Proposing a New Organizational Communication Structure
This paper proposes a new communication structure for an organization by examining five essential concepts: active listening, conflict resolution, leadership strategies, formal and informal communication, and organizational culture. Drawing on scholarly sources and personal workplace experience, the paper argues that each concept serves as a foundational or supporting element of effective organizational communication. Organizational culture is identified as the most critical foundation, while active listening, leadership presence, conflict resolution training, and the complementary use of formal and informal channels are presented as the infrastructure that sustains it. Together, these concepts provide a practical framework for strengthening communication flows and preventing the silos and breakdowns that can impede organizational performance.
- Introduction: Five concepts for a new communication structure
- Active Listening: Building rapport and trust through attentive communication
- Conflict Resolution: Using emotional intelligence to address workplace conflict
- Leadership Strategies: Leader presence, clarity, and humor promote communication
- Formal and Informal Communication: Complementary channels for documentation and instant feedback
- Organizational Culture: Culture as the foundational environment for communication
- Conclusion: Recap of five concepts and their collective importance
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper integrates personal workplace experience alongside scholarly citations, grounding abstract concepts in recognizable, concrete scenarios that strengthen credibility and readability.
- Each section follows a consistent pattern — defining the concept, explaining its relevance, citing supporting research, and connecting it back to the overarching communication structure — giving the essay a cohesive, cumulative argument.
- The paper establishes a clear conceptual hierarchy early on (organizational culture as foundation; all other concepts as supporting infrastructure), which helps readers understand how the five elements relate rather than treating them as an unordered list.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses direct quotation from scholarly sources (Hocker & Wilmot, 2014; Schein, 1985) to anchor analytical points, then extends those quotations with original commentary. This technique — quote, contextualize, apply — is a hallmark of undergraduate academic writing and prevents over-reliance on paraphrase while still demonstrating engagement with sources.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a framing introduction that identifies the five concepts and explains the hierarchy among them. Each of the five body sections addresses one concept independently, moving from the interpersonal (active listening) to the interpersonal-relational (conflict resolution), then to leadership, then to communication channels, and finally to the broadest, most foundational concept (culture). The conclusion recaps each concept in the same order, reinforcing the framework before closing with a memorable metaphor. This deliberate sequencing from micro to macro gives the argument a satisfying logical arc.
Introduction
Communication structure is important in any organization because communication is what keeps the various parts informed, aligned, and supportive of one another. Communication can flow downward from the top of the organization to lower levels, upward from lower levels to the top, horizontally among colleagues and co-workers, and diagonally among departments. In short, communication structures matter because if communication breaks down, performance and efficiency can be affected, silos can develop, and the organization can be prevented from achieving its aims (Neill & Jiang, 2017). Successful communication within an organization, however, depends upon the application of essential concepts — such as how organizational culture can support communication flows, and how active listening can build rapport among colleagues. This paper explores and discusses five essential concepts for developing a new communication structure: active listening, organizational culture, conflict resolution, leadership strategies, and formal and informal communication.
These concepts can serve as stepping stones to strengthening a new communication structure, functioning as the foundation and infrastructure of solid communication. Foundationally speaking, organizational culture will be the most important concept; supporting the structure, however, will be leadership, conflict resolution, formal and informal communication, and active listening.
Active Listening
Active listening is a critically important part of communication because it enables one to hear all of a message — even that which is conveyed non-verbally. It is a skill that anyone can cultivate, and it is especially important among leaders who wish to demonstrate servant leadership and emotional intelligence (Jonsdottir & Fridriksdottir, 2020). Active listening helps others to see that their message has been received, as active listeners give feedback — repeating back what was said or giving an indication of reception. Most importantly, active listeners establish rapport and build trust by demonstrating attentiveness and concern for what is being communicated, and by showing appreciation for the communicator and the information passed along. Active listeners never take anything for granted, never appear dismissive or discourteous, never seem preoccupied when receiving a communication, always reply promptly and with thoughtful feedback, and always foster a spirit of camaraderie by engaging in a two-way flow of communication that is socially and emotionally sensitive (Jonsdottir & Fridriksdottir, 2020).
The keys to adopting an active listening strategy include giving the speaker undivided attention and showing that the message is being received. This can be accomplished by repeating back the main idea of what was said, using the speaker's own words to demonstrate that you heard them, or giving verbal and non-verbal cues of reception (Jonsdottir & Fridriksdottir, 2020). Paying attention and demonstrating that attention are ways of giving the speaker the respect and confidence needed to come forward with a message. If one does not feel appreciated or confident that a message will be received well, there is the risk that the communication will never be made at all. When communications are not made, gaps appear, processes break down, performance suffers, and the organization fails to meet its goals. In practice, active listening can change the communication culture of an organization almost overnight: people feel more upbeat, more responsive and responsible, more appreciated, more accommodating, and more satisfied in the workplace.
Two additional keys to active listening are deferring judgment and responding appropriately. If one receives information that might initially provoke a strong reaction, it is best to defer judgment until more information has been obtained — because additional data may alter how one views the situation. One should never be quick to judge based on an initial communication. Equally important is responding appropriately: if a message is sent via email, the appropriate response is a prompt email acknowledging receipt, followed by a substantive follow-up if the message warrants it.
References
Clifton, J. (2006). A conversation analytical approach to business communication: The case of leadership. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 43(3), 202–219.
Greatbatch, D., & Clark, T. (2003). Displaying group cohesiveness: Humour and laughter in the public lectures of management gurus. Human Relations, 56(12), 1515–1544.
Hocker, J. W., & Wilmot, W. W. (2014). Interpersonal conflict (9th ed.). VitalSource Bookshelf.
Jonsdottir, I. J., & Fridriksdottir, K. (2020). Active listening: Is it the forgotten dimension in managerial communication? International Journal of Listening, 34(3), 178–188.
Neill, M. S., & Jiang, H. (2017). Functional silos, integration & encroachment in internal communication. Public Relations Review, 43(4), 850–862.
Sanchez-Nunez, M., Patti, J., & Holzer, A. (2015). Effectiveness of a leadership development program that incorporates social and emotional intelligence for aspiring school leaders. Journal of Educational Issues, 1(1), 5–9.
Schein, E. H. (1985). Defining organizational culture. Classics of Organization Theory, 3, 490–502.
Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. (2013). How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 138–158.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.