Improving Patient Safety With Transformational Leadership
This paper examines a critical patient safety incident in a hospital setting in which an elderly cancer patient admitted for unexplained dizziness was left unattended, fell, and sustained injuries. Using the Institute of Medicine's five essential management practices as a framework, the paper analyzes where the organization fell short — from communication failures and inadequate staffing to a blame-focused subculture — and identifies evidence-based best practices for improvement. The paper then explores how the nursing supervisor's transformational leadership style, grounded in Gardner's leadership tasks and QSEN competencies, helped convert the incident into an organizational learning opportunity and a model for lasting patient safety improvement.
- Introduction: A Patient Safety Crisis: Overview of the patient fall incident and setting
- Key Patient Safety Failures and the Five Management Practices: IOM framework applied to organizational shortcomings
- Evidence-Based Best Practices for Patient Safety Improvement: QSEN and literature-based strategies for improvement
- Using Knowledge Management to Build a Learning Organization: Converting the incident into institutional learning
- Transformational Leadership and Patient Safety: Gardner's tasks and Kotter's model in nursing leadership
- Conclusion: Synthesis of failures, best practices, and leadership response
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its analysis in a specific, vivid real-world incident, giving abstract management frameworks immediate practical relevance.
- It systematically applies the Institute of Medicine's five management practices as an evaluative scaffold, demonstrating structured critical thinking rather than general commentary.
- The integration of multiple authoritative frameworks — IOM, QSEN, Gardner's leadership tasks, and Kotter — shows depth of theoretical engagement appropriate to the nursing leadership context.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper exemplifies applied case analysis: a specific clinical incident is used as the primary evidence base, and multiple theoretical frameworks are layered on top to diagnose failures and prescribe improvements. This technique — moving from concrete case to abstract framework and back — is particularly effective in professional and health sciences writing, where practice must be tied to theory.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a workplace overview and introduces the incident. It then applies the IOM's five management practices to assess organizational failures. A second major section evaluates best practices using QSEN and other literature, including implementation steps. A third section focuses on transformational leadership through Gardner's tasks and Kotter's framework. The conclusion synthesizes all three threads, reinforcing the nursing supervisor's role as a transformational leader turning crisis into learning.
Introduction: A Patient Safety Crisis
A pressing area of need in my workplace is enforcing and communicating hospital policies and procedures regarding the care of patients who require special attention. This need is illustrated by a recent incident in which an elderly cancer patient admitted for unexplained dizziness was left unattended, subsequently fell, and sustained injuries. Fortunately, the facility has a nursing supervisor who exemplifies transformational nursing leadership. She immediately implemented best practices, exhibited Gardner's leadership tasks, and is working to transform the unfortunate incident into a valuable learning opportunity for the entire organization.
Key Patient Safety Failures and the Five Management Practices
While a number of areas would benefit from improvement, a recent incident underscores the urgent need for better communication and enforcement of hospital policies and procedures. An 87-year-old female diagnosed with Stage 4 colon cancer was admitted to the hospital due to dehydration and otherwise unexplained dizziness and fainting. She was left unattended while toileting, fainted, fell face-first, and incurred multiple facial bruises and possible brain trauma. The nurse who left her unattended was a visiting nurse who claimed she had instructed the patient to press the call button if she needed help. The patient was found face-down on the bathroom floor 25 minutes later by a hospital aide.
Leaving an elderly patient admitted for dehydration and unexplained dizziness unattended clearly violated hospital policies and procedures. The following morning, the patient was again left unattended in the bathroom until one of her family members angrily intervened. The aide replied that no hospital staff had told him the patient could not be left unattended. The patient's family filed a formal complaint, removed their mother from the facility against medical advice, and had her transported to another hospital approximately 40 miles away. This sequence reveals a serious disconnection between hospital policy and the actual behaviors of at least one visiting nurse and one aide. Viewed through the lens of the Institute of Medicine's five management practices (Institute of Medicine, 2004), the following failures are apparent:
a. Balancing the Tension Between Production Efficiency and Reliability (Safety)
The hospital's current financial situation requires it to operate as cost-effectively as possible, which has resulted in fewer nurses covering an entire patient floor. As a result, the visiting nurse cut corners by leaving the patient unattended rather than ensuring her safety. Additionally, either the nursing supervisor failed to adequately inform or the next day's aide failed to follow the hospital's procedures for safeguarding this patient while she was toileting. The organization failed to adequately balance production efficiency and reliability.
b. Creating and Sustaining Trust Throughout the Organization
The organization's level of internal trust suffered significantly from this incident (Institute of Medicine, 2004). The sequence of blame — first the visiting nurse blaming the patient, then the aide blaming the nursing supervisor for not informing him of the patient's special needs — created a deeply distrustful atmosphere. That distrust spread beyond the staff to the patient's family, who lost confidence in the facility's ability to provide adequate care and ultimately chose to seek care elsewhere.
c. Actively Managing the Process of Change
The organization failed in at least one of the five practices important for successful change implementation: ongoing communication, training, use of mechanisms for measurement and feedback, sustained attention, and worker involvement (Institute of Medicine, 2004). Specifically, the organization failed at ongoing communication — either the nursing supervisor did not sufficiently communicate the relevant policies and procedures, or the visiting nurse and aide failed to fully internalize them. However, progress is being made in the aftermath. The nursing supervisor encouraged the family's formal complaint, met with them, obtained a written report and photographs of the patient's injuries, and is now developing special instructions that emphasize the importance of careful attendance to this type of patient.
d. Involving Workers in Decision Making About Work Design and Work Flow
The organization failed to adequately involve nursing staff in decisions about work design and workflow (Institute of Medicine, 2004). While the nurse involved was a visiting nurse, regularly employed nurses have consistently expressed the need for larger staffing levels to provide adequate care for all patients on the floor. The visiting nurse did not leave the patient to take a break; she had other nursing duties to attend to and was compensating for inadequate staffing. This systemic issue must be addressed.
e. Using Knowledge Management Practices to Establish the Organization as a Learning Organization
In the aftermath of this incident, the organization is beginning to create, acquire, and transfer knowledge, and to modify behavior to reflect new understanding (Institute of Medicine, 2004). The nursing supervisor invited a formal complaint and a meeting with the patient's family, gathered written and photographic documentation of the incident, and is developing teaching materials to reinforce both patient care policies and the importance of communicating each patient's specific needs.
Evidence-Based Best Practices for Patient Safety Improvement
a. What Are the Best Practices?
Several best practices are relevant to this situation. The nursing supervisor actively sought the knowledge and strategies necessary to empower the patient's family in all aspects of the healthcare process (QSEN Institute, 2014) by engaging them as active partners in promoting health, safety, and well-being. She also focused on future effective communication, consensus building, and conflict resolution while examining nursing roles in patient care (QSEN Institute, 2014). Regarding teamwork, the nursing supervisor is actively analyzing differences in communication style among healthcare team members, identifying barriers to effective teamwork, and discussing strategies for resolving communication breakdowns in patient care situations (QSEN Institute, 2014).
Ultimately, the best practices center on careful adherence to hospital policies and procedures for patients with special conditions. Equally important is the consistent communication of both the policies themselves and each patient's individual needs — for visiting nurses, regularly employed nurses, and aides alike. Finally, the organization must cultivate an environment in which staff prioritize problem-solving over blame. The blame culture that emerged following this incident wasted time and energy that could have been directed toward solving the problem, and it undermined every form of necessary trust. Fortunately, the nursing supervisor and regular nursing staff are actively working to address the shortcomings that led to this incident and to build a communicative, trusting environment in which such events do not recur.
b. How Are They Being Implemented?
The nursing supervisor is in the initial stages of implementing best practices. She acknowledged the importance of the family's thoughts, feelings, and input (Yoder-Wise, 2015, p. 7), and invited both formal and informal feedback through a formal complaint, written and verbal accounts, and photographic evidence. She also met with hospital administrators to explain the situation and highlight every shortcoming — from inattention to communication failures to a blame-driven subculture that undermines the primary goal of excellent patient care. She is now collaborating with regular nursing staff and administration to refine communication processes and build a trusting organizational culture in which staff who need help will ask for it rather than leaving vulnerable patients unattended.
c. What Could the Work Setting Improve Upon?
Based on best practices in the literature, in addition to incorporating patient and family involvement and improving communication, consensus building, and conflict resolution, the organization needs to identify system-level barriers and facilitators of effective team functioning — including the factors that have fostered a distrustful subculture — in order to improve teamwork. This may involve redesigning the systems that support the healthcare team (QSEN Institute, 2014).
Conclusion
Perhaps the most pressing workplace need for improvement is in the area of enforcing and communicating hospital policies and procedures regarding the care of patients requiring special attention. Recently, an elderly cancer patient with unexplained dizziness was left unattended, fell, and was harmed. In this regard, the organization at least partially failed in: balancing the tension between production efficiency and reliability; creating and sustaining trust throughout the organization; actively managing the process of change; involving workers in decision making about work design and workflow; and using knowledge management practices to establish the organization as a learning organization.
Fortunately, the facility has a nursing supervisor who appears to be a natural transformational leader. She actively sought the knowledge and strategies to empower the patient's family in all aspects of the healthcare process, focused on future effective communication, consensus building, and conflict resolution, and examined nursing roles in patient care. She is actively analyzing differences in communication style among healthcare team members, identifying barriers to effective teamwork, and developing strategies to resolve the communication breakdown at the center of this patient care conflict. While drawing on all five essential management practices, the nursing supervisor is especially focused on using knowledge management to establish the organization as a learning organization. She is exhibiting all of Gardner's leadership tasks as though by instinct — envisioning, affirming, motivating, managing, striving for unity, explaining, symbolizing, representing, and promoting vital self-care — offering a compelling model for the kind of leadership that makes lasting patient safety improvement possible.
References
Institute of Medicine. (2004). Executive summary. In Keeping patients safe: Transforming the work environment of nurses. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/read/10851/chapter/2
Institute of Medicine. (2004). Transformational leadership and evidence-based management. In Keeping patients safe: Transforming the work environment of nurses. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/read/10851/chapter/6#109
Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
QSEN Institute. (2014). Competencies in Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN). Retrieved from http://qsen.org/competencies/pre-licensure-ksas/
Yoder-Wise, P. S. (2015). Leading and managing nursing (6th ed.). St. Louis: Elsevier-Mosby.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.