Critique of a Qualitative Study on Perfectionism and Life Narratives
This paper critiques the 2017 qualitative study by Farmer, MacKinnon, and Cowie titled "Perfectionism and Life Narratives: A Qualitative Study." The critique examines the study's methodology, findings, ethical considerations, strengths, and limitations. The study recruited twenty university students — six adaptive and fourteen maladaptive perfectionists — and used thematic analysis of autobiographical interview narratives to identify recurring themes across both groups. Key findings included differences in how adaptive and maladaptive perfectionists narrate relationship success, as well as shared definitions of perfectionism. The paper evaluates the appropriateness of the qualitative interview approach, the adequacy of ethical safeguards, and the study's limitations, notably its small and homogeneous sample. Suggestions for future research, including the addition of a non-perfectionist control group, are also discussed.
- Introduction: Study identified and research questions introduced
- Summary of Methods: Interview design, sampling, and ethical procedures
- Summary of Findings: Themes and group comparisons from interviews
- Ethical Aspects: Ethics board approval and participant protections
- Evaluation of the Study: Strengths, limitations, and methodological appraisal
- Conclusion: Synthesis of critique and future research suggestions
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The critique follows a clear, logical structure that mirrors the sections of the original study — methodology, findings, ethics, and evaluation — making it easy to follow and compare.
- It accurately distinguishes between adaptive and maladaptive perfectionism, demonstrating content understanding that grounds the critique in the study's conceptual framework.
- The inclusion of a concrete suggestion for future research (a non-perfectionist control group) strengthens the conclusion by moving beyond summary toward constructive scholarly engagement.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates critical appraisal of a primary research source, a foundational skill in psychology and social science writing. Rather than simply summarizing the study, it evaluates methodological choices — such as the appropriateness of qualitative interviews and thematic analysis — and identifies limitations like sample homogeneity and the difficulty of establishing causation in qualitative designs. This technique shows the ability to read research analytically rather than passively.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief introduction identifying the article under review and the research questions it addresses. A methods summary follows, covering participant recruitment, interview procedures, and data analysis. The findings section highlights key themes and group comparisons. Ethical considerations and an overall evaluation each occupy their own sections, before a conclusion that synthesizes the critique and recommends future directions. References are formatted in APA style throughout.
Introduction
The purpose of this paper is to critique a study by examining several key aspects: its methodology, results, ethical issues, strengths, weaknesses, and limitations. The article under evaluation is the study by Farmer, J. R., MacKinnon, S. P., & Cowie, M. (2017), titled "Perfectionism and Life Narratives: A Qualitative Study."
The research questions put forward in the study are: (a) how do maladaptive perfectionists view perfectionism? and (b) what themes recur in the autobiographical narratives of persons with high levels of perfectionism? The study's literature review cited a limited number of sources and highlighted a paucity of qualitative research on perfectionism, even though quantitative research on the topic exists (MacKinnon, Sherry, & Pratt, 2013). The literature review considered five to six studies related to motivation, cognition, and other perfectionism-related themes. There was no apparent personal bias in the selection of those studies. The studies were relevant to the research questions and provided the necessary information on the target subject.
Summary of Methods
The interview method was the preferred data-collection approach in this study. Through interviews, both open- and closed-ended questions could be posed to participants. The interview method is well suited to extracting personal experiences and forms a large portion of this study's data. The qualitative approach was appropriate for the type of inquiry and was conducted using thematic analysis. Qualitative researchers typically conduct a limited number of interviews due to the time required for in-depth analysis; each interview is studied closely to isolate recurring themes across the majority of sessions. The themes identified are then treated as the basis for interpreting all the interviews (Newman, 2016).
Twenty students from a university were recruited via flyers and online advertisements to participate in the study. Six were adaptive perfectionists and fourteen were maladaptive perfectionists. Each participant underwent a qualitative interview, and relevant data were collected from those sessions. The interviews were audio-recorded, and participants were given a paper containing the questions asked during their recounting of important life events as a reference. Interview protocols were verbally explained to the participants, who were allowed to ask questions before beginning either section of the interview.
The authors employed reflexivity and bracketing while analyzing the collected data to prevent personal bias from influencing the results. All data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Informed consent was obtained from each participant to fulfill all ethical and legal requirements for research involving human participants. Informed consent refers to the voluntary willingness of an individual to participate in a clinical trial or other research — intended to advance medical knowledge or social welfare — after receiving full information about all aspects of the study. Participants can make their decision only after being provided with a complete account of what will be required of them (Nijhawan et al., 2013).
All participants consented to the use of anonymous quotations. Each participant was provided with a debriefing form and received compensation for their role in the study. Compensation was selected from three options: (a) a monetary payment of $40 (CAD); (b) two bonus qualifying points for psychology courses through the online undergraduate pool in the Department of Neuroscience and Psychology; or (c) a monetary payment of $20 (CAD) and one bonus qualifying point for psychology courses through the same department's undergraduate pool.
Summary of Findings
Five themes were identified from the Perfectionism and Life Narratives interviews for each group. Each theme was illustrated by quoting participants verbatim. A comparison was drawn between the recurring themes of maladaptive perfectionists and those of adaptive perfectionists. The authors' discussion of the findings correlated the results of previous studies with those of the present study. The study reported that adaptive perfectionists describe relationship success as a central life theme, while few maladaptive perfectionists did the same. Adaptive perfectionists reported happiness in relationships, along with experiences of love and support. However, both types of perfectionists offered similar definitions of perfectionism and recounted similar ideas about its best and worst aspects. A majority of participants identified setting high personal standards and goals as the best aspect of being a perfectionist, while the desire for ever-greater excellence in every performance was identified as the worst.
Conclusion
The study conducted by the researchers was well planned and executed using thematic analysis. By making inferences from participants' life narratives, the underlying perspectives of perfectionists can be drawn out. The authors used interviews with open- and closed-ended questions to identify recurring themes for each individual. A comparison between adaptive and maladaptive perfectionists was also attempted based on the information collected. The study revealed an underlying focus on interpersonal relationships and academic achievement in both groups. Themes of perfectionism were identifiable from each participant's life narrative, and the results may prove useful to clinicians examining autobiographical narratives for signs of perfectionism. The study also identified an agentic contamination theme, in which negative emotions arose from successive events that tarnished an agentic achievement. The feelings of negativity and regret toward the self identified during the study had been reported in prior research on perfectionism.
Future studies should include a non-perfectionist "control" group to improve the quality of findings. Such a group would allow for a comparison between how perfectionists and non-perfectionists interpret life events, and would help eliminate confounding factors — such as age or academic status — that might otherwise affect the differentiation of features specifically related to perfectionism.
References
Farmer, J. R., MacKinnon, S. P., & Cowie, M. (2017). Perfectionism and life narratives: A qualitative study. SAGE Open, 7(3), 1–14.
MacKinnon, S. P., Sherry, S. B., & Pratt, M. W. (2013). The relationship between perfectionism, agency, and communion: A longitudinal mixed-methods analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.02.007
Newman, M. (2016). Research methods in psychology (2nd ed.). Bridgepoint Education.
Nijhawan, L., Janodia, M., Muddukrishna, B., Bhat, K., Bairy, K., Udupa, N., & Musmade, P. (2013). Informed consent: Issues and challenges. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research, 4(3), 134–140.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.