Parent Opposition to Common Core and Educational Reform
This paper examines the paradox of widespread parental opposition to Common Core educational standards even when many Americans broadly support educational reform. Drawing on opt-out statistics from New York State, national survey data from the Friedman Foundation, and a widely shared viral social media incident involving Common Core math, the paper argues that parental resistance often reflects unfamiliarity with new teaching methods rather than evidence that those methods are ineffective. It concludes that action research soliciting parental feedback is better suited to evaluating a school's communication strategy than to assessing the validity of curriculum reforms themselves.
- Introduction: The Paradox of Parental Opposition: Scale of parental opt-out opposition in New York
- Parental Attitudes Toward Common Core Standards: Survey data reveals split between general and specific reform support
- The Viral Math Check: A Case Study in Misunderstanding: Father's viral post illustrates parental unfamiliarity with methods
- Implications for Action Research and Curriculum Reform: Parent feedback measures communication, not curriculum validity
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Uses a concrete, relatable anecdote — the viral Facebook math-check post — to ground an abstract policy argument in a memorable real-world example.
- Balances quantitative evidence (opt-out percentages, survey data) with qualitative observation to build a nuanced picture of parental attitudes.
- Acknowledges the legitimacy of parental concern while still arguing that parent opinion alone is not a reliable measure of curriculum validity — a mature, measured stance.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the use of counterexample to complicate a surface-level argument. Rather than simply documenting parental opposition, it introduces the viral math-check case to show that parental discomfort with unfamiliar methods does not constitute evidence that those methods are pedagogically unsound. This move — validating emotional reaction while challenging its logical conclusions — is a hallmark of evidence-based argumentation in education policy writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with statistical evidence of opt-out behavior in New York to establish the scale of opposition, then introduces national survey data to show the paradox between general support for reform and specific opposition to Common Core. A viral social media incident serves as a case study illustrating the gap between parental perception and pedagogical intent. The conclusion reframes the implications for action research, distinguishing between assessing communication effectiveness and assessing curriculum quality.
Introduction: The Paradox of Parental Opposition
While it might seem intuitively obvious that parents wish to provide the best possible education for their children, in many instances there has been extremely vociferous opposition among parents to standards-based reform in education. In New York State, for example, the ability to opt out of standards-based testing has been exercised by an overwhelming percentage of the population. In 2014, "the parents of 60,000 New York students refused to have their children take the [standardized] test ... The superintendent of the Comsewogue Schools has test refusal letters for 80% of his students," and these numbers are increasing rather than decreasing (Burris, 2015). Assuming parents want the best for their children, this indicates a sharp divide between parents' perceptions of what is necessary to improve their children's educational prospects and those of administrators who are attempting to redesign the curriculum and use data from standardized tests to do so.
Parental Attitudes Toward Common Core Standards
Parents often view the additional homework, unfamiliar instructions, and the difficulty in understanding the rationale behind new teaching methods as barriers to accepting a revised curriculum. Interestingly, although a majority of Americans broadly support educational reform in the form of the Common Core, opposition among parents who must actually help their children learn through Common Core methods is strong. The Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice's annual Schooling in America survey found that while "a slight majority of American adults said they favored Common Core, when given a definition of the standards ... nearly half — 49% — of parents polled said they oppose the standards" (Bidwell, 2014).
Parents' priorities are thus not necessarily aligned with what administrators and objective educational analysts have determined to be the best approaches to educating children. Parents also appeared to be more favorably disposed toward individualized curricula; they were "more likely to highly rate private and parochial schools rather than public schools" and to "think students are spending too much time on standardized testing." This suggests that if reforms are able to bolster the strengths of individual students, parents may be more interested in supporting rather than blocking those reforms (Bidwell, 2014).
References
Bidwell, A. (2014). Intense Common Core opposition is higher among parents. U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved from http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/06/26/intense-common-core-opposition-is-higher-among-parents
Burris, C. (2015). As testing begins, parental opposition to Common Core ramps up. Hechinger Report. Retrieved from http://hechingerreport.org/as-testing-begins-parental-opposition-to-common-core-ramps-up/
Mehta, J. (2015). The dad who wrote a check using Common Core math doesn't know what he's talking about. Patheos. Retrieved from http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2015/09/21/the-dad-who-wrote-a-check-using-common-core-math-doesnt-know-what-hes-talking-about/
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.