sauve Plantation 17 miles above New Orleans was breached, creating a 30-foot-wide gap. Water poured southward into the city, approaching the French Quarter by 17 May. The devastation was massive" (2005, 26–27).
If this had been an isolated event, the Sauve Crevasse disaster could be dismissed as an anomaly, but the historical record shows that it was just the beginning of a long list of similar events that would destroy or cause massive destruction to New Orleans over the years. Hurricanes have ravaged the New Orleans area time and again (Ludlum 1963, 55). McCarragher (2011) reports that "Louisiana was hit by 49 of the 273 hurricanes that made landfall on the American Atlantic Coast between 1851 and 2004. On average, one major storm crosses within 100 nautical miles of New Orleans every decade" (1).
Johnson (2006b) emphasizes that the Sauve Crevasse "incident is one of many that have periodically left water in streets and homes. For people living in New Orleans these events serve as historical benchmarks: 'Where were you during Hurricane Betsy? The flood of April 1983? The flood of May 1995?'" (139). Likewise, McCarragher suggests that "New Orleans history offers its own perspective, including the four most destructive storms of the twentieth century: the Hurricane of 1947, Betsy, Camille, and Georges" (3). These hurricanes exacted an enormous toll on New Orleans and its people, but they did not receive the same high-profile media coverage as Hurricane Katrina and have therefore been largely forgotten by the rest of Americans despite their severe impact (McCarragher 3). As McCarragher concludes, "The people affected never forgot Camille, but the nation as a whole allowed the memory of the destruction, the importance of efficient preparation, and the cohesive recovery methods fade into the background" (4).
Works Cited
Behar, Michael. "5 Bold Ideas for a Hurricane-proof New Orleans: Why Just Rebuild the Crescent City When We Can Reinvent It? Here, the Complete Plan for Riding out a Category-5 Storm." Popular Science 268, no. 2 (February 2006): 56–58.
Clark, John G. New Orleans, 1718–1812: An Economic History. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1970.
Clayton, Richard L., and Richard L. Spletzer. "Worker Mobility before and after Hurricane Katrina." Monthly Labor Review 129, no. 8 (2006): 11–13.
Colten, Craig E. An Unnatural Metropolis: Wresting New Orleans from Nature. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2005.
Colten, Craig E., and John Welch. "Hurricane Betsy and Its Effects on the Architectural Integrity of the Bywater Neighborhood." 2003.
Dolfman, Michael L., Solidelle F. Wasser, and Bruce Bergman. "The Effects of Hurricane Katrina on the New Orleans Economy." Monthly Labor Review 130, no. 6 (2007): 3–4.
Dunlap, Eloise, Bruce D. Johnson, and Edward Morse. "Illicit Drug Markets among New Orleans Evacuees before and Soon after Hurricane Katrina." Journal of Drug Issues 37, no. 4 (2007): 981–983.
Frazier-Anderson, Pamela N. "Public Schooling in Post-Hurricane Katrina New Orleans: Are Charter Schools the Solution or Part of the Problem?" The Journal of African American History 93, no. 3 (2008): 410–411.
Johnson, Merrill L. "An Unnatural Metropolis: Wresting New Orleans from Nature." The Geographical Review 96, no. 2 (2006a): 325–327.
Johnson, Merrill L. "Geographical Reflections on the 'New' New Orleans in the Post-Hurricane Katrina Era." The Geographical Review 96, no. 1 (2006b): 139–140.
Ludlum, David M. Early American Hurricanes, 1492–1870. Boston: American Meteorological Society, 1963.
McCarragher, Barbara. "New Orleans Hurricane History." 2011.
"New Orleans History." Gateway New Orleans, 2011.
Waldman, Amy. "Reading, Writing, Resurrection." The Atlantic Monthly 299, no. 1 (January/February 2007): 88–.
Already a member? Log in
Unlock the rest of this paper
135,000+ research papers · AI writing tools · Plagiarism & AI detection
7-Day Pass
Does not renew
Get 7-Day PassMonthly
Renews at $12.99/month until canceled
Start MonthlyAnnual
Renews at $99/year until canceled
Start Annual- Unlimited AI writing tools
- Plagiarism and AI text detection tool
Plan details
Unlimited AI writing tools are for individual, non-automated use and are subject to our Terms of Service and abuse-prevention measures.
TextChecker scans: 3 during the 7-Day Pass, or 5 per month with Monthly and Annual.
Prices exclude applicable tax.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.