Organisational Behaviour: Endothon and Techfite Acquisition
This paper examines the organisational behaviour challenges arising from the acquisition of Techfite by Endothon, two companies with distinctly different corporate cultures. It analyses how Endothon's task-oriented culture and Techfite's employee-oriented culture can be aligned using McKinsey's 7S model, and considers the structural implications of the acquisition. The paper argues that a decentralised organisational structure offers the best fit for post-acquisition operations, allowing Techfite to retain autonomy while leveraging Endothon's resources. It also addresses the inevitability of employee resistance to cultural change and proposes involvement strategies — including surveys, staff meetings, and discussion forums — as effective tools for minimising that resistance.
- Corporate Culture Differences Between Endothon and Techfite: Contrasting task-oriented and employee-oriented corporate cultures
- Using McKinsey's 7S Model to Align Organisational Cultures: Applying the 7S framework to bridge cultural misalignment
- Choosing the Right Post-Acquisition Organisational Structure: Decentralised structure recommended for post-acquisition operations
- Managing Employee Resistance to Cultural Change: Sources and nature of employee resistance during acquisition
- Strategies for Involving Employees in the Change Process: Employee involvement techniques to reduce change resistance
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Applies a well-known academic framework (McKinsey's 7S model) directly to a concrete scenario, demonstrating analytical rather than merely descriptive thinking.
- Balances theory and practical recommendation — for each challenge identified (culture clash, structural choice, resistance), the paper proposes a specific solution grounded in the source material.
- Maintains logical sequencing: it moves from diagnosis (culture differences) to framework application, to structural decision, to anticipated problems, and finally to mitigation strategies.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied framework analysis — taking a multi-element theoretical model (McKinsey's 7S) and mapping it onto a specific organisational scenario to generate actionable recommendations. This technique shows examiners that the student can translate abstract theory into practical business judgement rather than simply defining terms.
Structure breakdown
The paper is structured as a linear argument across five thematic sections: (1) contrasting the two companies' cultures, (2) introducing the 7S framework as the alignment tool, (3) recommending a decentralised post-acquisition structure, (4) anticipating resistance and explaining its causes, and (5) proposing employee involvement as the primary mitigation strategy. The single reference (Hayes, 2014) is cited consistently throughout, anchoring every major claim in the same theoretical source.
Corporate Culture Differences Between Endothon and Techfite
Endothon and Techfite have markedly different corporate cultures. Endothon, a space exploration agency, has a task-oriented culture — sometimes referred to as a customer-oriented culture — that focuses on results and productivity and is driven by safety and innovation. This orientation demonstrates that the organisation prioritises task completion and customer needs above other concerns. While a task-oriented culture is valuable for enhancing productivity and customer satisfaction, it can reduce employee morale, motivation, and commitment when the needs and welfare of staff receive little or no attention.
Techfite, by contrast, has an employee-oriented culture — one that values employees' contributions and seeks to maximise their welfare by fulfilling their needs. Techfite achieves this through flexibility and empowerment. Although an employee-centred culture is effective at motivating staff, it can result in diminished focus on productivity. These contrasting cultural orientations represent a significant challenge for the proposed acquisition.
Using McKinsey's 7S Model to Align Organisational Cultures
An acquisition is a useful corporate-level strategy for enhancing a firm's competitive advantage in the marketplace. For the intended outcomes to be achieved, however, there must be cultural fit between the organisations involved. As noted above, Endothon and Techfite have different corporate cultures, meaning their values and working practices are not aligned. This misalignment can be detrimental to the success of the acquisition.
McKinsey's 7S model provides a suitable framework for aligning Techfite's culture with Endothon's. As the name suggests, the model offers seven elements for diagnosing and monitoring change: strategy (the purpose of the organisation); skills (core competencies); structure (organisational design); systems (procedures); staff (human resources); style (managerial behaviour); and shared values (Hayes, 2014). For an organisation to excel, these elements must be properly aligned with one another. In this case, Techfite's structure and style ought to be brought into alignment with Endothon's.
The alignment process encompasses the following steps: mapping the current situation based on the seven elements; identifying gaps and inconsistencies between the elements; determining the changes needed to close those gaps; setting goals and objectives to be achieved through alignment; and implementing the required changes.
Choosing the Right Post-Acquisition Organisational Structure
An appropriate organisational structure is equally essential to a successful acquisition. When an acquisition occurs, two broad outcomes are possible. The two organisations may integrate into a single entity with a uniform, centralised structure, or the acquired company may be allowed to operate autonomously within a decentralised structure. The second option — a decentralised organisational structure — is more suitable in this case.
Under this arrangement, Endothon would communicate its corporate values but retain Techfite's executives and allow them the same autonomy and authority they exercised previously. Keeping Techfite structurally separate and preserving its independence offers meaningful advantages: the organisation would be better positioned to focus on its core strengths while still drawing on its parent company's resources and capabilities (Hayes, 2014). In essence, the acquisition functions as a form of strategic partnership rather than a full merger.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.